Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez

Maddy summaryHR 9104, the Access to Birth Control Act, requires pharmacies that normally stock contraception to provide birth control or related medications without delay if in stock, or immediately offer alternatives like referrals to other pharmacies or expedited orders if unavailable. It prohibits pharmacists from intimidating customers, misrepresenting availability, breaching confidentiality, or refusing to fill valid prescriptions for birth control. Pharmacies violating these rules face civil penalties up to $1,000 per day or private lawsuits. The law specifically applies to pharmacies that routinely carry contraception and excludes cases where a valid prescription is missing or payment cannot be made. It aims to address documented refusals to dispense birth control, particularly following the Dobbs decision.

Maddy summaryHR 6362, the Protecting Benefits for Disabled Veterans Act of 2023, allows the VA to assign a total disability rating to veterans with service-connected disabilities who cannot work due to those conditions. It specifies that veterans qualify if they have one disability rated at least 60% or multiple disabilities totaling 70% (with at least one at 40%), and the VA must consider certain disability combinations as a single condition. The bill prohibits the VA from considering a veteran’s age or Social Security benefits when making this determination, and clarifies that veterans maintaining marginal employment (below the poverty threshold) may still qualify for total disability. This change directly affects disabled veterans seeking full benefits by providing clearer pathways to qualify for total disability ratings based on employment impact.

Maddy summaryThe Corner Post Reversal Act amends federal law to establish a six-year deadline for filing lawsuits challenging federal agency actions. It requires that any legal challenge to an agency decision must be initiated within six years of the agency's final action, unless another law specifies a different timeframe. This change directly affects individuals, organizations, or entities seeking to contest agency decisions in court by limiting the window for legal action. The bill does not alter substantive policies but modifies procedural rules governing judicial review of agency actions.

Maddy summaryHCONRES 119 is a non-binding congressional resolution expressing that people wrongfully or unjustly deported after establishing long-term ties in the U.S. (such as DACA recipients, veterans, or those with expunged convictions) deserve a fair process to return. It proposes creating a centralized unit within the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), modeled after DHS’s existing ImmVets program for veterans, to review applications for re-entry. The resolution does not change immigration law but urges DHS to establish this dedicated process to address systemic barriers like lengthy delays, complex procedures, and limited access to legal help. It specifically targets individuals separated from families after years in the U.S., including those deported due to errors, protests, or outdated convictions. The resolution emphasizes repairing past injustices without altering current legal frameworks.

Maddy summaryHRES 1355 is a non-binding resolution supporting the designation of July 10 as Journeyman Lineworkers Recognition Day. It honors lineworkers who maintain electrical infrastructure under hazardous conditions, including during disasters, and commemorates Henry Miller, the first president of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, who died on July 10, 1896, while troubleshooting an electrical outage. The resolution encourages public recognition of these workers' contributions but does not create new laws or policies.

Maddy summaryHRES 1353 is a resolution introduced by House members to impeach Supreme Court Associate Justice Clarence Thomas. The resolution outlines three articles of impeachment alleging Thomas failed to disclose gifts and financial transactions with donor Harlan Crow over 15 years, refused to recuse from cases involving his spouse's financial interests, and participated in cases concerning the 2020 election results despite his spouse's involvement in efforts to overturn them. These allegations claim Thomas violated federal ethics laws requiring judicial disclosure and recusal to maintain impartiality. The resolution would be referred to the Senate for trial if passed by the House, but it is not a law that would directly affect anyone beyond the impeachment process.

Maddy summaryThis resolution (HRES 1354) is a formal House of Representatives impeachment action against Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito, introduced by multiple Democratic representatives on July 10, 2024. It alleges two violations: (1) Alito failed to recuse himself from three election-related cases (Trump v. United States, Fischer v. United States, and Trump v. Anderson) despite flying flags associated with the 2020 election denial movement outside his homes, which the resolution claims demonstrated bias; and (2) Alito allegedly failed to disclose luxury travel gifts from donors, violating financial disclosure laws. The resolution argues these actions breached his judicial oaths and federal recusal statutes (28 U.S.C. § 455) and financial disclosure requirements (5 U.S.C. §§ 13103-13104). As a procedural resolution, it initiates impeachment proceedings but does not change law or policy; the Senate would need to hold a trial for removal.

Maddy summaryHR 8988, the "Get Foreign Money Out of U.S. Elections Act," expands federal law to prohibit foreign-controlled businesses from influencing U.S. elections. It bans contributions or spending by any for-profit business entity where foreign nationals own 50% or more of voting shares, or where foreign entities collectively own 5% or more (or exert control over election activities). Businesses must certify compliance before making election-related spending, including contributions to political committees, and recipients cannot reuse uncertified funds for further election activities. This bill directly affects foreign-owned corporations, partnerships, and similar entities seeking to participate in U.S. elections.

Maddy summaryThe SHIELD Act (HR 8980) establishes a federal grant program to improve access to legal representation for people facing deportation. It authorizes $100 million annually for fiscal years 2025-2026 to fund workforce development and legal services infrastructure through competitive grants to states, local governments, and community organizations. The program will support recruitment, training, and retention of legal professionals to provide high-quality, culturally competent representation to immigrants in deportation proceedings. Grantees must report on services provided, outcomes achieved, and unmet needs to ensure accountability and measure the program's impact on addressing the current shortage of legal representation in immigration court.

Maddy summaryHR 8825, the Right to Vote Act, establishes a fundamental right for all citizens of legal voting age to vote in federal elections. It directly affects voters across all states and territories by prohibiting government actions that make voting harder (like restrictive ID laws or reduced polling places) unless those actions are the least restrictive way to serve a significant government interest. The bill creates two legal standards: "retrogression" (diminishing voting access) and "substantial impairment" (making voting significantly harder), allowing voters to sue in federal court to challenge such restrictions. Courts must expedite these cases, and the law applies to all federal elections occurring on or after September 1, 2024.