Rep. Brian Seitz

Maddy summaryHB 109 designates Branson as Missouri's "Live Entertainment Capital" by adding this official title to state code (Section 10.254). This ceremonial bill directly affects Branson's identity and promotional efforts but does not create new funding, regulations, or policy changes. The key mechanism is a symbolic designation in state law, intended to highlight Branson's reputation for live entertainment venues and events. The bill passed the House unanimously (12-0) but was postponed in committee on May 15, 2025.

Maddy summaryThis proposed constitutional amendment would require Missouri voters to approve any new taxes or tax increases through a statewide general election. It defines a "tax increase" as higher tax rates or broader coverage (excluding changes to tax credits or deductions), preventing such changes from taking effect without voter consent. If approved by voters in November 2026, the amendment would mandate that all new taxes or tax hikes require direct voter approval before implementation. This applies to all state-level tax policies affecting Missouri residents and businesses.

Maddy summaryHJR 10 proposes a constitutional amendment to revise Missouri's initiative petition process. It would require 8% of eligible voters in two-thirds of congressional districts to sign petitions for constitutional amendments (down from current thresholds) and 5% for laws, with petitions filed at least six months before elections. The amendment also bans foreign governments or political parties from funding, sponsoring, or supporting initiatives and mandates that constitutional amendments must pass with a majority of votes statewide and in a majority of congressional districts. Additionally, only Missouri residents and U.S. citizens would be eligible to vote on constitutional amendment initiatives.

Maddy summaryHJR 11 proposes a constitutional amendment to change Missouri's rules for approving state constitutional amendments. It would require voters to be U.S. citizens and Missouri residents to vote on amendments, ban foreign governments or political parties from funding or influencing amendment campaigns, and mandate public review of initiative petitions 15 days before they appear on ballots. Amendments would need approval by a majority of votes statewide and in a majority of Missouri's congressional districts to take effect. The bill replaces existing sections of the constitution with these new requirements for how amendments are proposed, funded, and approved.

Maddy summaryHB 883 modifies Missouri's statute of limitations for civil lawsuits related to childhood sexual abuse. It repeals the previous rule requiring such cases to be filed within 10 years of turning 21 or within 3 years of discovering the abuse, and instead allows lawsuits to be filed "at any time." This change directly affects survivors of childhood sexual abuse who wish to pursue civil claims for physical or psychological injuries. The bill applies to all cases filed on or after August 28, 2004, removing time restrictions for these specific claims.

Maddy summaryHB 194 prohibits abortions after a fetal heartbeat is detected, requiring physicians to confirm heartbeat presence (using standard medical practice) before performing most abortions, except in medical emergencies. It modifies state law to define "unborn children" as having rights from conception and mandates detailed abortion reporting, including heartbeat detection results. The bill allows private civil lawsuits against doctors, clinics, or insurers who perform or facilitate abortions without heartbeat confirmation, with penalties of $10,000 per violation. It directly affects healthcare providers performing abortions and insurers covering such procedures, while prohibiting state enforcement of the law.

Maddy summaryHB 111 declares that human life begins at conception and grants unborn children legal rights to life, health, and well-being comparable to other persons under state law. It requires state laws to be interpreted as recognizing these rights for unborn children at every stage of development, from conception until birth, unless overridden by federal law or specific state statutes. The bill explicitly states it does not create legal liability against women for not following prenatal care guidelines. This legislation directly affects legal interpretations of rights for unborn children and would require state statutes to align with these provisions.

Maddy summaryHB 198 corrects a mislabeled title - this bill modifies Missouri's income tax calculation rules, not tip taxation. It adjusts taxpayers' federal adjusted gross income (AGI) to determine Missouri taxable income by adding specific federal tax benefits (like refunds from pandemic-related credits) and subtracting certain exclusions (like interest on U.S. bonds). Key provisions include adding back federal tax refunds that created Missouri tax savings and adjusting depreciation deductions for property purchased in 2002-2003. This directly affects Missouri taxpayers who claimed federal tax benefits impacting their state tax liability, such as pandemic relief refunds or property tax deductions. The changes ensure Missouri tax calculations align with federal adjustments while excluding certain pandemic-related credits.

Maddy summaryHB 197 does not repeal a tax as its title claims; instead, it establishes licensing requirements for bingo equipment suppliers and details tax collection procedures. The bill creates a "Missouri bingo equipment and supplies manufacturer or supplier license" with fingerprint background checks, bond requirements, and application fees (up to $5,000 one-time, $1,000 annual). It specifies tax collection for pull-tab cards (2% of gross receipts) and bingo cards ($0.002 per card), requiring suppliers to remit taxes monthly to the gaming commission fund. The bill also mandates recordkeeping, cash-only sales for delinquent organizations, and license renewal processes. This legislation directly affects bingo equipment suppliers, manufacturers, and hall providers operating in Missouri.

Maddy summaryHB 114 extends the time limit for victims to file civil lawsuits related to childhood sexual abuse. It allows lawsuits to be filed within 20 years after the plaintiff turns 18, or within 3 years of discovering the abuse caused their injury - whichever occurs later. The bill defines "childhood sexual abuse" to include specific sexual assault violations and clarifies that psychological harm alone qualifies as "injury." This change directly affects individuals who experienced abuse as minors and seek civil damages for related injuries. The law would apply to cases filed on or after August 28, 2025.