By Representative Jones of North Reading and Senator Tarr, a joint petition (subject to Joint Rule 12) of Bradley H. Jones, Jr., Bruce E. Tarr and others relative to energy costs, transparency, and sustainability. Telecommunications, Utilities and Energy.
By Representative Murphy of Weymouth, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 3537) of James M. Murphy relative to ensuring ratepayer and community representation in utility company regulatory proceedings. Telecommunications, Utilities and Energy.
By Representative Blais of Deerfield, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 3452) of Natalie M. Blais and others relative to protecting consumers from unreasonable utility rate increases. Telecommunications, Utilities and Energy.
By Representative Moran of Lawrence, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 3534) of Frank A. Moran and others relative to electric ratepayer protections. Telecommunications, Utilities and Energy.
This bill limits electric and gas utility companies' allowed return on equity (a measure of profit) to the average approved in neighboring states (Connecticut, Rhode Island, Maine, Vermont, New Hampshire) over the past four years. It directly affects Massachusetts utility companies seeking rate increases through state regulatory proceedings. The bill prohibits approving a higher return than this regional average, with limited exceptions only if a company's constitutional rights would otherwise be violated. It specifically excludes compensation from certain efficiency programs and performance incentives when calculating the allowed return.
By Mr. Mark, a petition (accompanied by bill, Senate, No. 2297) of Paul W. Mark and Steven George Xiarhos for legislation relative to fair and stable utility pricing. Telecommunications, Utilities and Energy.
By Ms. Comerford, a petition (accompanied by bill, Senate, No. 2238) of Joanne M. Comerford, Steven George Xiarhos, John C. Velis and Adam Gomez for legislation to protect consumers from unreasonable utility rate increases. Telecommunications, Utilities and Energy.
By Mrs. Dooner, a petition (accompanied by bill) (subject to Joint Rule 12) of Kelly A. Dooner, Michael O. Moore, Mark C. Montigny, Patrick Joseph Kearney and other members of the General Court for legislation to promote affordable utility services in the Commonwealth. Telecommunications, Utilities and Energy.
SD 1092 prevents utility companies from passing costs for new interstate gas pipeline construction or expansion to ratepayers (customers who pay utility bills). It amends state law to require the department to reject any contract for gas, pipeline capacity, or storage where those costs would be recovered through customer rate increases. The bill directly affects utility companies seeking to build or expand interstate gas infrastructure and their ratepayers. This provision blocks such projects from being funded via future rate hikes without specific legislative approval. The law applies to contracts requiring new pipeline construction or expansion, not existing infrastructure.
SD 2004 exempts solar energy projects on federal military lands in Massachusetts from renewable energy production caps and net metering limits. It allows electric distribution companies to build, own, and operate solar facilities on these lands without using customer ratepayer funds or needing department approval. This directly affects military installations and utility companies by removing barriers to solar development on federal military property within the state.