Maddy summarySB 1308 revises Missouri's licensing requirements for professional counselors, primarily easing barriers for military spouses and out-of-state professionals. Military spouses (both nonresident and resident) can now obtain a Missouri license without completing standard education, experience, or examination requirements if they meet basic criteria like age and citizenship. The bill also establishes reciprocity for applicants licensed in another state for at least one year, allowing Missouri to waive local requirements if the applicant met equivalent standards in their home state. This change maintains safeguards, such as requiring a license in good standing elsewhere and no disqualifying criminal history, while streamlining licensure for military families and relocating professionals.
Sponsored bills
SB 1180 - This act modifies provisions of law relating to civil procedure. COLLATERAL SOURCE (SECTION 490.715) This act modifies the rule for determining the admissibility of evidence of collateral source payments in civil cases. Currently, parties may introduce evidence of the actual cost of the medical care or treatment rendered to a plaintiff or a patient whose care is at issue. Additionally, this act modifies this provision by providing that in any action where a plaintiff seeks to recover for personal injury, bodily injury, or death, any party may introduce evidence of the actual cost of the medical care or treatment rendered to a plaintiff or to the person whose injury or death the recovery is sought. No party shall introduce evidence of the amount billed for medical care or treatment rendered to a plaintiff or a patient at issue in the case if the amount billed has been discounted pursuant to any contract, price reduction, write-off, or payment less than the amount billed for the medical care or treatment. The actual cost of medical care or treatment rendered to a plaintiff or a patient and any discounts pursuant to a contract, price reduction or write-off shall be admissible as relevant to the potential cost of future treatment. This provision is identical to a provision in SB 268 (2025) and in SB 314 (2025), is substantially similar to HB 273 (2023), SB 975 (2022), HB 1715 (2022), a provision in HCS/SCS/SB 119 (2021), and in the perfected HCS/HB 922 (2021), and is similar to HB 1646 (2026), HB 2405 (2026), HB 69 (2025), HB 965 (2024), HB 147 (2021), HCS/HB 577 (2021), HB 121 (2019), and HB 1407 (2018). INTERSTATE DEPOSITION AND DISCOVERY ACT (SECTIONS 510.500 TO 510.521) This act establishes the Uniform Interstate Depositions and Discovery Act, which provides procedures for out-of-state subpoenas for certain forms of discovery conducted in Missouri. To request a subpoena in Missouri, a party shall submit a foreign subpoena to a clerk of the court in the county in which discovery is sought to be conducted. The clerk shall promptly issue a subpoena, which shall incorporate the terms used in the foreign subpoena and include contact information of the attorneys and any party not represented by an attorney in the proceeding to which the subpoena relates. A request for issuance of a subpoena pursuant to this act shall not constitute an appearance in Missouri courts. The Missouri Supreme Court Rules of Civil Procedure and the laws of this state apply to subpoenas issued pursuant to this act and such subpoenas shall be served in compliance with such rules and laws. Additionally, an application for a protective order or to enforce, quash, or modify a subpoena issued by clerk of this state shall comply with such court rules and laws of this state. However, in applying and construing this act, consideration shall be given to the need to promote uniformity among the states. These provisions shall apply to requests for discovery in cases pending on August 28, 2026. These provisions are identical to provisions in HCS/SB 1067 (2026), SB 1386 (2026), HB 1711 (2026), in HCS/HB 3116 (2026), in HCS/HB 83 (2025), HB 128 (2025), in SCS/HCS/HB 176 (2025), in HCS/SS/SB 221 (2025), in SB 352 (2025), SCS/SB 897 (2024), in SCS/HCS/HB 2064 & HCS#2/HB 1886 (2024), SB 394 (2023), and SB 1005 (2022) and are substantially similar to provisions in HB 1452 (2024), in CCS/HCS/SS/SCS/SB 72 (2023), HB 84 (2023), in SCS/HCS/HBs 994, 52 & 984 (2023), HB 1549 (2022), HB 347 (2021), and HB 2570 (2020). DETERMINATION OF FAULT OF PARTIES AND NONPARTIES IN CIVIL ACTIONS (SECTIONS 537.059, 537.060 & 537.067) This act provides that in all tort actions in which any party contends that damages were caused by the alleged fault of more than one person or entity, the trier of fact shall determine the amount of fault attributable to each person or entity, regardless of whether the person or entity is a party to the action and regardless of whether the person or entity has settled or been released from liability. Fault of another person or entity may be alleged by any party in the action in any claim, counterclaim, cross-claim, or as an affirmative defense. Any determination of fault attributable to a person or entity not a party to the action shall not be binding against or otherwise affect the rights or liabilities of the person or entity. Currently, when an agreement by release, covenant not to sue, or a covenant not to enforce a judgment is given in good faith to one of two or more persons liable in tort for the same injury or wrongful death, the claim for damages shall be reduced by the greater of either the stipulated amount of the agreement or the amount of consideration paid. Further, the agreement shall discharge the tort-feasor to whom it is given from all liability for contribution or noncontractual indemnity, as defined, to any other tort-feasor. This act repeals this provision and provides that in all tort-actions for damages, if the defendant is found to bear 51% or more of the fault, then the defendant shall be jointly and severally liable for the amount of the judgment less the total of any stipulated amount in any release or covenant with any other person or entity alleged to have been at fault or any amount of consideration paid by such person or entity, whichever is greater. These provisions are identical to provisions in SB 314 (2025), SB 1463 (2024), SB 467 (2023), in SB 708 (2023), and in SB 669 (2022) and are similar to provisions in SB 1243 (2022). REFERENCES OF DAMAGES TO JURIES (SECTION 537.092) This act provides that neither party nor the attorneys of the parties in any civil action in which the trier of fact is a jury shall seek or make reference to a specific dollar amount or state a range for the jury to consider with respect to awards for noneconomic damages. This provision is identical to a provision in SB 268 (2025), in SB 314 (2025), and SB 987 (2024) and is substantially similar to HB 2017 (2022) and HCS/HB 148 (2021). DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS IN CIVIL ACTIONS FOR LATENT INJURIES (SECTION 537.870) This act provides that within 30 days of filing a civil action involving a latent injury or disease or a claim for medical monitoring, the claimant shall file a sworn information form specifying the evidence that provides the basis for each claim against each defendant and shall include certain disclosures detailed in the act. The claimant shall supplement the information when the claimant receives information required to be disclosed or when the claimant becomes aware that a prior disclosure was inaccurate or incomplete. Discovery shall not commence against a defendant until the defendant's product, substance, or premises is specifically identified in the disclosures. The court, on motion by a defendant, shall dismiss the action without prejudice for any defendant that was not specifically identified in the disclosures or when a claimant fails to comply with the requirements of this provision. This provision is identical to a provision in SB 268 (2025) and in SB 314 (2025) and is similar to a provision in SB 708 (2023). KATIE O'BRIEN
Maddy summarySB 1273 prevents local governments from blocking charter schools from using properties for education by banning restrictions that prohibit such use. It requires school districts to offer unused school buildings to public entities (like other schools or government agencies) first, with a 60-day notice period and fair market pricing determined through mediation. The bill defines "unused facilities" as buildings not used for education within two years of a school board-approved plan. This directly affects charter schools, school districts, and public entities by changing how empty school properties can be sold or leased.
Maddy summarySB 1274 removes the requirement for notarization of applications and supporting documents for emergency mental health detentions in Missouri. It allows any adult (not requiring legal representation) to file a sworn application alleging a mental health crisis and imminent risk of harm, based on personal observations. The bill simplifies the process by replacing notarization with sworn statements under penalty of perjury, while maintaining the 96-hour detention limit for evaluation. This directly affects individuals seeking emergency mental health evaluations, their family members filing petitions, and peace officers executing detentions. The change aims to streamline access to urgent mental health care without altering the underlying criteria for detention.
Maddy summarySB 1340 prevents health insurers and pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) from discriminating against healthcare providers participating in the federal 340B drug program. It prohibits them from paying covered entities (like hospitals and clinics) less for 340B drugs than other pharmacies, imposing different fees or network restrictions, requiring identification of 340B drugs, or refusing coverage for these drugs. The law requires equal treatment in reimbursement and terms, with violations subject to $5,000 daily civil penalties. This directly affects 340B-covered entities and the insurers/PBMs that pay for their medications.
Maddy summarySB 1338 creates a new state criminal offense for entering Missouri while violating federal immigration law (specifically, 8 U.S.C. § 1325, which prohibits unauthorized entry into the U.S.). If convicted, individuals face a $100,000 fine and a mandatory order of removal from the state. The bill also allows courts to dismiss charges and issue removal orders without a full trial upon request. This law directly affects non-citizens who enter Missouri without federal authorization under U.S. immigration law.
SB 1395 - Unless duly licensed in this state to practice law or law business, it is the unauthorized practice of law for any person, association, partnership, limited liability company, or corporation to provide papers, pleadings, or documents to be used in connection with pending or prospective court or administrative proceedings that are produced or generated through the use of artificial intelligence. KATIE O'BRIEN
Maddy summaryBased solely on the provided context, a detailed summary of SB 1377 cannot be generated. The official abstract ("Modifies provisions relating to erroneous tax deficiencies") and bill title repeat the same phrase without specifying *what* provisions are modified, *how* they are changed, or *who* is directly affected. No concrete policy changes, mechanisms, or affected parties are described in the available information. A full summary would require access to the bill's text or a more detailed abstract.
Maddy summaryThis bill establishes the Uniform Interstate Depositions and Discovery Act, but the provided context does not include the bill's actual provisions, affected parties, or key mechanisms. Without substantive details on what the act requires or how it would function (e.g., specific rules for cross-state legal procedures), a policy summary cannot be generated. The official abstract merely repeats the bill's title without describing its content. For a factual summary, additional legislative text or a policy description would be required.
Maddy summaryBased solely on the provided context, a detailed summary of SB 1385 cannot be generated. The official abstract only states it "modifies provisions relating to workers' compensation" without specifying *what* provisions are changed or *how* they are modified. The bill is currently in early stages (prefiled, first reading), and no concrete policy changes or affected parties are described in the available information. To create an accurate summary, specific details about the bill's provisions would be required.