Maddy summaryThis bill mandates that health insurance plans in Massachusetts cover the diagnosis and treatment of Alfi's syndrome, a rare genetic condition also known as 9p deletion syndrome. The legislation requires insurers to provide coverage for various services, including genetic testing, medications, and therapies such as speech, occupational, and physical therapy, without imposing specific limits on the number of visits a patient can make. To ensure fairness, the law stipulates that coverage limits for Alfi's syndrome must be equal to or more generous than those for other physical conditions and exempts certain providers from annual or lifetime dollar caps. Additionally, the bill includes a three-year transition period for insurance companies to implement coverage for specific habilitative or rehabilitative care that was not previously covered, provided they can demonstrate that the costs would significantly impact their premiums.
Rep. Natalie Higgins
Sponsored bills
Maddy summaryThis bill creates a new license for lactation care providers in Massachusetts to expand access to breastfeeding support. It establishes a new board of allied health professions that includes representatives from various health fields, including the new lactation care providers. To become licensed, individuals must prove good moral character and hold current certification from an accredited program, without needing to pass a separate state exam. The law also adds specific definitions for terms like "lactation care and services" and "breastfeeding equipment" to the state's health codes. These changes allow more people to legally offer professional lactation assistance, while ensuring they meet established national standards for training.
Maddy summaryThis bill mandates that insurance plans in Massachusetts cover services provided by certified nurse-midwives at the same reimbursement rate as those provided by licensed physicians. It applies to state employee health plans, public health insurance programs, and private individual or group hospital service plans operating within the state. The legislation ensures that insurers cannot lower payments for nurse-midwife services to comply with the new coverage requirements, effectively treating these services as equal to physician services for billing purposes.
Maddy summaryThis bill amends Massachusetts state laws to streamline access to gender-affirming health care by limiting the documentation required from patients. Specifically, it prohibits the state commission, insurance companies, and health care corporations from rejecting a single letter from a qualified mental health professional that confirms the medical necessity of such care. The legislation defines a qualified professional as one who meets the standards set by the World Professional Association for Transgender Health. By removing barriers related to multiple letters of approval, the bill aims to facilitate easier access to these services for transgender and non-binary individuals.
Maddy summaryThis bill amends Massachusetts laws to expand Medicaid coverage for voluntary female sterilization and establish new consent protections. It requires health insurers to cover these procedures even if a patient has not completed the federally mandated 30-day waiting period, provided they have undergone specific decision counseling and signed an informed written consent form. Additionally, the legislation prohibits any sterilization procedure on individuals aged 18 or older if the physician believes the patient is unable to provide informed consent, including those in state institutions or under guardianship. These changes directly affect Medicaid beneficiaries and healthcare providers by altering coverage rules and adding safeguards to ensure patients fully understand the permanent nature of the procedure.
Maddy summaryThis bill allows candidates running for public office in Massachusetts to use campaign funds to pay for child care services during campaign activities. It defines child care to include babysitting from various providers and permits payments to family members only if they operate a professional daycare or charge market rates. The legislation also requires the director of campaign finance to create specific regulations governing these expenses by December 31, 2023.
By Representative Khan of Newton, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 2215) of Kay Khan and others relative to protecting children from harmful diet pills and muscle-building supplements. Public Health.
Maddy summaryThis bill amends Massachusetts laws to ensure all children receive equal legal protections regardless of their parents' marital status, gender, or how the child was conceived. It replaces gender-specific terms like "man and woman" with "people" and updates references from "paternity" to "parentage" to include diverse family structures. The legislation also broadens the definition of a parent to include any person who gave birth, rather than just the biological mother, ensuring inclusive language across state statutes. These changes aim to modernize legal terminology and affirm that every child has the same rights under the law.
Maddy summaryThis bill amends Massachusetts law to remove the term "children born out of wedlock" and replace it with "nonmarital children and parentage of children," aiming to ensure all children receive equal legal rights regardless of their parents' marital status. It establishes a public policy that every child must have the same protections under the law, irrespective of the parents' gender, gender identity, or sexual orientation. By updating the title of Chapter 209C and adding a new section, the legislation seeks to eliminate legal distinctions based on how a child was conceived or the family structure of their parents.
Maddy summaryThis bill proposes to ban the addition of fluoride to all public water supplies in Massachusetts. It would require any existing municipal fluoridation programs to stop within ten days of the law taking effect. The legislation cites concerns about potential health risks to vulnerable groups, ethical issues regarding forced medication, and environmental contamination as reasons for the ban. While the ban applies to public water systems, residents would still be allowed to purchase fluoridated water for personal use if they choose.