Education

This bill (HD 1273) creates a tuition-free education program for current public school teachers and paraprofessionals working in Massachusetts. It requires the Board of Higher Education and the Board of Education to establish a program allowing these educators to take courses at Massachusetts public colleges and universities without paying tuition. The key mechanism is a mandatory state-level program, not individual applications, directly affecting eligible educators employed in the Commonwealth's public schools. The policy change eliminates tuition costs for participating educators seeking further education at public institutions.

By Mr. Cyr, a petition (accompanied by bill, Senate, No. 335) of Julian Cyr, Andrea Joy Campbell, Attorney General , Nick Collins and Barry R. Finegold for legislation to promote safe technology use and distraction-free education for youth. Education.

By Representatives Doherty of Taunton and Hamilton of Methuen, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 554) of Carol A. Doherty and James K. Hawkins for legislation to establish school counseling programs. Education.

This bill establishes a clean energy education program within Massachusetts' vocational and technical high schools. It requires electric and gas utilities, along with municipal aggregators, to annually transfer at least $20 million from energy efficiency funds to the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. The funds support workforce training programs in clean energy, renewable energy technology, energy storage, electric vehicles, and manufacturing. This directly affects vocational schools offering these specific training pathways and aims to build local clean energy job skills. The funding must not reduce existing low-income energy assistance programs.

Senate, July 10, 2025 -- The committee on Education, to whom was referred the petitions (accompanied by bill, Senate, No. 323) of Brendan P. Crighton and Mark C. Montigny for legislation to prohibit the use to personal electronic devices in schools; (accompanied by bill, Senate, No. 333) of John J. Cronin and Mark C. Montigny for legislation to prohibiting the use of wireless communication devices in K-12 public schools by students; (accompanied by bill, Senate, No. 335) of Julian Cyr, Andrea Joy Campbell, Attorney General , Nick Collins and Barry R. Finegold for legislation to promote safe technology use and distraction-free education for youth; (accompanied by bill, Senate, No. 381) of John F. Keenan, Mark C. Montigny and Donald R. Berthiaume, Jr. for legislation to limit cell phones in classrooms; (accompanied by bill, Senate, No. 424) of Patrick M. O'Connor and Mark C. Montigny for legislation to regulate the use of mobile communication devices in educational institutions; (accompanied by bill, Senate, No. 461) of John C. Velis, Carmine Lawrence Gentile, James C. Arena-DeRosa, Paul R. Feeney and other members of the General Court for legislation to prohibit access to personal electronic devices and social media in public schools; and (accompanied by bill, Senate, No. 463) of Kirstin Beatty, for legislation to regulate screen time and technology privacy in early and K-12 education, report the accompanying bill (Senate, No. 2549).

By Representative Tyler of Boston, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 727) of Chynah Tyler relative to student access and return on investment of college and career pathways programs. Education.

This bill requires all public Massachusetts colleges to accept Advanced Placement (AP) exam scores of 3, 4, or 5 for college credit toward degree requirements. It mandates that institutions develop written policies explaining how these credits apply (e.g., general education, major, or elective) and post them online. Colleges may only require scores above 3 (e.g., 4 or 5) if the chief academic officer provides evidence that higher scores are necessary for success in advanced courses, with the Department of Higher Education providing guidance on acceptable evidence. The bill also requires annual reporting on these policies to the legislature and public posting of all credit-acceptance rules.

This bill requires the state to fully reimburse school districts for special education transportation costs that exceed regular program costs. It directly affects cities, towns, regional school districts, and vocational schools serving students with special education needs. Reimbursement covers the regular program's average per-pupil cost plus excess costs (capped at 110% of the statewide average), calculated using specific department-defined methods. Funding increases gradually, reaching 100% reimbursement by fiscal year 2029. The bill ensures districts aren't burdened by costs not covered under existing programs.

This bill (HD 1982, the RAISE Act) requires Massachusetts school districts to establish annual targets and 3-year plans to reduce racial and other disparities in student suspensions, expulsions, and academic achievement gaps. Districts must develop evidence-based strategies - such as restorative justice programs, extended learning time, staff training, and culturally responsive curricula - with input from parents and community stakeholders. They must publicly report annually on progress using defined metrics like suspension rates, days of lost instruction, and student assessment data. The law directly affects all public school districts and students in marginalized subgroups, aiming to hold districts accountable for systemic inequities in discipline and outcomes.

This bill (HD 2074) prohibits Massachusetts public school districts and charter schools from suspending students solely for violating dress or grooming rules. It requires all such rules to be non-discriminatory (based on gender identity, race, religion, disability, etc.), clear and objective, and bans physical enforcement or requiring students to undress in front of others. The law also explicitly states that schools may still require specific clothing colors and address bullying or harassment. The changes take effect 60 days after passage.