This bill requires Iowa's state treasurer to allocate 20% of general fund public money into investments in gold, silver, platinum, and palladium, and 10% into equity investments in companies producing those precious metals, oil, or natural gas. It directly affects how the state manages its general fund assets, mandating specific percentages for these investments. The key mechanism is the mandatory reallocation of state funds toward these commodity-related assets, replacing current investment practices. This policy change shifts state investment strategy toward tangible commodities and resource-sector businesses. The bill is currently in committee after its February 11, 2026 introduction.
HF 2342 sets specific future dates for repealing various Iowa tax credit programs. The bill specifies that existing tax credits (like those for renewable chemicals, sustainable aviation fuel, and job creation) will end between 2028 and 2041, with most repeals occurring by 2032. It directly affects taxpayers and businesses currently claiming or planning to claim these credits, as they will no longer be available after the designated dates. The bill includes a key exception preserving credits issued or earned before January 1, 2032, ensuring existing agreements and carryforwards remain valid.
This Iowa bill (HSB 692) establishes specific siting rules for renewable energy facilities like wind turbines, solar arrays, and battery storage systems. It prohibits local governments from using eminent domain to acquire land for these projects and sets strict minimum distances: wind facilities must be at least three times their height from homes or community buildings, while solar and battery systems have fixed distance requirements (e.g., 50 feet from utility lines, 100 feet from homes). The bill limits local authorities to only certain standards, such as noise limits (max 47 decibels) and shadow flicker restrictions (max 30 hours/year), while requiring developers to repair infrastructure damage. It directly affects renewable energy developers, local zoning boards, and residents near proposed facilities.
SF 2069 imposes a tax on pipeline companies transporting liquefied carbon dioxide (CO2) through or within Iowa. It charges $2.50 per metric ton for general transport and $1.00 per metric ton when CO2 is used for enhanced oil recovery (an oil extraction technique). Pipeline companies must file annual returns by March 31 detailing transported volumes and EOR usage, with revenues deposited into the taxpayer relief fund. The bill includes penalties for late filings or inaccurate returns, administered by the Iowa Department of Revenue.
This bill prohibits using eminent domain to acquire land for, construct, or operate pipelines primarily transporting carbon oxide. It directly affects pipeline companies seeking to build such infrastructure through forced land acquisition. The law amends Iowa law to explicitly block eminent domain for these pipelines and applies to all new condemnation proceedings filed after enactment. The bill takes immediate effect upon passage.
This bill changes how excess energy credits are handled for customers with rooftop solar or other small-scale renewable energy systems (distributed generation). Under the new rule, unused credits must stay in a customer's account to offset future electricity bills until the customer specifically requests a cash-out or discontinues service. Previously, credits were automatically cashed out annually at the utility's avoided cost rate, splitting the funds between the customer and a low-income energy program. Customers now choose a January or April cash-out date when connecting their system, but credits remain available for future use without automatic payout.
SF 95 amends Iowa's eminent domain laws to raise the evidence standard for pipeline projects. It requires agencies seeking to condemn agricultural land for hazardous liquid pipelines (under Chapter 479B) to prove "public use" by "clear and convincing evidence" instead of the lower "preponderance of evidence" standard. This directly affects pipeline companies and landowners in agricultural areas, making it harder to acquire farmland for such projects without owner consent. The bill also clarifies that agricultural land cannot be condemned for "private development" without the owner's agreement. It takes effect immediately upon enactment and applies to condemnation cases filed after that date.
HF 238 prohibits the Iowa Utilities Commission from renewing permits for pipelines transporting liquefied carbon dioxide (CO2). It sets a strict 25-year maximum operational limit for all CO2 pipelines, meaning they cannot operate beyond this period even if initially permitted for less time. This bill specifically targets CO2 pipelines, reinforcing a 25-year cap that already applies to other pipelines under current law but explicitly prevents renewal for CO2-specific projects. The bill directly affects CO2 pipeline operators and the commission responsible for issuing and reviewing permits.
HF 491 modifies Iowa's eminent domain laws for pipeline projects. It requires pipeline companies seeking to use eminent domain to first qualify as "common carriers" (transporting goods for unaffiliated shippers who retain ownership, not selling to the pipeline company). For hazardous liquid pipelines, the government must now prove "public use" with "clear and convincing evidence" instead of the lower standard. This directly affects pipeline companies seeking infrastructure rights and landowners whose property could be taken for pipeline projects. The bill takes effect immediately upon enactment.
This bill amends Iowa law to remove specific environmental goals from agricultural energy support and prohibits the Iowa Utilities Commission from considering climate change when reviewing pipeline permits. It deletes references to reducing petroleum dependency and lowering atmospheric contamination from fossil fuels in a section supporting agricultural energy industries. The bill explicitly states the Commission "shall not consider climate change" when deciding on hazardous liquid pipeline permits, requiring only that permits promote "public convenience and necessity." This directly affects pipeline companies seeking permits and the Commission's permitting process, shifting focus away from climate impacts.