Photo of Ed McBroom
R Michigan Senate · District 38

Sen. Ed McBroom

Compare
Total votes
2,139
all sessions
Attendance
93%
149 missed
Lower than 89% of chamber peers
With party
88%
of cast votes
Lower than 93% of chamber peers
Bipartisan score
6%
crosses aisle rarely
Higher than 89% of chamber peers
Sponsored
618
bills & resolutions
Near the chamber average
Committees
4
assignments
618 bills and resolutions

Sponsored bills

Total
618
Primary
143
Co-sponsor
475
This page
618
matching current filters
Co-sponsor SB 354
Passed · Michigan Senate · Co-sponsor
Consumer protection: solicitations; provisions relating to the regulation of home solicitations and telephone solicitations; remove telephone solicitations. Amends title & secs. 1 & 3 of 1971 PA 227 (MCL 445.111 & 445.113) & repeals secs. 1a - 1e of 1971 PA 227 (MCL 445.111a - 445.111e). TIE BAR WITH: SB 0351'25

Maddy summarySB 354 amends Michigan's 1971 Home Solicitation Sales Act by removing telephone solicitation regulations that were previously part of the law. It repeals sections MCL 445.111a through 445.111e (which governed telephone solicitations) and updates the title and key sections (MCL 445.111 and 445.113) to reflect this change. This bill directly affects businesses that make phone solicitations by eliminating specific regulatory requirements they previously had to follow. The key mechanism is the repeal of the telephone solicitation provisions, streamlining the law to focus only on home solicitation rules. The bill does not create new requirements but removes existing telephone solicitation rules from the statute.

Passed Feb 3, 2026 1 co-sponsor
Primary SB 355
Passed · Michigan Senate · Lead sponsor
Communications: telecommunications; provisions relating to telephone solicitations: repeal. Repeals 1913 PA 206 (MCL 484.125). TIE BAR WITH: SB 0351'25

Maddy summarySB 355 repeals a 1913 Michigan law (MCL 484.125) that regulated telephone companies as public utilities and set rules for their operations. The bill removes outdated requirements about telephone company consolidation, equipment use, and Public Service Commission oversight. This directly affects telephone companies and state regulators by eliminating historical regulatory provisions. The repeal is conditional on another bill (SB 351) being enacted, but does not create new rules or impact current services.

Passed Feb 3, 2026 0 co-sponsors
Co-sponsor SB 353
Passed · Michigan Senate · Co-sponsor
Consumer protection: solicitations; unfair trade practices; revise practices relating to deceptive telephone solicitations. Amends sec. 3 of 1976 PA 331 (MCL 445.903). TIE BAR WITH: SB 0351'25

Maddy summarySB 353 amends Michigan's Consumer Protection Act to strengthen rules against deceptive telephone solicitations. It specifically requires businesses to clearly disclose environmental marketing claims (like "recycled" or "biodegradable") and to provide full written terms for prizes offered in exchange for attending sales presentations. The bill directly affects businesses making phone calls to consumers, mandating transparency to prevent misleading claims about product origins, environmental benefits, or prize conditions. These changes update existing law to address modern deceptive practices in phone-based sales.

Passed Feb 3, 2026 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor SB 352
Passed · Michigan Senate · Co-sponsor
Civil procedure: costs and fees; filing fees for attorney general in enforcing the telephone solicitation act; prohibit. Amends sec. 2529 of 1961 PA 236 (MCL 600.2529). TIE BAR WITH: SB 0351'25

Maddy summarySB 352 removes a $150 filing fee requirement for cases where the Attorney General enforces the Telephone Solicitation Act (specifically actions under section 33 of that law). This change directly affects the Attorney General’s office when pursuing violations of Michigan’s telephone solicitation rules. The bill amends Michigan’s court fee statute (MCL 600.2529) to exclude these enforcement actions from standard civil filing fees. As a result, the Attorney General would no longer need to pay this $150 fee when initiating such cases in court.

Passed Feb 3, 2026 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor SB 351
Passed · Michigan Senate · Co-sponsor
Consumer protection: marketing and advertising; telephone solicitation act; create. Creates new act. TIE BAR WITH: SB 0352'25, SB 0353'25, SB 0354'25, SB 0355'25

Maddy summarySB 351 would create a new law governing telephone marketing calls and solicitations. It has been introduced by Senator Mary Cavanagh and referred to the Finance, Insurance, and Consumer Protection Committee. The bill's specific provisions (such as required disclosures, opt-out mechanisms, or enforcement details) are not described in the provided context. As a procedural bill establishing a new regulatory framework, it directly affects businesses making phone solicitations and consumers receiving such calls. Details about its concrete policy changes remain unavailable based on the current information.

Passed Feb 3, 2026 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor SB 82
Passed · Michigan Senate · Co-sponsor
Courts: judges; personal information and physical safety protections for judges, their families, and household members; enhance. Creates new act.

Maddy summarySB 82 creates new legal protections to enhance the safety of judges, their families, and household members. The bill directly affects judges and their immediate household by limiting public access to personal information like home addresses and phone numbers. Key provisions require courts to implement measures that restrict the disclosure of such details and establish protocols for physical safety. This legislation aims to strengthen existing safeguards against potential threats by making personal information less accessible to the public.

Passed Dec 18, 2025 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor SB 756
In committee · Michigan Senate · Co-sponsor
State agencies (existing): environment, Great Lakes, and energy; circumstances under which an officer of the department may enter private property; limit. Amends 1994 PA 451 (MCL 324.101 - 324.90106) by adding sec. 1506.

Maddy summarySB 756 amends Michigan's Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Act to require Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy officers to obtain a warrant or explicit permission from a property owner or lessee before entering private property. This directly affects Michigan property owners and renters by limiting government access to their land without consent or legal authorization. The key provision adds Section 1506, establishing a clear requirement for warrants or permission during enforcement activities under the act. The bill does not change environmental regulations but modifies how department officials may conduct on-site inspections. It was introduced on December 17, 2025, and referred to the Civil Rights, Judiciary, and Public Safety Committee.

In committee Dec 17, 2025 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor SB 755
In committee · Michigan Senate · Co-sponsor
Natural resources: other; circumstances under which a conservation officer may enter private property; limit. Amends sec. 1602 of 1994 PA 451 (MCL 324.1602) & adds sec. 1507.

Maddy summarySB 755 limits when conservation officers can enter private property without permission. It requires officers to have either the property owner’s consent, a court warrant, or specific circumstances (like observing distressed wildlife or responding to an immediate public safety threat). This directly affects landowners by restricting officer access and conservation officers by defining their entry protocols. The bill does not change existing powers for officers to search boats, vehicles, or equipment without warrants, as clarified in amended Section 1602.

In committee Dec 17, 2025 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor SCR 10
Passed · Michigan Senate · Co-sponsor
A concurrent resolution of tribute offered as a memorial for Donald Koivisto, former member of the Michigan Senate and Michigan House of Representatives.

Maddy summaryThis is a memorial resolution honoring Donald Koivisto, a former Michigan State Senator (1990-2002) and House Representative (1981-1986). The resolution expresses the legislature's tribute to his service, highlighting his dedication to the Upper Peninsula, farming community, and bipartisan collaboration. It was unanimously adopted by both chambers as a formal expression of respect for his legacy. The resolution has no policy impact - it solely commemorates his public service.

Passed Dec 16, 2025 1 co-sponsor
Primary SB 734
In committee · Michigan Senate · Lead sponsor
Legislature: committees; membership on a bipartisan, bicameral oversight committee to review departmental or agency audits; modify. Amends title of 2003 PA 1 (MCL 13.101) & adds sec. 2. TIE BAR WITH: SJR G'25

Maddy summarySB 734 creates a bipartisan, bicameral joint oversight committee to review state agency audits. It requires the committee to have 8 members (max 4 from one party), appointed equally by House and Senate leadership, and mandates quarterly meetings to examine all completed audit reports from the auditor general. The committee can make recommendations to the legislature but cannot issue binding orders, and the bill’s effectiveness depends on a separate constitutional amendment (SJR G'25) being adopted. This is a procedural change affecting how audits are reviewed, not a policy impacting citizens or services.

In committee Dec 10, 2025 0 co-sponsors
Showing 51 to 60 of 618 bills
Previous 1 5 6 7 62 Next