Issue · Immigration

Immigration

Every immigration bill, vote, and legislator stance in Montana, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
4
2025 Regular Session
Top supporter
Debo Powers
95% support rate
Top opponent
Morgan Thiel
5% support rate
Ranked legislators
10
5 support · 5 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving immigration in Montana

Legislators moving immigration in Montana
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Votes
Debo Powers
Debo Powers House · District 3
D
Strong +
95% 252
Kelly Kortum
Kelly Kortum House · District 64
D
Strong +
95% 274
Jane Weber
Jane Weber House · District 19
D
Strong +
95% 253
Becky Edwards
Becky Edwards House · District 61
D
Strong +
95% 263
S.J. Howell
S.J. Howell House · District 100
D
Strong +
93% 281
Morgan Thiel
Morgan Thiel House · District 30
R
Strong −
5% 258
Anthony Nicastro
Anthony Nicastro House · District 50
R
Strong −
5% 252
Neil Duram
Neil Duram House · District 1
R
Strong −
5% 248
Vince Ricci
Vince Ricci Senate · District 27
R
Strong −
7% 241
Amy Regier
Amy Regier House · District 6
R
Strong −
7% 280
Showing 4 of 4 bills

All immigration bills

died · Montana · House May 20, 2025

HB 755: Prohibit ownership of private property within state by certain foreign individuals and entities

HB 755 sought to prohibit certain non-resident aliens and foreign entities from owning real property within the state. The bill defined "alien" as any person not a U.S. citizen or national and not a resident of the state, and "foreign entity" as one organized or principally based in a foreign country. If an affected individual or entity owned property, they would be required to divest within six months, after which the property could be sold at public auction. The Attorney General or county attorney would have been able to enforce these provisions, which were set to apply to property purchased on or after January 1, 2026.
died · Montana · House May 20, 2025

HB 618: Provide for a Montana individual freedom act

House Bill 618, the "Montana Individual Freedom Act," aimed to restrict how state and local government agencies, including the Department of Military Affairs, could use public funds. The bill would have prohibited these agencies from spending money on memberships, goods, or services from organizations that discriminate based on race, color, ethnicity, national origin, sex, disability, or religion. It also sought to prevent the expenditure of funds on programs related to "diversity, equity, and inclusion" or on political or social activism. The Attorney General would have been granted authority to investigate alleged violations and adopt rules for enforcement.
died · Montana · House May 20, 2025

HB 927: Generally revise laws related to illegal aliens

House Bill 927 would have required a wide range of professionals and officials in Montana to report individuals they know are "not lawfully present in the United States" to the state Department of Justice. These mandatory reporters would have included healthcare providers, school staff, social workers, law enforcement, and certain clergy members. The bill outlined procedures for the Department of Justice to receive and record these reports, with the option to share information with federal immigration agencies while keeping the reporter's identity confidential. Failure to make a required report would have been a misdemeanor.
died · Montana · House May 20, 2025

HB 439: Creating sheriffs' first initiative for cooperation and communication

HB 439, "Creating sheriffs' first initiative for cooperation and communication," aimed to regulate arrests, searches, and seizures conducted by federal employees and agents in Montana. The bill would have required federal personnel, unless designated as state peace officers, to obtain written permission from the county sheriff before making an arrest, search, or seizure. It provided exceptions for situations like operations on federal land or when an immediate arrest for a witnessed crime was necessary. For some exceptions, permission from the state attorney general would have been required. The bill also allowed county sheriffs discretion on whether to implement these provisions and declared federal laws granting federal employees sheriff-like authority invalid in the state.