By Ms. Lovely, a petition (accompanied by bill, Senate, No. 1168) of Joan B. Lovely, Peter J. Durant, Todd M. Smola, David T. Vieira and other members of the General Court for legislation to set rates for transcripts of notes and fees taken at a trial or hearing by a transcriber. The Judiciary.
Rep. Dave Vieira
Sponsored bills
Maddy summaryThis bill sets specific fees for court transcripts in Massachusetts. It establishes rates of $4.50 per page for original transcripts (reduced to $0.15 per page for low-income individuals) and $1.50 per page for copies, with higher "rush" fees of $6.75 and $2.25. The bill also requires annual fee adjustments starting in 2030 based on the Consumer Price Index. These fees apply when parties request transcripts, while court-ordered transcripts (e.g., by a judge or district attorney in criminal cases) are paid by the court. The law directly affects individuals, attorneys, and courts involved in legal proceedings requiring transcript copies.
Maddy summaryHD 2320 restructures staffing positions within Massachusetts probate courts across 14 counties. The bill establishes specific numbers of "first assistant registers" (one per county) and "assistant registers" (varying by county, e.g., 4 in Middlesex), while eliminating the title "administrative deputy assistant register" (though current holders may continue). It also adds "assistant judicial case managers" for certain counties and adjusts Suffolk County's clerk and deputy register roles, including compensation details for some positions. This procedural bill directly affects probate court staff management, not public policy or services.
Maddy summaryThis bill strengthens protections for library materials and student expression in Massachusetts schools. It requires school libraries to select materials based on educational value and age-appropriateness (not personal views), and mandates that challenged materials remain available until a school committee reviews them after a public hearing. School committees must follow specific procedures to remove materials, requiring "clear and convincing evidence" they lack educational value. The bill directly affects school librarians, school committees, and students by safeguarding library access and providing legal protections for librarians who follow approved selection policies.
Maddy summaryThis bill reorganizes state government by elevating the National Guard to a cabinet-level position. It creates an "Executive Office of the Military Division" under the Adjutant General, who gains secretary-level authority. The bill transfers all employees, property, and responsibilities from the Executive Office of Public Safety and Security to this new office (or vice versa), ensuring no loss of seniority, benefits, or union representation during the transition. It directly affects state government agencies and employees handling military and public safety functions. The change modifies specific sections of the General Laws to reflect this structural shift.
By Mr. Moore, a petition (accompanied by bill, Senate, No. 165) of Michael O. Moore, Hannah Kane, David Paul Linsky, Colleen M. Garry and others for legislation to protect individuals with disabilities in MassHealth day habilitation programs. Children, Families and Persons with Disabilities.
Maddy summaryHD 3622 reorganizes Massachusetts' technical rescue services by creating a "division of special operations" under the State Fire Marshal, which will oversee both hazardous materials and technical rescue teams. It establishes technical rescue regions, requires a statewide response plan, and creates a coordinating council (with fire department representatives) to advise on standards, cost recovery, and procedures. The bill mandates state reimbursement for municipal technical rescue costs and provides annual stipends of up to $5,000 per qualified team member, with qualifications determined by the State Fire Marshal. These changes directly affect local fire departments, technical rescue teams, and the State Fire Marshal's office.
Maddy summaryThis Massachusetts bill prohibits discrimination against participants in the federal 340B drug discount program. It requires insurers, drug companies, and distributors to provide equal reimbursement and treatment to 340B-covered entities (like safety-net hospitals) and their contract pharmacies, banning lower payments, special restrictions, or interference with patient choices to access 340B drugs. The law explicitly forbids denying 340B drug access, disrupting contracts between pharmacies and 340B entities, or demanding extra data as a condition for supplying 340B drugs. Violations are treated as unfair trade practices under Massachusetts law. The bill directly affects healthcare providers and pharmacies participating in the 340B program within Massachusetts.
By Representatives Finn of West Springfield and Garballey of Arlington, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 232) of Michael J. Finn, Norman J. Orrall and others relative to individuals with intellectual or developmental disabilities. Children, Families and Persons with Disabilities.
Maddy summaryThis bill (H 4487) updates terminology across Massachusetts state law to replace outdated terms like "handicapped," "disabled," and "mentally retarded" with more respectful and current language such as "persons with disabilities" and "intellectual or developmental disability." It amends 33 sections of the General Laws, including provisions related to employment weeks, veteran benefits, healthcare, and community services, to consistently use inclusive terminology. The bill directly affects how state laws reference these communities but does not create new programs or change existing policies. It was reported favorably by the Children, Families and Persons with Disabilities committee.