Photo of Penelope Tsernoglou
D Michigan House · District 75 On the 2026 ballot

Rep. Penelope Tsernoglou

Compare
Total votes
1,836
all sessions
Attendance
100%
of floor votes
Higher than 83% of chamber peers
With party
98%
of cast votes
Near the chamber average
Bipartisan score
1%
crosses aisle rarely
Near the chamber average
Sponsored
1,110
bills & resolutions
Higher than 81% of chamber peers
Committees
3
assignments
1,110 bills and resolutions

Sponsored bills

Total
1,110
Primary
65
Co-sponsor
1,045
This page
1,110
matching current filters
Co-sponsor HB 4558
In committee · Michigan House · Co-sponsor
Crime victims: notices; crime victim's rights act; amend to reference rights of crime victims in certain prisoner resentencing. Amends secs. 13 & 41 of 1985 PA 87 (MCL 780.763 & 780.791).

Maddy summaryThis bill amends Michigan's Crime Victim's Rights Act to ensure that victims of crime receive specific notices regarding their rights during the resentencing of prisoners. It requires prosecutors to inform victims about their ability to submit impact statements detailing physical, emotional, and economic harm, as well as their views on restitution and sentencing. The legislation also mandates that victims be notified about the availability of pre-sentence reports and the details of upcoming sentencing hearings. Additionally, these notification requirements apply to cases involving juveniles, ensuring consistent treatment of victims across different types of criminal proceedings.

In committee Dec 11, 2024 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor HB 6017
In committee · Michigan House · Co-sponsor
Crimes: animals; cross-reference in revised judicature act; update. Amends sec. 2950 of 1961 PA 236 (MCL 600.2950).

Maddy summaryThis bill updates the Revised Judicature Act to clarify how existing personal protection orders apply to animal abuse cases. It directly affects individuals seeking legal protection from domestic violence or stalking by explicitly adding provisions that allow courts to restrain a respondent from injuring, killing, or neglecting an animal owned by the petitioner. The key mechanism involves expanding the list of prohibited behaviors to include specific acts against pets intended to cause mental distress or exert control over the victim. Additionally, the bill ensures that courts cannot refuse to issue an order solely because there is no police or medical report, while prohibiting mutual orders unless both parties independently petition for them. These changes aim to strengthen legal recourse for victims by formally recognizing animal cruelty as a relevant factor in domestic safety restraining orders.

In committee Dec 11, 2024 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor HB 5463
In committee · Michigan House · Co-sponsor
Economic development: other; center for microenterprise development; create. Amends 1984 PA 270 (MCL 125.2001 - 125.2094) by adding ch. 7A.

Maddy summaryThis bill creates a new chapter within the Michigan Strategic Fund Act to establish a formal Center for Microenterprise Development. The legislation defines a microenterprise as a small business with 10 or fewer employees and outlines the role of nonprofit organizations that provide training, technical assistance, or loans to these businesses. By adding specific definitions for terms like "economic development project" and "green chemistry," the bill sets the framework for the fund to support small-scale industrial, commercial, and agricultural ventures. The changes amend existing state laws to ensure the fund can officially recognize and assist these smaller enterprises through structured development programs.

In committee Dec 10, 2024 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor HB 5724
Passed · Michigan House · Co-sponsor
Courts: judges; personal information and physical safety protections for judges, their families, and household members; enhance. Creates new act.

Maddy summaryThis bill, known as the Judicial Protection Act, establishes new safety and privacy measures for judges in Michigan and their immediate family members. It allows judges to request that government agencies and private entities stop sharing specific personal details, such as home addresses, phone numbers, and financial information, with the public. To enforce this, the law creates a formal process where judges can submit written requests to remove or prevent the posting of this sensitive data. The protections apply to state, federal, and tribal court judges within the state, as well as their spouses, children, parents, and other relatives living at the same address.

Passed Dec 10, 2024 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor HB 5884
In committee · Michigan House · Co-sponsor
Marihuana: licenses; certain licenses for medical and recreational marihuana; modify. Amends title & secs. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 9a, 11a, 12, 13, 14, 15 & 17 of 2018 IL 1 (MCL 333.27951 et seq.); adds secs. 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 24a, 25, 26, 27 & 28 & repeals secs. 10, 11 & 16 of 2018 IL 1 (MCL 333.27960 et seq.).

Maddy summaryThis bill amends the Michigan Regulation and Taxation of Marihuana Act to update rules governing licenses for medical and recreational marijuana businesses. It directly affects individuals and companies involved in the cultivation, processing, testing, transportation, and sale of marijuana and industrial hemp by modifying existing requirements and adding new sections to the law. The key provisions include changes to how licenses are issued, adjustments to tax structures on commercial facilities, and updates to definitions regarding product safety and the roles of state regulatory agencies. Additionally, the legislation repeals certain previous sections while establishing new ones to ensure the safety of products and the security of licensed premises.

In committee Dec 10, 2024 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor HB 5885
In committee · Michigan House · Co-sponsor
Medical marihuana: other; medical marihuana facilities licensing act; repeal. Repeals 2016 PA 281 (MCL 333.27101 - 333.27801).

Maddy summaryThis bill proposes to repeal the Medical Marihuana Facilities Licensing Act, which currently regulates the licensing and operation of medical marijuana facilities in Michigan. The repeal would take effect on March 1, 2026, removing the existing legal framework that governs these businesses. However, the bill includes a condition stating that it will only become law if a separate, related bill is also enacted into legislation. If passed, the change would eliminate the specific licensing requirements and oversight procedures established by the 2016 act.

In committee Dec 10, 2024 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor HB 5304
Passed · Michigan House · Co-sponsor
Traffic control: traffic regulation; requirement to drive in the right-hand lane of a roadway with 2 lanes for travel in 1 direction; modify. Amends sec. 634 of 1949 PA 300 (MCL 257.634).

Maddy summaryThis bill modifies Michigan's vehicle code to clarify lane usage rules for drivers on roadways with two or more lanes traveling in the same direction. It requires vehicles to stay in the extreme right-hand lane unless passing, turning left, avoiding streetcars, or responding to construction. The law specifically restricts heavy trucks and trailers from using any lane other than the rightmost one on freeways with three or more lanes, except when making turns or avoiding hazards. Local governments are also prohibited from passing ordinances that contradict these specific lane assignment rules. Violations of these requirements are classified as civil infractions.

Passed Dec 10, 2024 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor HB 5582
In committee · Michigan House · Co-sponsor
Campaign finance: public disclosure; certain political nonprofit organizations; define. Amends secs. 5 & 7 of 1976 PA 388 (MCL 169.205 & 169.207).

Maddy summaryThis bill updates the Michigan Campaign Finance Act by clarifying definitions for political terms and expanding reporting requirements for specific nonprofit groups. It formally defines "501(c)(4) organizations" and "527 organizations" as entities that are controlled, directed, or staffed by candidates, elected officials, their appointees, or their family members. Additionally, the legislation provides new definitions for concepts like "election cycle," "honorarium," and "fund raising event" to ensure consistent application of campaign finance rules. These changes directly affect political candidates, public officials, and the nonprofit organizations that interact with them by establishing clearer boundaries for what must be disclosed to the public.

In committee Dec 5, 2024 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor HB 6227
In committee · Michigan House · Co-sponsor
Juveniles: criminal procedure; legal representation and electronic recording requirements during custodial interrogation for juveniles treated as adults; provide for. Amends secs. 8 & 9, ch. III of 1927 PA 175 (MCL 763.8 & 763.9) & adds sec. 8a to ch. III.

Maddy summaryThis bill requires law enforcement to make time-stamped, audiovisual recordings of interrogations involving juveniles who are treated as adults for major felonies. It mandates that an attorney must be present during these custodial interrogations and establishes that any self-incriminating response from a juvenile is presumed inadmissible if it is not electronically recorded. The legislation also specifies that prosecutors must provide copies of recorded statements to defense counsel and instructs juries to consider the absence of a recording when evaluating evidence if one was not made. These changes aim to ensure transparency and legal representation for young suspects facing serious charges.

In committee Dec 5, 2024 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor HB 6226
In committee · Michigan House · Co-sponsor
Juveniles: criminal procedure; legal representation and electronic recording requirements during custodial interrogation for juveniles; provide for. Amends sec. 1, ch. XIIA of 1939 PA 288 (MCL 712A.1) & adds sec. 17e to ch. XIIA.

Maddy summaryThis bill requires that a juvenile have an attorney present during any interrogation while in custodial detention, and it prohibits these minors from waiving their right to legal representation. Additionally, the law states that any self-incriminating statements made by a juvenile during such an interrogation are inadmissible as evidence if they were not represented by counsel at the time. These provisions directly affect juveniles under the age of 18 who are subject to delinquency petitions and law enforcement questioning in a detention setting.

In committee Dec 5, 2024 1 co-sponsor
Showing 591 to 600 of 1,110 bills
Previous 1 … 59 60 61 … 111 Next