Issue · Veterans

Veterans

Every veterans bill, vote, and legislator stance in New Jersey, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
4
119th Congress
Top supporter
Jefferson Van Drew
76% support rate
Top opponent
Analilia Mejia
20% support rate
Ranked legislators
8
3 support · 5 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving veterans in New Jersey

Legislators moving veterans in New Jersey
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Votes
Jefferson Van Drew
Jefferson Van Drew House · District 2
R
Support
76% 221
Christopher H. Smith
Christopher H. Smith House · District 4
R
Support
65% 221
Thomas H. Kean, Jr.
Thomas H. Kean, Jr. House · District 7
R
Support
60% 178
Analilia Mejia
Analilia Mejia House · District 11
D
Strong −
20% 71
Frank Pallone, Jr.
Frank Pallone, Jr. House · District 6
D
Oppose
29% 219
Robert Menendez
Robert Menendez House · District 8
D
Oppose
29% 222
LaMonica McIver
LaMonica McIver House · District 10
D
Oppose
29% 222
Nellie Pou
Nellie Pou House · District 9
D
Oppose
29% 221
Showing 4 of 4 bills

All veterans bills

in committee · United States · House Sep 8, 2026

HR 5634: Veterans Flight Training Responsibility Act of 2026

This bill limits the amount of Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits available for flight training at public colleges and universities. It sets a $100,000 maximum total benefit for such training (adjusted annually for inflation), affecting veterans pursuing flight programs at public institutions. The inflation adjustment uses the Consumer Price Index, increasing the cap each year based on prior cost-of-living changes. The limit applies only to veterans starting flight training on or after August 1, 2026. This is a direct change to benefit eligibility under the VA's education program.
in committee · United States · House Jan 27, 2026

HJRES 144: Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Veterans Affairs relating to "Reproductive Health Services".

HJRES 144 is a congressional disapproval resolution targeting a specific rule issued by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) on December 31, 2025, which addressed "Reproductive Health Services" (90 Fed. Reg. 61310). This resolution directs Congress to disapprove the VA rule under Chapter 8 of Title 5, U.S. Code, meaning the rule would have no legal effect if passed. The bill directly affects the VA's implementation of reproductive health services for veterans, as it seeks to nullify the agency's existing policy. This is a procedural measure, not a substantive policy change, aimed solely at blocking the VA's rule through congressional action.
in committee · United States · Senate Mar 4, 2025

SRES 105: A resolution condemning the mass terminations of employees of the Department of Veterans Affairs carried out with no justification or analysis of the impact on veterans and their families.

SRES 105 is a Senate resolution condemning the February 2025 mass terminations of 2,400 Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) employees by Secretary Doug Collins, without justification or analysis of impacts on veterans. The resolution states the Senate opposes these terminations - specifically noting the lack of transparency about effects on critical services like mental health care, claims processing, and cybersecurity - and calls for all affected employees to be reinstated. This resolution does not change VA policy but expresses the Senate’s formal disapproval of the terminations and demands accountability. It was introduced by 30 Senators on March 4, 2025.
in committee · United States · Senate Mar 25, 2026

SJRES 103: A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Veterans Affairs relating to "Reproductive Health Services".

SJRES 103 is a congressional disapproval resolution targeting a Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) rule on reproductive health services for veterans. The resolution, if passed, would block the VA rule from taking effect by invoking the Congressional Review Act (Chapter 8 of Title 5, U.S. Code), meaning the rule published in the Federal Register (December 31, 2025) would have no legal force. This directly affects the VA’s ability to implement new guidelines for reproductive health services at its facilities, preserving existing policies instead. The resolution does not create new policy but halts a specific administrative rule.
Sub-Topics Women's Health