Issue · Housing

Housing

Every housing bill, vote, and legislator stance in Montana, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
4
2025 Regular Session
Top supporter
George Nikolakakos
89% support rate
Top opponent
Matt Regier
39% support rate
Ranked legislators
10
5 support · 5 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving housing in Montana

Legislators moving housing in Montana
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Decisive votes
George Nikolakakos
George Nikolakakos House · District 22
R
Strong +
89% 80
Melissa Nikolakakos
Melissa Nikolakakos House · District 20
R
Strong +
85% 78
Josh Kassmier
Josh Kassmier Senate · District 13
R
Strong +
84% 70
Denley Loge
Denley Loge Senate · District 45
R
Strong +
84% 67
Gayle Lammers
Gayle Lammers Senate · District 21
R
Strong +
84% 79
Matt Regier
Matt Regier Senate · District 5
R
Oppose
39% 71
Terry Falk
Terry Falk House · District 10
R
Oppose
40% 81
Jerry Schillinger
Jerry Schillinger House · District 34
R
Mixed −
41% 81
Jedediah Hinkle
Jedediah Hinkle House · District 67
R
Mixed −
42% 74
Kathy Love
Kathy Love House · District 85
R
Mixed −
43% 72
Showing 4 of 4 bills

All housing bills

died · Montana · Senate May 23, 2025

SB 266: Revise municipal zoning to allow for triplex and fourplex housing

SB 266 requires Montana cities with populations over 5,000 to allow triplexes (three-unit homes) and fourplexes (four-unit homes) in areas where single-family homes are permitted, without imposing stricter rules than those for single-family properties. The bill mandates that zoning regulations for these multi-unit housing types cannot be more restrictive than those for single-family residences, including limits on parking (max one space per unit) and reduced requirements for lot sizes or building setbacks. It also encourages local governments to adopt additional housing strategies, such as eliminating or reducing off-street parking mandates and permitting accessory dwelling units. This bill directly affects cities meeting the population threshold, aiming to increase housing density options for residents.
signed · Montana · House May 19, 2025

HB 492: Revise municipal zoning laws related to parking requirements

HB 492 revises municipal zoning laws by setting new limits on the minimum parking space requirements local governments can impose on new developments. The bill generally caps required parking for residential units at one space per unit and for commercial spaces at one space per 5,000 square feet, with specific exemptions for certain types of projects like affordable housing or smaller commercial spaces. If a city or town chooses to require more parking than these new limits, it must compensate the developer or property owner for the real cost of constructing the additional spaces. This legislation directly affects municipal zoning authorities and developers within those areas.
signed · Montana · Senate May 16, 2025

SB 243: Amend zoning regulations to allow taller buildings

SB 243 amends state zoning laws to allow for increased housing density and building height in certain municipalities. In urban areas with populations over 5,000, it requires cities to permit multiple-unit dwellings and mixed-use developments in commercial zones, provided they have municipal water and sewer. For these developments, the bill limits parking requirements to no more than one space per unit and prohibits height restrictions below 60 feet in specific commercial and industrial zones. Furthermore, it mandates that cities with at least 5,000 residents allow duplex housing in areas zoned for single-family residences, with similar zoning regulations.
signed · Montana · Senate May 8, 2025

SB 149: Revise emotional support animal laws

SB 149 revises laws regarding emotional support animals (ESAs) in housing, affecting tenants with disabilities and landlords. The bill allows landlords to request specific documentation from a licensed health care practitioner if a tenant's need for an ESA is not readily apparent. This documentation must come from a practitioner with an established client-provider relationship who has conducted a clinical evaluation and identified the specific therapeutic support the animal provides. The bill also clarifies that ESA registration cards alone are not sufficient proof and holds tenants liable for damages caused by their emotional support animals.