Issue · Education

Education

Every education bill, vote, and legislator stance in New Hampshire, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
14
2026 Regular Session
Top supporter
Peter Varney
91% support rate
Top opponent
Karen Hegner
19% support rate
Ranked legislators
10
5 support · 5 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving education in New Hampshire

Legislators moving education in New Hampshire
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Decisive votes
Peter Varney
Peter Varney House · District Belknap 7
R
Strong +
91% 11
Bryan Morse
Bryan Morse House · District Merrimack 3
R
Strong +
90% 10
Kevin Avard
Kevin Avard Senate · District 12
R
Strong +
88% 17
Steven Smith
Steven Smith House · District Sullivan 3
R
Strong +
84% 25
Jonathan Smith
Jonathan Smith House · District Carroll 5
R
Strong +
81% 36
Karen Hegner
Karen Hegner House · District Hillsborough 41
D
Strong −
19% 27
Stephanie Payeur
Stephanie Payeur House · District Merrimack 8
D
Strong −
19% 32
Dale Swanson
Dale Swanson House · District Hillsborough 5
D
Strong −
19% 37
Catherine Sofikitis
Catherine Sofikitis House · District Hillsborough 7
D
Strong −
19% 21
Matthew Hicks
Matthew Hicks House · District Merrimack 24
D
Strong −
19% 36
Showing 11–14 of 14 bills

All education bills

failed · New Hampshire · House Feb 19, 2026

HB 1427: limiting the authority of a municipality, county, or school district to issue bonds.

HB 1427 restricts municipalities, counties, and school districts in New Hampshire from issuing bonds except for declared emergencies, repairs to critical infrastructure (like water systems or public safety facilities), securing matching federal funds, or voter approval through a majority vote. The bill prohibits most bond issuance after January 1, 2027, with a temporary 4-year transition period (until 2031) allowing limited bonds under strict budget caps. Violations would make bonds voidable by taxpayers, with courts able to award legal fees to successful plaintiffs. This directly affects local governments’ ability to finance projects without meeting these specific criteria.
failed · New Hampshire · House Feb 19, 2026

HB 1799: relative to required state funding for providing an opportunity for an adequate education.

HB 1799 defines what constitutes a "constitutionally adequate education" in New Hampshire, requiring the state to fund specific resources to ensure all students have access to quality education regardless of location. The bill mandates funding for key staff (teachers, counselors, librarians, nurses), instructional materials, technology, facilities maintenance, and transportation starting in 2026. It directs school districts and the state to develop plans addressing educational outcome disparities between districts. This directly affects public school districts and the state's education budget, shifting responsibility to cover these defined costs rather than relying solely on local property taxes.
failed · New Hampshire · House Feb 12, 2026

HB 1716: relative to the academic accountability of education freedom accounts.

HB 1716 requires students in New Hampshire's Education Freedom Account (EFA) program to demonstrate academic progress through one of three methods: taking standardized tests (national or state), or maintaining a portfolio evaluated by a certified teacher using a Department of Education-developed rubric. The bill directs the Department of Education's Division of Learner Support to create and publish this rubric annually, then compile data from all student reports to analyze academic proficiency rates. This data must include metrics like graduation rates, grade level, gender, race, and aid categories. The bill does not provide new funding but estimates annual costs of $300,000-$350,000 for staff and system upgrades to implement the reporting and analysis requirements.
failed · New Hampshire · House Jan 8, 2026

HB 675: limiting total central office administrative expenses by school districts and requiring reporting of central office administrative expenses to the department of education.

HB 675 increases the statewide education property tax revenue cap to $773 million for 2025 and requires municipalities to remit excess tax collections to the state education trust fund. It limits school district spending growth on non-facilities expenses by tying annual appropriations to the 3-year average Consumer Price Index (CPI), with stricter rules after 2027. The bill also raises the base per-pupil adequacy cost from $4,100 to $7,356 and mandates annual reporting of district spending to the Department of Education. These changes directly affect school districts and municipalities managing education funding, effective July 1, 2025. (Note: The bill’s title mentioning "central office expenses" does not align with the actual provisions; this summary reflects the actual tax and spending mechanisms described in the bill text.)
Showing 11 to 14 of 14 bills