Issue · Housing

Housing

Every housing bill, vote, and legislator stance in Hawaii, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
3
2026 Regular Session
Top supporter
Jarrett Keohokalole
100% support rate
Top opponent
Brenton Awa
0% support rate
Ranked legislators
10
5 support · 5 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving housing in Hawaii

Legislators moving housing in Hawaii
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Votes
Jarrett Keohokalole
Jarrett Keohokalole Senate · District 24
D
Strong +
100% 14
Lisa Kitagawa
Lisa Kitagawa House · District 48
D
Strong +
96% 39
Trish La Chica
Trish La Chica House · District 37
D
Strong +
95% 34
Darius Kila
Darius Kila House · District 44
D
Strong +
95% 33
Della Belatti
Della Belatti House · District 26
D
Strong +
94% 45
Brenton Awa
Brenton Awa Senate · District 23
R
Strong −
0% 31
Samantha DeCorte
Samantha DeCorte Senate · District 22
R
Strong −
0% 19
Elle Cochran
Elle Cochran House · District 14
R
Oppose
23% 43
Elijah Pierick
Elijah Pierick House · District 39
R
Oppose
28% 42
Diamond Garcia
Diamond Garcia House · District 42
R
Oppose
33% 49
Showing 3 of 3 bills

All housing bills

passed both · Hawaii · Senate May 12, 2026

SCR 48: DECLARING THE INTENT THAT AFFORDABLE HOUSING CREDITS ARE PERPETUAL AND REMAIN VALID UNTIL REDEEMED, AND REQUESTING THE COUNTIES TO RECOGNIZE THESE CREDITS WITHOUT EXPIRATION DATES.

This Senate Concurrent Resolution clarifies that affordable housing credits issued under Hawaii's housing laws are permanent assets that remain valid until they are used to fulfill affordable housing obligations, rather than having expiration dates. The bill directly affects county governments, the Hawaii Housing Finance and Development Corporation, and developers who rely on these credits to build affordable housing units. It requests that counties align their administrative policies and memoranda of agreement with state law to ensure these credits are not restricted by time limits or other conditions not authorized by statute. The resolution aims to protect the value and transferability of these credits to encourage continued private investment in affordable housing projects.
passed both · Hawaii · Senate May 12, 2026

SCR 160: URGING THE HAWAII PUBLIC HOUSING AUTHORITY, DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES' HOMELESS PROGRAMS OFFICE, STATEWIDE OFFICE ON HOMELESSNESS AND HOUSING SOLUTIONS, AND HAWAII HOUSING FINANCE AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION TO CREATE A HOUSING LADDER PROGRAM TO HELP INDIVIDUALS AND FAMILIES GRADUATE INTO UNSUBSIDIZED HOUSING.

This Senate Concurrent Resolution urges four Hawaii state housing agencies to develop a "housing ladder" program designed to help individuals and families move from subsidized housing into non-subsidized, market-rate housing. The proposed program would include support services such as financial counseling, workforce training, transitional rental assistance, and partnerships with private housing providers to facilitate upward mobility. The bill does not create new funding or mandate specific actions but instead requests the agencies to collaborate on creating this program and report their findings to the Legislature by early 2027. This measure aims to address housing shortages by freeing up subsidized housing units for those still waiting while helping current participants achieve greater financial stability.
passed both · Hawaii · Senate May 12, 2026

SCR 184: REQUESTING THE HAWAIʻI CIVIL RIGHTS COMMISSION TO EXAMINE THE APPLICABILITY OF EXISTING STATE ANTI-DISCRIMINATION LAWS TO ALGORITHMIC AND AUTOMATED DECISION SYSTEMS.

This Senate Concurrent Resolution asks the Hawaii Civil Rights Commission to study whether current state anti-discrimination laws apply to decisions made by artificial intelligence and automated systems. The bill directs the commission to examine how these technologies are used in areas like hiring, housing, and credit, and to identify any legal gaps or challenges in addressing potential discrimination. The commission must submit a report with findings and recommendations to the Legislature by early 2027, which could lead to new rules or laws if needed. This measure does not change existing laws immediately but initiates an official review of how civil rights protections work in the age of automated decision-making.