Issue · Technology

Technology

Every technology bill, vote, and legislator stance in Maryland, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
35
2026 Regular Session
Top supporter
Ben Brooks
100% support rate
Top opponent
Jack Bailey
0% support rate
Ranked legislators
10
5 support · 5 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving technology in Maryland

Legislators moving technology in Maryland
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Decisive votes
Ben Brooks
Ben Brooks Senate · District 10
D
Strong +
100% 6
Bill Ferguson
Bill Ferguson Senate · District 46
D
Strong +
100% 6
Brian Feldman
Brian Feldman Senate · District 15
D
Strong +
100% 6
Charles Sydnor
Charles Sydnor Senate · District 44
D
Strong +
100% 6
Cheryl Kagan
Cheryl Kagan Senate · District 17
D
Strong +
100% 6
Jack Bailey
Jack Bailey Senate · District 29
R
Strong −
0% 6
Paul Corderman
Paul Corderman Senate · District 2
R
Strong −
0% 6
Johnny Mautz
Johnny Mautz Senate · District 37
R
Strong −
0% 5
Justin Ready
Justin Ready Senate · District 5
R
Strong −
0% 5
Steve Hershey
Steve Hershey Senate · District 36
R
Strong −
0% 5
Showing 31–35 of 35 bills

All technology bills

passed · Maryland · Senate Mar 26, 2026

SB 661: Wiretapping and Electronic Surveillance - Intercepted Communications - Admissibility of Evidence

SB 661 modifies Maryland law to clarify when intercepted communications (like phone calls or texts) can be used as evidence in criminal court. It allows such evidence if: (1) at least one party was outside Maryland during the communication, (2) the interception wasn’t done by Maryland law enforcement, and (3) all parties were co-conspirators in a violent crime. For other cases, it sets strict conditions for admissibility, including requiring prosecutors to notify defendants 14 days in advance and proving the evidence is more relevant than alternatives. The bill directly affects criminal defendants, prosecutors, and law enforcement handling wiretap evidence in Maryland courts. It takes effect October 1, 2026.
passed · Maryland · Senate Mar 26, 2026

SB 632: State Government - State Elected Officials - Protection of Personal Information

SB 632 creates a new Office of State Elected Officials Information Privacy within Maryland’s Department of Legislative Services. It allows state elected officials (the "protected individuals") to request that their personal details - such as addresses, phone numbers, and email - be removed from public online sources like government websites, social media, or social networks. The bill also establishes criminal penalties for intentionally posting an official’s personal information online under certain circumstances. This replaces the existing Address Confidentiality Program for domestic violence survivors with a dedicated system specifically for protecting state elected officials’ privacy.
passed · Maryland · Senate Mar 26, 2026

SB 310: Criminal Records - Maryland Judiciary Case Search - Traffic Violation by a Minor

SB 310 prohibits the Maryland Judiciary Case Search system from referencing records of traffic violations committed by minors (under 18) under the Maryland Vehicle Law or other traffic laws. It directly affects minors who receive traffic citations, ensuring these records are not displayed in public online searches. The bill amends Maryland's Criminal Procedure law to require the case search system to omit all references to such minor traffic violations. This change takes effect October 1, 2026, and does not alter the existence of the underlying records.
passed · Maryland · Senate Mar 24, 2026

SB 932: Consumer Protection - Social Media Platforms - Display of User Location

SB 932 requires social media platforms operating in Maryland to display the city and country (derived from IP address) of each adult user whose account is visible to a Maryland user. It applies to platforms like Facebook or Instagram, directly affecting both the platforms (which must implement this display) and Maryland users (who gain visibility into the general location of other users they interact with). The law explicitly excludes minors' locations from display and defines "general geographical location" to exclude precise GPS data. This is a consumer protection measure focused on transparency, not data collection or sharing.
passed · Maryland · Senate Mar 24, 2026

SB 528: Consumer Protection - Video Streaming Services - Loudness of Commercial Advertisements

SB 528 prohibits video streaming services (like Netflix or Disney+) from transmitting commercial advertisements louder than the accompanying video content to Maryland consumers. It directly affects internet-based streaming platforms, excluding traditional TV broadcasters and cable operators. The law requires services to comply with federal loudness standards set by the FCC under the Federal Commercial Advertisement Loudness Mitigation Act. Violations would be treated as unfair trade practices under Maryland's consumer protection law, with enforcement through existing penalty provisions.
Showing 31 to 35 of 35 bills
Previous 1 … 2 3 4