Issue · Healthcare

Healthcare

Every healthcare bill, vote, and legislator stance in New Hampshire, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
4
2026 Regular Session
Top supporter
Dan Innis
82% support rate
Top opponent
Cindy Rosenwald
27% support rate
Ranked legislators
10
5 support · 5 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving healthcare in New Hampshire

Legislators moving healthcare in New Hampshire
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Decisive votes
Dan Innis
Dan Innis Senate · District 7
R
Strong +
82% 11
David Rochefort
David Rochefort Senate · District 1
R
Strong +
82% 11
Howard Pearl
Howard Pearl Senate · District 17
R
Strong +
82% 11
James Gray
James Gray Senate · District 6
R
Strong +
82% 11
Tim Lang
Tim Lang Senate · District 2
R
Strong +
82% 11
Cindy Rosenwald
Cindy Rosenwald Senate · District 13
D
Oppose
27% 11
David Watters
David Watters Senate · District 4
D
Oppose
27% 11
Debra Altschiller
Debra Altschiller Senate · District 24
D
Oppose
27% 11
Donovan Fenton
Donovan Fenton Senate · District 10
D
Oppose
27% 11
Pat Long
Pat Long Senate · District 20
D
Oppose
27% 11
Showing 4 of 4 bills

All healthcare bills

vetoed · New Hampshire · Senate Aug 20, 2026

SB 468: relative to enabling alternative treatment centers to operate a greenhouse cultivation location.

SB 468 allows alternative treatment centers (ATCs) that provide medical cannabis to apply for permission to operate greenhouse cultivation facilities, which typically use less energy than indoor growing. ATCs must submit a detailed plan showing how greenhouse cultivation will lower energy costs and reduce prices for registered qualifying patients. The state department must create rules for greenhouse operations - including security, location, and compliance with local zoning - and seek input from patients, caregivers, and community residents before approving new sites. ATCs will also report annually on greenhouse impacts to energy costs and product prices as part of their required state filings.
vetoed · New Hampshire · House Aug 19, 2026

HB 232: relative to the rights of conscience for medical professionals.

HB 232 protects New Hampshire healthcare providers' right to refuse participation in abortions, sterilizations, or artificial contraception based on religious, moral, or ethical beliefs. It requires health care institutions to prominently post notices about these rights and prohibits discrimination against providers who conscientiously object. Violations by institutions carry civil fines ($1,000-$10,000 per occurrence), while providers denied employment or other benefits due to objections may seek triple damages plus attorney fees. The law applies to all medical professionals in New Hampshire, including physicians, nurses, pharmacists, and students, and takes effect January 1, 2026.
signed · New Hampshire · House Jun 2, 2026

HB 1356: relative to the statute of limitations for bringing a private right of action for violation of the statute prohibiting medical procedures and treatments intended to alter a minor's gender, authorizing the application of sunscreen in schools and camps without a licensed health care provider's note or prescription, and establishing a skin cancer prevention education program.

HB 1356 extends the statute of limitations for minors to sue providers for violating laws prohibiting gender-altering medical procedures. It changes the deadline from 2 years to 10 years after a minor turns 18 to file a private lawsuit. This directly affects minors who received such medical treatments before age 18 and wish to pursue legal action. The bill modifies RSA 332-N:3, II, which governs when claims for violations of the gender-procedure ban must be filed. The fiscal note indicates no state or local cost impact.
failed · New Hampshire · House Feb 19, 2026

HB 1811: repealing statutory immunization requirements for children.

HB 1811 repeals all state-mandated vaccination requirements for children in New Hampshire, removing legal obligations for schools and childcare agencies to require immunizations or maintain related records. The bill eliminates provisions for religious and medical exemptions, attendance rules during outbreaks, and reporting requirements to health authorities. It replaces mandatory vaccination with advisory recommendations from health officials, stating schools and agencies cannot deny enrollment based on vaccination status. This directly affects parents, schools, childcare providers, and public health officials by ending the state’s enforcement of childhood immunization rules. The bill takes effect 60 days after passage.