Maddy summaryS 4593, the "No More Political Prosecutions Act of 2024," amends federal law to remove a legal protection for the President, Vice President, and former Presidents/Vice Presidents. Specifically, it deletes language in Section 1442(a) of title 28, U.S. Code, that previously shielded these officials from lawsuits related to their official duties. This change means civil suits or criminal prosecutions against these top officials for actions taken in office would no longer be blocked by this specific legal provision. The bill applies to cases pending or filed after its enactment.
Sponsored bills
Maddy summaryThis bill reauthorizes federal funding for pediatric emergency medical services programs through 2029. It increases the annual grant amount from $22.3 million (for fiscal years 2020-2024) to $24.3 million per year (for fiscal years 2025-2029). The funding directly supports state and community programs that provide specialized emergency care for children. This change extends existing support at a higher level, ensuring continued access to pediatric emergency medical services nationwide.
Maddy summaryThis joint resolution (SJRES 97) seeks to block a Department of Labor rule finalized in April 2024 that redefined overtime exemptions for certain white-collar workers. The rule would have changed how employers classify executive, administrative, professional, outside sales, and computer employees for overtime pay purposes. By invoking Chapter 8 of Title 5, U.S. Code, this resolution aims to nullify the rule, preventing it from taking effect. It directly affects employers and workers covered by the rule, but the resolution itself does not change existing labor standards - it only prevents the rule from being implemented.
Maddy summaryThis resolution (SRES 732) celebrates the 247th anniversary of the U.S. flag's creation (June 14, 1777) and expresses support for the Pledge of Allegiance. It affirms the Pledge's constitutionality, referencing historical context like its 1954 addition of "under God" and the 2004 *Elk Grove Unified School District v. Newdow* Supreme Court case. The Senate states the Pledge remains a constitutional expression of patriotism, recognizing its longstanding role in American life. This is a symbolic resolution with no policy or funding changes.
Maddy summaryThis bill requires Medicare Advantage plans (private insurance plans that cover Medicare benefits) to implement electronic systems for prior authorization requests by 2027, replacing outdated methods like fax. Starting in 2026, these plans must publicly report detailed data on prior authorization decisions - including approval/denial rates, appeal outcomes, and processing times - to the government. The government will publish this data online so seniors and providers can see how plans handle requests. These changes aim to reduce delays in care for seniors by making the process more transparent and timely.
Maddy summarySenate Joint Resolution 96 seeks to block a Department of Education rule that prohibits sex-based discrimination in federally funded schools (e.g., colleges, K-12 programs receiving federal aid). If approved, it would invalidate the rule published April 29, 2024 (89 Fed. Reg. 33474), preventing it from taking effect under a congressional disapproval process. This would maintain existing nondiscrimination standards for education programs instead of implementing the new rule. The resolution directly affects all schools and programs receiving federal education funding.
Maddy summaryThe Dismantle DEI Act of 2024 would eliminate diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs across federal agencies by rescinding related executive orders, closing DEI offices, and prohibiting federal funding for DEI training and activities. The bill defines "prohibited diversity, equity, or inclusion practice" to include training that asserts certain racial or ethnic groups are inherently superior or inferior, and bans federal funds from being used for such programs. It would apply to federal offices, training, contracting, grants, advisory committees, and education programs, with enforcement through private lawsuits and penalties of $1,000 per violation per day. The bill specifically exempts Equal Employment Opportunity offices and offices enforcing the Americans with Disabilities Act from these restrictions.
Maddy summaryThis bill prohibits federal and state entities from penalizing health care organizations or providers who decline to participate in abortion services, referrals, coverage, or facilitation. It creates a private right of action, allowing affected individuals or entities to sue for violations in federal court and seek remedies like injunctions or damages. The law covers hospitals, insurers, pharmacies, clinics, and other health care entities, ensuring they can maintain conscience-based objections without losing federal funding or facing retaliation. Enforcement would be handled by the Office for Civil Rights, which must investigate complaints and refer cases to the Justice Department when needed.
Maddy summaryS 4513, the Preserving JROTC Programs Act of 2024, lowers the minimum student enrollment requirement for high school Junior Reserve Officers' Training Corps (JROTC) units. It amends federal law to reduce the threshold from 100 students to 50 students for a unit to remain eligible. This change directly affects high schools with JROTC programs that previously had fewer than 100 enrolled students. The bill aims to help smaller schools maintain their JROTC programs by easing enrollment requirements.
Maddy summaryThis joint resolution (SJRES 92) seeks to block an Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) rule that established new greenhouse gas emission standards for fossil fuel power plants and repealed an earlier rule. It targets the EPA's specific rule (published May 9, 2024), which set performance standards for new/modified plants, emission guidelines for existing plants, and removed the Affordable Clean Energy Rule. The resolution uses a procedural mechanism under the Congressional Review Act to disapprove the rule, meaning it would prevent the EPA rule from taking effect. If passed, the rule would have no legal force, directly affecting how power plants regulate emissions under federal law.