Maddy summaryThis bill expands eligibility for in-state tuition rates and state financial aid at Massachusetts public colleges and universities to high school graduates who have attended and graduated from a local high school for at least three years, regardless of their immigration status. It specifically excludes nonimmigrant aliens on certain federal visa categories and the University of Massachusetts Medical School and School of Law from these provisions. To qualify, eligible students must provide proof of their social security or taxpayer identification number, documentation of selective service registration if applicable, and an affidavit stating their intent to apply for citizenship or legal permanent residence within 120 days. The legislation clarifies that these students cannot be denied in-state benefits based on their eligibility under this new rule.
Sen. Lydia Edwards
Sponsored bills
Maddy summaryThis bill modifies Massachusetts labor laws to allow public employees to strike after a mandatory six-month negotiation period. It extends the time required for mediation in labor disputes to no more than six months and removes certain restrictions that previously applied once negotiations reached an impasse. The law specifically prohibits strikes, work stoppages, or service slowdowns by public safety workers and other public employees until this six-month window has passed. These changes directly affect public sector workers and their unions by altering the timeline and conditions under which they can legally stop working.
Maddy summaryThis bill allows individuals in Massachusetts to petition the court to seal their eviction records if the eviction was not caused by nonpayment of rent or a breach of the lease agreement. The law defines specific terms such as "no-fault eviction" to clarify which cases are eligible for sealing and requires that all appeals be exhausted before a petition can be filed. By removing these records from public view, the legislation aims to help tenants with clean rental histories improve their chances of securing future housing. The changes apply to anyone with a relevant court record in the state's trial court system.
By Representative Kassner of Hamilton, a petition (subject to Joint Rule 12) of Kristin E. Kassner, Lydia Edwards and Liz Miranda relative to education and training for members of local planning boards and zoning boards of appeals. Municipalities and Regional Government.
Maddy summaryThis bill amends Massachusetts family law to replace the term "visitation" with "parenting time" and establishes a default rule that parents share decision-making responsibility for their children until a court or agreement states otherwise. It requires judges to include a written parenting plan in all divorce and custody orders, which must outline how parents will share major decisions and living arrangements based on the child's best interests. The legislation defines specific categories for decision-making and residential responsibility, clarifying that shared living time is only designated as such if a child spends at least one-third of their time with each parent without creating a legal presumption for equal time. Courts are instructed to consider factors such as the child's relationship with each parent, the child's reasonable wishes if old enough, and each parent's ability to communicate and cooperate when determining these responsibilities.
Maddy summaryThis bill streamlines the process for sealing criminal and juvenile court records in Massachusetts by mandating that agencies complete sealing within 90 days of eligibility. It also allows individuals with sealed records to access their own files without needing a court order or having to unseal them first. Additionally, the legislation requires the commissioner of probation to clear eligible records from their files within six months of the law taking effect. These changes directly affect residents seeking to remove past legal records from public view and improve their access to those documents.
Maddy summaryThis Massachusetts bill aims to protect the presumption of innocence and reduce negative long-term impacts for individuals charged with crimes but not convicted. It requires courts and agencies to immediately seal records for offenses that did not result in a conviction or a guilty plea, removing the need for individuals to file separate requests to do so. The law also mandates that anyone receiving criminal records must be informed that a presumption of innocence applies to pending or non-convicted cases, and it grants individuals direct access to their own sealed records without needing a court order. Additionally, the bill clarifies that juvenile records for offenses not transferred to adult court will be sealed immediately if no adjudication occurs, unless the juvenile objects.
Maddy summaryThis bill prohibits advertisers from using youth-targeted marketing to promote skin-lightening and hair-relaxing products that contain specific toxic chemicals. It directly affects companies selling these beauty products and the young people who are the intended audience for such advertisements. The law defines "youth-targeted advertisement" as any promotion based on collected data about a person's personal or product use history. By banning these specific marketing practices, the legislation aims to reduce exposure to harmful substances among Black girls who are frequently targeted by these campaigns.
Maddy summaryThis bill amends Massachusetts law to strengthen protections against discrimination by government entities by establishing a new section that defines key terms and clarifies how discrimination is evaluated. It explicitly includes "disparate impact" as a form of discrimination, allowing individuals to sue if a government policy disproportionately harms them based on protected characteristics like race or age, even if the policy was not intended to be discriminatory. The legislation requires government agencies to prove that any such policies are necessary, narrowly tailored, and supported by concrete evidence rather than speculation to avoid being found discriminatory. Additionally, it broadens the definition of who can file a claim to include civil rights testing organizations and expands the definition of a "prevailing party" to include those whose lawsuits force a government to change its policies.