Issue · Immigration

Immigration (Enforcement)

Every immigration bill, vote, and legislator stance in New Hampshire, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
2
2026 Regular Session
Top supporter
Aboul Khan
67% support rate
Top opponent
Alexis Simpson
33% support rate
Ranked legislators
10
5 support · 5 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving enforcement in New Hampshire

Legislators moving enforcement in New Hampshire
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Decisive votes
Aboul Khan
Aboul Khan House · District Rockingham 30
R
Support
67% 3
Alvin See
Alvin See House · District Merrimack 26
R
Support
67% 3
Andrew Prout
Andrew Prout House · District Hillsborough 13
R
Support
67% 3
Arnie Davis
Arnie Davis House · District Coos 2
R
Support
67% 3
Barbara Comtois
Barbara Comtois House · District Belknap 7
R
Support
67% 3
Alexis Simpson
Alexis Simpson House · District Rockingham 33
D
Oppose
33% 3
Alice Wade
Alice Wade House · District Strafford 15
D
Oppose
33% 3
Alissandra Murray
Alissandra Murray House · District Hillsborough 20
D
Oppose
33% 3
Allan Howland
Allan Howland House · District Strafford 20
D
Oppose
33% 3
Allison Knab
Allison Knab House · District Rockingham 12
D
Oppose
33% 3
Showing 2 of 2 bills

All immigration bills

failed · New Hampshire · Senate Jan 7, 2026

SB 71: relative to cooperation with federal immigration authorities.

SB 71, the "Anti-Sanctuary City Act," prohibits New Hampshire local governments (counties, municipalities, and other local entities) from blocking state or federal law enforcement from complying with federal immigration laws (Title 8 of the U.S. Code). The bill allows the state Attorney General to sue local entities that violate this law, seeking court-ordered remedies including injunctions and fines up to 25% of the local entity’s state funds from the previous fiscal year. Violations would require the Attorney General to specify the violating policy in court findings. The law takes effect January 1, 2026, and does not impose direct costs on the state but may require Attorney General resources for enforcement.
failed · New Hampshire · House Mar 13, 2026

HB 1609: limiting the use of state, county, and municipal funds and property for construction and operation of certain immigrant detention facilities.

HB 1609 prohibits New Hampshire state, county, and municipal governments from using public funds or property to build, operate, or pay for immigrant detention facilities, particularly those managed by private companies. It bans spending on construction, renovation, repurposing public property for detention, selling public property for such use, and making payments to private detention operators. The bill does not affect existing 287(g) agreements between local law enforcement and federal immigration authorities or the provision of health and safety services to detained individuals. Counties may face potential revenue losses if they stop cooperating with federal immigration programs, but municipalities are not expected to have financial impacts.