HB 4467, titled the "protecting minors from chemical and surgical mutilation act," prohibits health care professionals from providing specific medical treatments to individuals under 18 years old. It bans administering puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, and certain surgeries when performed to alter a minor's physical appearance or affirm their psychological perception of sex if inconsistent with their biological sex. The bill includes exceptions for minors with medically verifiable disorders of sex development or for treating complications from previous gender-transition procedures. Individuals alleging a violation may bring civil actions for remedies, and the Attorney General is authorized to enforce the act.
HB 5044 requires Michigan school districts and public charter schools to create policies by July 2026 allowing students with medically necessary treatment prescribed by healthcare providers to receive that care during school hours. The policy must include parent notices about federal disability rights (under Section 504 and the ADA), establish a 30-day meeting process for treatment requests, and specify when schools can deny requests (only if it causes a "fundamental alteration" or "undue burden"). Schools must also report annual data on treatment requests and denials to the state education department. This directly affects students with medical or mental health conditions requiring in-school care and school staff responsible for implementing the policy.
This bill creates a new regulatory framework for kratom products in the state. It establishes rules governing the distribution, sale, and manufacturing of kratom, though the specific provisions (like licensing requirements, labeling standards, or product restrictions) are not detailed in the provided context. The bill directly affects kratom manufacturers, distributors, retailers, and consumers by subjecting these activities to new state regulations. As the bill is in early committee review (referred to Regulatory Reform after a substitute amendment), its final content and scope remain pending. The context does not provide details on the specific mechanisms or who is directly affected beyond the general regulatory intent.
This bill modifies Michigan's laws regarding land disputes involving public highways and state-owned property. It removes time limits and legal defenses like adverse possession for cases where the state or local governments try to reclaim land used as public roads. Additionally, it establishes a legal presumption that land has been officially designated as a public highway if it has been recorded as such for at least 10 years, shifting the burden of proof to anyone challenging that status.
This bill extends the time limit for survivors of criminal sexual conduct to file civil lawsuits for damages, raising the maximum age to file from 28 to 42 and adding a seven-year window based on when the injury is discovered. It also creates a special revival window for claims that were previously barred, allowing victims who were minors between 1997 and the bill's effective date to sue if the alleged perpetrator was convicted and admitted to abusing their authority or engaging in unethical medical conduct. Additionally, the legislation sets a cap of $1.5 million in damages for each incident involving a single defendant in these specific cases. The law applies to incidents of criminal sexual conduct regardless of whether a criminal prosecution was ever brought or resulted in a conviction, provided the civil suit is filed within the new extended deadlines.
This bill amends state law to clarify that obstructions or encroachments on public highways, such as fences or buildings, do not grant the owner any legal right to that land. It also ensures that if a county road commission fails to order the removal of an obstruction, this inaction cannot be interpreted as an official decision to abandon the road. The legislation directly affects property owners who build on road rights of way and local road commissions responsible for maintaining public highways. By updating the existing statute, the bill aims to prevent legal confusion regarding land ownership and road maintenance responsibilities.
This bill establishes a new community solar program in Michigan, allowing residents to subscribe to local solar projects and receive credits on their electricity bills. It defines specific terms for these facilities and subscribers, while also categorizing certain areas as "environmental justice communities" based on factors like low-income populations and existing pollution. The legislation requires the state energy commission to create rules that facilitate the creation and financing of these solar projects, prioritizing those that benefit environmental justice communities. Additionally, the bill mandates simple, one-page disclosure forms for all subscription contracts to ensure customers clearly understand the terms before signing.
HB 6042 is a supplemental appropriations bill that allocates state funds for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026. The legislation specifically includes funding for the Macomb County interceptor, a project aimed at managing wastewater or stormwater in that region. It also provides financial support to various state departments, the judicial branch, and the legislative branch. The bill sets conditions on how these funds can be spent and was introduced by Representative Denise Mentzer in June 2026.
This bill creates a specific exception to governmental immunity in Michigan, allowing public universities, colleges, and school districts to be sued for criminal sexual conduct committed by their employees. Under the new provisions, an institution can be held liable if it was negligent in hiring, supervising, or training the employee, or if it knew or should have known about the misconduct and failed to report it to law enforcement. Additionally, liability may arise if the school district had prior knowledge of the employee's history of sexual misconduct and did not intervene to prevent further acts. The law clarifies that a criminal conviction is not required for a lawsuit to proceed, ensuring that victims can seek civil remedies even if the perpetrator avoids criminal charges.
HB 6054 clarifies and updates Michigan's existing laws regarding returnable beverage containers, specifically defining terms like "returnable container" and "reverse vending machine" to ensure consistency in enforcement. The bill introduces new restrictions on manufacturers selling nonalcoholic beverages in 12-ounce metal and glass containers that are not designated for return, applying these rules based on sales volume and redemption rates tracked by the Department of Treasury. These sales restrictions are set to take effect 90 days and 450 days after the bill becomes law, with separate thresholds established for the Upper Peninsula. By amending existing sections and adding new ones, the legislation aims to streamline regulations on bottle deposits and recycling without changing the fundamental requirement for a 10-cent deposit on returnable containers.
This bill amends Michigan's existing laws regarding the abandonment and discontinuance of county roads to clarify the procedures local road commissions must follow. It outlines how county road commissioners can voluntarily give up control of a road, returning it to the municipality, or completely abandon it, which would remove it from the public highway system entirely. The legislation also details the specific steps required to process these actions, including mandatory public hearings, official notice periods, and the conditions under which residents can petition for a road's removal. Additionally, the bill addresses how road names are assigned and changed, as well as the rules for counties to share responsibilities for roads that cross county lines.
HB 6049 modifies the statute of limitations for civil lawsuits involving criminal sexual conduct in Michigan, extending the time a victim has to file a claim to 10 years. This change applies to cases where the alleged conduct falls under specific criminal sexual offenses, regardless of whether a criminal prosecution was ever filed or resulted in a conviction. The bill defines "criminal sexual conduct" to include acts prohibited under specific sections of the Michigan penal code and clarifies that a dating relationship involves frequent, intimate associations with an expectation of affection. By updating these timelines, the legislation ensures that survivors have a longer window to seek damages for injuries sustained from such conduct.