Maddy summaryThis bill (HD 3765) removes mandatory minimum prison sentences for many non-violent drug offenses in Massachusetts. It amends Chapter 94C to replace strict minimum penalties with sentencing ranges, giving judges discretion to consider individual circumstances. Specifically, it revises Sections 32 and 32E to set maximum sentences (e.g., 15 years in state prison) instead of mandatory minimums for offenses like drug trafficking above certain weight thresholds. The law directly affects people convicted of non-violent drug cases, aiming to reduce mass incarceration and address disparities in sentencing.
Rep. Sam Montaño
Sponsored bills
Maddy summaryHD 3767 (An Act relative to summary process) creates a two-tier process for handling summary court cases in Massachusetts. The first tier requires parties to meet to discuss the case, explore mediation or resolution options, and plan for trial - without penalties for non-attendance. The second tier applies to unresolved cases, where the Clerk’s Office must send written notice of the trial date. This bill directly affects individuals and entities involved in summary process cases (typically small claims or civil matters), changing court procedure to prioritize early resolution efforts before trial.
Maddy summaryThis bill (HD 4097) requires Massachusetts property registry districts to automatically remove racially discriminatory housing restrictions from property titles when identified during title processing. Specifically, if a restriction is void under existing law (Section 23B of Chapter 184), the registry must issue a new certificate without the prohibited language and add an educational memorandum explaining the removal. It directly affects property owners and registry districts by changing how title records are updated. The bill mandates annual reporting of these changes to the Office of Fair Housing and provides a court process for resolving complex cases.
Maddy summaryHD 4021 protects tenants in Massachusetts from landlord retaliation related to immigration status. It prohibits landlords from threatening to report a tenant's immigration status (unless required by law) or suing to evict based solely on that status. Landlords can still follow legal requirements like court orders, verify financial qualifications, or address lease violations. Tenants who face prohibited actions can seek actual damages, up to $2,000 per violation, attorney fees, or other court-ordered relief. The bill explicitly states immigration status cannot be used in housing rights cases unless directly relevant to the claim.
Maddy summaryThis bill modifies Massachusetts sentencing laws to increase parole eligibility for certain life-sentence prisoners. It requires that individuals serving multiple life sentences for separate crimes become eligible for parole after 25 years, removes automatic parole exclusions for some life-sentence prisoners, and sets minimum terms for first-degree murder convictions (25 years for adults, 15-20 years for those aged 14-18). The bill also establishes a voluntary Restorative Justice program in prisons for those serving over 25 years, allowing structured dialogue between offenders, victims, and communities to address harm. These changes directly affect prisoners serving life sentences under specific circumstances, particularly those convicted of murder or multiple offenses.
Maddy summaryHD 894 prohibits research institutions and product testing facilities from separating infant nonhuman primates (such as monkeys) from their biological mothers for research or testing purposes, except when medically necessary for the health of either animal. If separation occurs for medical reasons, facilities must minimize distress without sedatives or restraint and reunite mother and infant as soon as possible. The law applies to facilities testing products like cosmetics, drugs, or medical devices and covers the first 12 months of an infant’s life. The Massachusetts Department of Public Health must create implementing regulations within 90 days of the bill’s passage.
Maddy summaryHD 3355 establishes a task force to review Massachusetts' laws on domestic violence and sexual assault reporting confidentiality. The task force, including survivors and advocates, will assess current laws (like Section 97D) and recommend changes to protect survivors' privacy without shielding abusers. It must submit findings and recommendations to the legislature within 18 months of the bill's effective date. This procedural bill does not change existing laws but sets up a formal review process.
Maddy summaryHD 1828 requires employers to provide new written wage notices within 10 days of hire, detailing pay rates, pay schedules, and business contact information in the employee's preferred language. It creates joint liability for wage theft among lead contractors, labor contractors, and subcontractors, holding their officers personally accountable. The Attorney General gains new enforcement powers to sue for treble damages, lost wages, and attorney fees on behalf of affected workers. The bill also adjusts unemployment benefits to account for unpaid wages during the benefit calculation period.
Maddy summaryThis bill repeals Sections 34 and 35 of Chapter 272 of the General Laws. It directly affects individuals previously subject to these specific legal provisions, which the bill's title identifies as discriminatory. The key mechanism is the removal of these two sections from the state's legal code. This is a procedural change that eliminates existing statutes without creating new policies or requirements.
Maddy summaryHD 1879 updates Massachusetts law to clarify and strengthen protections against secret photography of intimate body parts. The bill defines key terms like "electronically surveils" (using devices to secretly capture images) and specifies "sexual or other intimate parts" as genitals, buttocks, pubic area, or female nipples. It increases penalties: up to 2.5 years in jail or $5,000 fine for adults, and up to 5 years in prison or $10,000 fine for minors or incompetent individuals. The law applies directly to anyone who secretly photographs another person's intimate areas without consent, with consent being a valid defense only if the victim was competent.