Rep. Reggie Miller

Maddy summaryHB 4270 amends Michigan's Campaign Finance Act to clarify disclosure requirements for certain political nonprofits. It redefines "501(c)(4)" and "527" organizations to include those controlled by state candidates, elected officials, appointed officials, or their family members. These nonprofits would then be required to disclose their funding sources and activities, directly affecting organizations with ties to Michigan's political figures. The bill takes effect January 1, 2027, pending passage of companion legislation (HB 4269).

Maddy summaryHB 4271 modifies Michigan's campaign finance law to treat all independent committees established, financed, maintained, or controlled by a candidate for the Michigan House or Senate as a single committee for contribution limit purposes. This means a candidate cannot circumvent contribution limits by creating multiple committees under their name; all such committees will be counted together. The bill explicitly excludes House and Senate political party caucus committees from this rule. Violations carry penalties including up to 3 years in prison or a $5,000 fine for individuals, or a $10,000 fine for organizations. The bill directly affects candidates running for state legislative office who use independent committees.

Maddy summaryHB 4268 amends Michigan's Campaign Finance Act to give the Secretary of State authority to seek court orders (injunctive relief) to stop campaign finance violations. It adds specific circumstances for waiving late filing fees, such as medical emergencies, natural disasters, or loss of records, and requires the Secretary to provide public notice and comment periods for official interpretations of the law. The bill also establishes clear deadlines for handling complaints about violations, including requirements for signed complaints with factual certifications and structured timelines for responses and rebuttals. These changes aim to improve enforcement transparency and streamline compliance for campaign finance reporters.

Maddy summaryThis resolution designates March 21, 2025, as Rosie the Riveter Day in Michigan to honor women who worked in factories during World War II, particularly in Michigan's Willow Run and Detroit facilities. It does not create new laws or obligations but encourages residents, schools, businesses, and organizations to observe the day through educational activities and community events. The bill specifically recognizes these women's contributions to wartime production and their role in advancing workplace equality. It is a symbolic gesture with no direct regulatory impact on individuals or entities.

Maddy summaryThis resolution designates March 21, 2025, as "Abolitionist Day" in Michigan to honor the state's history in the anti-slavery movement. It specifically recognizes Laura Smith Haviland, an Adrian, Michigan abolitionist who aided freedom seekers via the Underground Railroad and was inducted into the National Abolition Hall of Fame. The resolution has no policy or funding impact - it is purely commemorative. It directly affects Michigan residents by establishing an official state observance day. The resolution was introduced and adopted by the Michigan House on March 20, 2025.

Maddy summaryThis resolution directs the Clerk of the House to present nine specific bills - passed by both legislative chambers in December 2024 and "enrolled" (formally prepared for the Governor) - to the Governor. It follows a court ruling (February 2025) that confirmed Michigan’s Constitution requires all passed bills to be presented to the Governor within 14 days, rejecting the House’s prior refusal to act. The resolution overrides a previous House attempt (Resolution 41) to delay this process and mandates immediate compliance with the court’s order. It affects the House Clerk, Governor, and the nine bills’ legislative timeline, ensuring they can proceed toward becoming law.

Maddy summaryThis is a symbolic House resolution (not a law) introduced in Michigan. It formally supports the U.S. Supreme Court's *Obergefell v. Hodges* ruling, which established same-sex marriage as a constitutional right. The resolution reaffirms that marriage should be defined by constitutional principles like equality and due process, not by historical or religious definitions. It specifically references Michigan's state constitution (Article I, Section 25) as conflicting with the *Obergefell* decision. The resolution has no legal effect and does not change any existing laws or policies.

Maddy summaryHB 4206 modifies Michigan's deer hunting regulations by allowing hunters with a valid base license to obtain two antlerless deer permits annually at no cost, effective March 1, 2014. The bill also establishes a $5 nonrefundable application fee for additional antlerless permits and requires kill tags (with license numbers) to be issued with each permit. It permits residents to purchase a second deer license (without senior discounts) and nonresidents to buy additional licenses for $170, with department-designated hunting zones. This directly affects Michigan hunters holding base licenses, reducing their cost for antlerless permits while maintaining standard licensing fees for regular licenses.

Maddy summaryHB 4173 is a supplemental funding bill that allocates state money specifically for testing commercial poultry facilities and backyard flocks in Michigan for H5N1 bird flu. It directly affects poultry farmers, commercial hatcheries, and state agricultural testing labs by providing resources to conduct these tests. The key mechanism is creating a new appropriation (funding line) within the state budget for this purpose, separate from regular funding. This bill focuses solely on enabling testing capacity, not on disease prevention or other policy changes.

Maddy summaryThis proposed constitutional amendment (HJR F) would remove gender-specific language from two Michigan constitutional provisions. It would repeal Article I, Section 25 - which defined marriage as "the union of one man and one woman" - and amend Article X, Section 1 to make property rights language gender-neutral. If approved, it would eliminate the constitutional ban on same-sex marriage and update outdated references to gender in property law. The amendment would require voter approval at the next general election. (Note: The bill is currently in committee referral, with no further action taken as of March 2025.)