Sen. Mike Moon

Maddy summaryThis bill's abstract states it modifies constitutional provisions related to the General Assembly's powers, but the provided context does not specify the exact changes or affected parties. No concrete policy mechanisms, provisions, or affected groups are described in the available information. Without details on the specific constitutional modifications proposed, a substantive summary cannot be generated. The bill appears to be a constitutional amendment proposal at an early stage (prefiled, first reading).

Maddy summarySJR 107 would repeal Article I, Section 36 of the state constitution, which established the "Right to Reproductive Freedom Initiative." This constitutional provision currently protects certain reproductive healthcare rights. The bill directly affects the state's constitutional framework by removing this specific provision. As a procedural measure, it does not create new policy but changes the existing constitutional text. (2 sentences)

Maddy summarySB 1456 would prevent courts from enforcing legal decisions that rely on specific foreign laws. This directly affects state courts and legal cases where foreign legal standards are applied in rulings. The bill creates a mechanism to block enforcement of such decisions, though it does not specify which foreign laws or types of rulings are covered. As a procedural bill, it focuses on establishing this restriction rather than changing substantive law.

Maddy summaryThe context provided does not include sufficient details about SB 1267's specific provisions, mechanisms, or affected parties to create a substantive summary. The bill's title and abstract only state it "modifies provisions relating to hospital price transparency laws" without outlining changes to pricing requirements, reporting rules, or covered entities. Without concrete policy details from the bill text or legislative analysis, a factual summary cannot be generated. Procedural details (prefiling, first reading) are noted but do not describe the bill's content.

Maddy summarySR 581 is a procedural bill that changes Senate Rule 59. It allows senators to debate whether to add an emergency clause to bills during consideration. Emergency clauses typically allow bills to take effect immediately upon signing, bypassing standard waiting periods. This change directly affects the Senate's internal rules for handling bills, not the public or specific policies. The bill does not create new policy but alters how the chamber processes emergency designations.

SJR 71 - This constitutional amendment, if approved by the voters, prohibits abortions, except in cases of medical emergencies. The amendment also prohibits the use of surgeries, hormones, or drugs to assist a child with a gender transition. This amendment provides that the right to reproductive freedom shall not be construed to exempt any person, firm, or corporation from civil liability for medical malpractice, negligence, or wrongful death. The General Assembly shall have the authority to enact laws to carry out these provisions. This constitutional amendment is identical to SJR 9 (2025) and similar to the truly agreed to and finally passed HCS/HJR 73 (2025), SCS/SJR 33 (2025), SJR 5 (2025), SJR 17 (2025), SJR 23 (2025), SJR 25 (2025), SJR 27 (2025), SJR 28 (2025), SJR 29 (2025), and SJR 55 (2025). SARAH HASKINS

Maddy summaryThe context provided for SB 1166 does not include the specific provisions, mechanisms, or policy details of the bill. The title and abstract only state it relates to "automated traffic enforcement systems" without describing concrete changes, who it affects, or how it would operate. Without additional legislative text or explanatory materials, a factual summary of its provisions cannot be generated. The bill is currently in early stages (prefiled and first read), but no substantive details are available for analysis.

SB 1167 - This act creates the offense of possession of an abortifacient drug with the intent to induce an abortion on oneself or another person and the offense of delivery of an abortifacient drug with the intent to induce, or otherwise assist in, an abortion on another person. These offenses are Class C felonies. It shall be an affirmative defense for either offense that the possession or delivery of the drug was because of an abortion induced due to a medical emergency. This act is identical to SB 119 (2025). SARAH HASKINS

SB 1165 - This act requires the school board of each school district to establish a policy authorizing students to be excused from class to attend a course in religious or moral instruction taught by an independent entity off school property. Such instruction is defined in the act as a "released time course". The policy shall provide that students may be excused for up to three class periods per week or a maximum of 125 class periods per school year. The student's parent or legal guardian shall provide written consent prior to the student's participation in a released time course. No school district funds, except minimal administrative costs, shall be used, and no school personnel, equipment, or resources shall be involved in providing the instruction. The independent entity offering a released time course shall maintain attendance records and make them available to the school district and its board. Transportation to and from the instruction site shall be the responsibility of the independent entity, the student, or the student's parent or legal guardian. The independent entity or the student's parent or legal guardian shall indemnify and hold the school district harmless regarding any liability arising from student conduct that does not occur on school property under the district's control or supervision, and shall maintain adequate insurance for this purpose. The student shall be responsible for any missed school work. The school district superintendent, principal, or their designees shall have discretion over the scheduling and timing of released time courses, ensuring students are not excused during courses in English language arts, mathematics, science, or U.S. history. The school district, its school board, and the state shall not be liable for students participating in released time courses when the students are not under the district's control or supervision. For purposes of calculating average daily attendance and establishing compliance with the compulsory attendance law, a student attending a released time course shall be considered in attendance in the school district, and the time shall be counted as part of the school day. The school board shall award elective credit for work completed in a released time course, substantiated by a transcript from the independent entity providing the course. The evaluation of the course for credit should be neutral and secular, considering factors including classroom instruction time, course syllabus, assessment methods, and instructor qualifications. The provisions of the act shall not apply to charter schools or to virtual schools. This act is identical to SB 698 (2025) and similar to HB 2157 (2026) and HB 1393 (2025). OLIVIA SHANNON

Maddy summaryThis bill lacks sufficient detail in the provided context to generate a substantive summary. The official abstract only states it "requires disclosure for certain products produced, sold, or distributed in Missouri" without specifying which products, what disclosure is required, or who is affected. No key mechanisms, provisions, or concrete policy changes are described in the available information. Without additional details on the scope of products, disclosure format, or implementation, a factual summary cannot be created. A proper summary would require the full bill text or more detailed legislative description.