Issue · Technology

Technology

Every technology bill, vote, and legislator stance in Michigan, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
130
2025-2026 Regular Session
Top supporter
Curt VanderWall
100% support rate
Top opponent
Thomas Albert
7% support rate
Ranked legislators
10
5 support · 5 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving technology in Michigan

Legislators moving technology in Michigan
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Votes
Curt VanderWall
Curt VanderWall House · District 102
R
Strong +
100% 65
Sarah Lightner
Sarah Lightner House · District 45
R
Strong +
100% 65
J.R. Roth
J.R. Roth House · District 104
R
Strong +
100% 62
Matt Maddock
Matt Maddock House · District 51
R
Strong +
100% 65
Greg Markkanen
Greg Markkanen House · District 110
R
Strong +
100% 65
Thomas Albert
Thomas Albert Senate · District 18
R
Strong −
7% 40
Dylan Wegela
Dylan Wegela House · District 26
D
Strong −
8% 65
Veronica Paiz
Veronica Paiz House · District 10
D
Strong −
10% 55
Kimberly Edwards
Kimberly Edwards House · District 12
D
Strong −
12% 49
Jonathan Lindsey
Jonathan Lindsey Senate · District 17
R
Strong −
13% 40
Showing 21–30 of 130 bills

All technology bills

in committee · Michigan · Senate Jun 24, 2026

SB 1077: Labor: fair employment practices; use of electronic monitoring or automated decisions tools by an employer; prohibit except for certain purposes. Creates new act.

This bill, known as the Responsible Artificial Intelligence Security for Employees Act, restricts how employers in Michigan can use automated decision-making tools and electronic monitoring systems for their workforce. It generally prohibits using these technologies for employment decisions like hiring or firing, except when screening large volumes of applications based on specific job criteria. Employers are only allowed to monitor employees for specific purposes such as ensuring job function completion, monitoring production quality, or protecting health and safety, and they must obtain written consent from every employee before using such tools. The legislation also mandates that employers provide clear notice of monitoring, maintain accurate data, allow employees to correct their records, and conduct impact assessments to ensure these tools do not negatively affect individuals based on protected characteristics.
passed both · Michigan · House Jul 1, 2026

HB 6098: Consumer protection: other; use of surveillance pricing in the sale of certain goods and services; prohibit. Amends sec. 3 of 1976 PA 331 (MCL 445.903) & adds sec. 3q. TIE BAR WITH: HB 6099'26

This bill amends the Michigan Consumer Protection Act to explicitly prohibit merchants from using "surveillance pricing," a practice where prices are dynamically adjusted based on data gathered from monitoring individual customers. The legislation directly affects businesses selling goods and services by adding a new provision that makes it unlawful to charge higher prices to consumers who are being tracked or monitored. By incorporating this specific prohibition into the state's existing list of unfair trade practices, the bill aims to prevent deceptive pricing tactics that exploit consumer data.
Sub-Topics Consumer Data Protection Tags Consumer Protection
in committee · Michigan · House Jun 30, 2026

HB 6140: Public employees and officers: other; nondisclosure agreements related to the construction of data centers; prohibit. Creates new act. TIE BAR WITH: HB 6135'26, HB 6141'26, HB 6137'26, HB 6138'26, HB 6142'26, HB 6139'26

This bill, known as the Data Center Transparency Act, prohibits elected officials in Michigan from signing nondisclosure agreements that keep data center construction details secret. It specifically applies to contracts between local governments and data center owners where the facility is built in exchange for tax incentives. Under the law, any such agreement attempting to hide information about the project would be considered void and unenforceable, while still allowing the redaction of specific intellectual property details. The measure requires that all related bills be passed for this provision to take effect.
Tags Government Transparency
in committee · Michigan · Senate May 7, 2026

SB 948: Labor: fair employment practices; requirement for an employee to access or respond to work-related communications outside of usual work hours; prohibit. Creates new act.

This bill, known as the Workplace Employee Boundaries Act, prohibits employers from requiring employees to check work emails, texts, or calls outside of their regular working hours. It allows workers to set specific times when they are available for work-related messages and protects them from retaliation, such as firing or threatening them, if they do not respond during off-hours. The law also bans employers from forcing employees to give up these protections as a condition of getting a job and provides for fines and extra pay for violations. Exceptions exist for emergencies, urgent notices to all staff, and situations where employees are already paid to be on call.
Sub-Topics Labor Standards
in committee · Michigan · House May 13, 2026

HB 5950: Traffic control: driver license; communication impediment decal for vehicles; provide for. Amends sec. 5 of 2008 PA 23 (MCL 28.305). TIE BAR WITH: HB 5949'26

This bill amends Michigan's enhanced driver license and identification card laws to allow individuals to voluntarily include a "communication impediment" designation on their ID. The designation is intended for people with conditions like deafness or autism that may hinder communication with police officers. Under the new rules, law enforcement personnel with authorized access to a specific state network would be able to view this designation. The bill also clarifies privacy protections, ensuring that Social Security numbers and other personal data are not printed on the front of the card. Additionally, it establishes procedures for the Secretary of State to cancel or revoke this designation if the underlying health condition no longer exists, following a notice and hearing process for the cardholder.
in committee · Michigan · Senate May 20, 2026

SB 991: Trade: consumer goods and services; use of certain algorithms and protected class data to set prices; prohibit. Amends sec. 3 of 1976 PA 331 (MCL 445.903) & adds sec. 3j.

Senate Bill 991 amends Michigan's Consumer Protection Act to prohibit businesses from using certain algorithms and protected class data to set prices. This law directly affects companies that sell goods or services by banning the practice of adjusting prices based on factors like race, age, or other personal characteristics. The bill adds a new section to the statute to explicitly make this pricing behavior unlawful, ensuring that consumers are not charged different amounts for the same items based on their personal data.
Sub-Topics Consumer Data Protection Data Privacy Tags Consumer Protection
in committee · Michigan · House May 20, 2026

HB 5992: Taxation: administration; film credits; restore. Amends secs. 29, 29a, 29b & 29d of 1984 PA 270 (MCL 125.2029 et seq.) & repeals sec. 29h of 1984 PA 270 (MCL 125.2029h.). TIE BAR WITH: HB 5991'26

HB 5992 restores and updates the legal framework for the Michigan Film and Digital Media Office, which is responsible for promoting the state as a location for film, television, and digital media production. The bill redefines key terms to include various forms of media and outlines the office's duties, such as assisting producers with location scouting, providing technical support, and coordinating with local and federal agencies. Additionally, it removes a section related to film credits, aligning the legislation with current administrative practices.
Sub-Topics Tax Incentives
in committee · Michigan · House Apr 23, 2026

HB 5850: Water supply: systems; cyber-physical security and operational technology protections for public water systems; provide for. Amends sec. 21 of 1976 PA 399 (MCL 325.1021) & adds sec. 8a.

This bill requires public water systems in Michigan to implement security measures against cyberattacks, physical threats, and system compromises. It mandates the creation of risk-based cybersecurity programs aligned with national standards and the use of specific safety features, such as redundant cooling, manual overrides, and network segmentation. Additionally, the legislation obligates these systems to maintain incident response and disaster recovery plans that outline roles, communication procedures, and coordination with emergency responders. Violations of these new requirements are subject to civil fines of up to $25,000 per day, while other violations of the Safe Drinking Water Act remain punishable by existing misdemeanor penalties.
Sub-Topics Cybersecurity
in committee · Michigan · House Apr 15, 2026

HB 5793: Criminal procedure: sentencing guidelines; sentencing guidelines for interfering with the operational technology of a covered critical infrastructure facility; provide for. Amends sec. 16s, ch. XVII of 1927 PA 175 (MCL 777.16s). TIE BAR WITH: HB 5792'26

HB 5793 amends Michigan's sentencing guidelines to address crimes involving interference with the operational technology of covered critical infrastructure facilities. The bill directly affects individuals who attempt to disrupt systems essential to vital services such as power, water, and communications. By updating the Code of Criminal Procedure, it establishes specific sentencing parameters for these offenses, ensuring that penalties align with the severity of attacks on critical infrastructure. This change is part of a paired legislative effort with HB 5792 to strengthen protections for essential services.
Sub-Topics Sentencing
in committee · Michigan · House Apr 23, 2026

HB 5847: Public utilities: electric utilities; cyber-physical security and operational technology protections for electric utility facilities and natural gas utilities; provide for. Amends 1939 PA 3 (MCL 460.1 - 460.11) by adding 10ii.

This bill requires electric and natural gas utilities in Michigan to prove they have security measures in place to protect critical infrastructure from cyber and physical threats. Utilities must also maintain a risk-based program to identify and mitigate these risks. If approved by the state commission, utilities can pass the cost of these enhanced security investments onto retail customers through a specific fee. The bill also mandates that sensitive information regarding security vulnerabilities and protective systems remain confidential and exempt from public disclosure.
Sub-Topics Oil & Gas
Showing 21 to 30 of 130 bills
Previous 1 2 3 4 13 Next