Rep. Patrick Kearney

Maddy summaryHD 212 requires sex offenders seeking reclassification to prove reduced risk of re-offense with "clear and convincing evidence," shifting the burden from the Sex Offender Registry Board. The bill mandates the Board to consider prior classification data when reviewing such requests. This directly affects individuals petitioning for lower risk classifications under Massachusetts' registry system. The policy change alters the legal standard for reclassification decisions, making it more stringent for applicants.

Maddy summaryThis bill (HD 1559) protects police officers and individuals experiencing severe allergic reactions (anaphylaxis) from drug possession charges when seeking emergency medical help. It allows officers to carry, possess, and administer epinephrine autoinjectors without fear of prosecution or civil liability for good-faith actions. The law specifically shields against charges under drug laws if evidence of possession came from the emergency, but does not cover drug trafficking or distribution. It applies only to immediate life-threatening allergic reactions requiring urgent care.

Maddy summaryThis bill creates a new legal framework to address abusive lawsuits between family or household members where one party has been found to have committed abuse. It defines "controlling and abusive litigation" as legal actions primarily intended to harass, intimidate, or maintain contact with a victim, often involving repetitive claims or lacking legal merit. Victims can request court orders restricting such litigation, which would require courts to verify abuse history and litigation patterns before imposing penalties. If found abusive, the case is dismissed with prejudice, and the perpetrator must pay all costs, attorney fees, and faces a 48-72 month ban on filing new lawsuits.

Maddy summaryHD 2894 creates a new legal process for victims of economic abuse - defined as debts incurred due to identity theft, fraud, or coercion by family/household members (per G.L. c. 209A) or caretakers of elders/disabled individuals (per G.L. c. 265, §13K) - to challenge debts. Victims can submit a "Statement of Debt incurred through Economic Abuse" with supporting documentation (e.g., police reports, court orders, or verified statements from qualified third parties like healthcare providers or law enforcement). Upon receipt, creditors must immediately stop collection efforts, remove negative credit reports, return any payments made, and notify victims in writing within 10 business days. This law directly affects victims of abuse and their creditors, requiring clear, bilingual (English/Spanish) communication and streamlined resolution of disputed debts.

Maddy summaryThis bill (HD 810) amends Massachusetts law to broaden animal cruelty citations from specifically applying to "dogs" to covering all "animals." It replaces every instance of "dog" or "a dog" with "animal" in existing citation provisions (Section 174E, subparts f, g, and i). The bill also requires the Commissioner of Agricultural Resources to create regulations implementing these changes, in consultation with animal welfare organizations like MSPCA and the Animal Rescue League. This change directly affects animal control officers issuing citations and owners of all animals subject to cruelty charges.

Maddy summaryHD 332 requires Massachusetts to create public and medical education programs about menopause symptoms, related health conditions, and treatment options for both patients and healthcare providers. It mandates the medical board to assess and improve physician training on women’s midlife health through continuing education, and directs the labor department to study workplace impacts of menopause and publish best practices for employers on supporting employees. The bill aims to address gaps in awareness, clinical guidance, and workplace accommodations for women experiencing menopause, which affects their health, work performance, and quality of life. This legislation directly impacts women in Massachusetts during midlife, healthcare providers, and employers across the state.

Maddy summaryThis bill creates a mandatory 5-year ban on owning or accessing animals for first-time animal cruelty offenders (convicted under specific sections of Chapter 272 or 266), and a 15-year ban for repeat offenders, or as the court determines. It also applies to individuals charged with animal-related offenses who are placed on probation without a finding. The ban prohibits owning, fostering, working with animals in shelters/veterinary clinics, or volunteering at animal facilities. Violating the ban results in forfeiting animal custody and potential fines, with offenders allowed to petition the court annually to reduce the ban if they demonstrate safety and completion of required classes.

Maddy summaryThis bill (HD 797) requires courts in divorce or separation cases to consider the best interests of pets when deciding custody, directly affecting couples with companion animals going through legal separation. It mandates courts to evaluate factors like the animal’s health and safety, each party’s care history (including feeding, vet visits, and time spent), emotional bonds, and any history of abuse toward animals or people. The law also prohibits transferring or disposing of pets without court approval and allows temporary custody orders without prejudicing final decisions. It establishes clear guidelines for shared custody arrangements and enforcement, treating pets as living beings rather than property.

Maddy summaryThis bill prohibits medical professionals from performing or inducing an abortion specifically because of a Down syndrome diagnosis in the unborn child. It applies to physicians, nurses, and other licensed healthcare providers who know the abortion is sought due to a Down syndrome test result or diagnosis. Violations carry criminal penalties (up to 15 years imprisonment), license revocation, and civil liability for damages. The bill explicitly states the pregnant woman seeking such an abortion is not liable for the violation.

Maddy summaryThis bill amends Massachusetts law to clarify court procedures for civil commitments related to alcohol or substance abuse disorders. It updates references to "Appeals Court" instead of "appellate division" and adds that initial reviews of such commitments (under Chapter 123, Section 35) must follow the same process as Superior Court reviews for pre-trial detentions (Chapter 276, Section 58A). The bill also expands jurisdiction for civil commitment orders to include Boston Municipal Court civil sessions, alongside District Court. These changes streamline how courts handle initial reviews of commitments, directly affecting individuals subject to court-ordered treatment for substance abuse.