Sen. Jack Walsh

Maddy summaryThis bill updates overtime pay rules for non-exempt employees working for the Delaware Department of Transportation. Starting July 1, 2024, these workers will receive time-and-a-half pay for any hours worked beyond 37.5 hours in a single week. The change applies specifically to the DOT and ensures that overtime compensation begins once an employee exceeds the standard 37.5-hour threshold.

This bill amends Chapter 69 of Title 18 relating to captive insurance to provide the Commissioner with additional flexibility to approve those types of financial institutions that would be authorized to hold required capital and surplus of captive insurance companies. This change would recognize the current financial environment and practices of financial institutions and captive insurers. Assets can be safely held in financial institutions other than banks and do not need to be held in Delaware in many circumstances where the type of risk does not require it, and the Commissioner will be authorized to impose additional conditions on captives related to capital and surplus to ensure the solvency and efficient operations of captives.

This bill amends Chapter 68 of Title 18, related to medical negligence insurance and litigation, to repeal those provisions of the law that are expired or that are no longer used as a matter of practice in medical negligence litigation.

Early, sustained exposure to peanut and egg proteins in the infant diet significantly reduces the risk that an infant will develop a peanut or egg allergy, saving lives and future health care costs. Following multiple clinical studies, the current guidance of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology and the American College of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology, which is followed by pediatricians, recommends that by age 6 months, all infants should be introduced to both peanut and egg protein and that unless contraindicated, all infants should regularly consume peanut and well-cooked egg protein until they reach the age of 1 year, to reduce the risk of developing peanut or egg allergies. This Act requires that all health insurance plans subject to requirements under Delaware law, including Medicaid, provide coverage, at no cost when prescribed to infants, of at least 1 early peanut allergen introduction dietary supplement and at least 1 early egg allergen introduction dietary supplement. This Act applies to all policies, contracts, or certificates issued, renewed, modified, altered, amended, or reissued after December 31, 2025.

This Act revises the experience rating methodology for assigning unemployment assessment rates to employers under the Unemployment Insurance Code in Delaware, replacing the current benefit wage ratio methodology with the benefit ratio methodology used by 19 other states. The new methodology is meant to be more responsive to changes in the economy over time, to better sustain the solvency of the Unemployment Trust Fund, and to be easier to administer. The unemployment assessment rate for an employer under this new methodology would be calculated by combining a benefit ratio assessment, an employer size add-on, and an employer industry add-on. The supplemental tax for operations and technology costs that is already included in the Unemployment Code would continue to be added to each employer's overall assessment rate. This bill also reduces new employer unemployment assessment rates and phases in a permanent taxable wage base over three years- $12,500 for calendar year 2025, $14,500 for calendar year 2026, and $16,500 for calendar year 2027 and thereafter. The new methodology would be in effect beginning calendar year 2027. Until the effective date of that new tax rate structure, this Act would also provide temporary relief to employers who pay unemployment tax assessments in calendar year 2025 and 2026 by reducing new employer tax rates, simplifying tax rate schedules, reducing or holding constant overall employer tax rates, and reducing the maximum earned rate. This Act also makes technical corrections to existing Code to conform to the Legislative Drafting Manual and reinserts a historical provision that applied only to 2023.

This Act clarifies various aspects of the State’s unclaimed property laws, specifically: Section 1 clarifies and confirms current practice regarding the definition of “foreign country” or “foreign jurisdiction.” Section 2 clarifies and confirms current practice regarding the definition of “owner.” This section is not intended to limit holder reimbursement claims, where a holder seeks to claim from the state previously reported property that the holder returned to the owner subsequent to the filing of the report. Section 3 conforms Delaware's unclaimed property statute more closely to the 2016 Revised Uniform Unclaimed Property Act (RUUPA), clarifying that foreign-addressed property that is reportable to (or specifically exempted by) a foreign country is not reportable to Delaware. This section applies to reports filed and property remitted after the effective date of this Act. This Section shall not be construed to allow for holder refunds under 12 Del. C. § 1144 for reports filed or property remitted prior to the effective date of this Act. Section 4 limits the filing of amended reports by holders seeking a refund of property when claims have been filed and paid on the property; when the original report was filed in conjunction with an examination or voluntary disclosure agreement submission; or after 3 years, when the holder seeks a refund due to an error in a cost of goods sold (COGS) calculation, as it usually pertains to the reporting of gift card property. This section is not intended to limit holder reimbursement claims, where a holder seeks to claim from the state previously reported property that the holder has since returned to the owner. Section 5 clarifies when the owner notice requirements enacted on February 2, 2017, took effect. Section 6 clarifies and confirms current practice that holders must pay and deliver property at the same time they file their report. Section 7 section enacts provisions that have allowed Texas to successfully pursue claims in bankruptcy for unclaimed property reported, but not paid to the state, prior to a bankruptcy, should Delaware pursue similar claims in the future. Section 8 clarifies the state’s indemnification obligations and definition of good faith generally and specifically for property reported "early" (before the full dormancy period has run). This section also establishes that the State Escheator may enter into written indemnification agreements with holders requesting to report and remit property "early" (before the full dormancy period has run). The amendment of this section to clarify the State Escheator’s complete discretion to grant or deny early escheatment requests under § 1155(b) merely recognizes the unreviewable discretion already provided under that section. Section 9 clarifies and confirms current practice, allowing the State Escheator to decline to take custody of physical property, including savings and bearer bonds, any property that may present a future litigation risk to the state, worthless or nonfreely transferable securities, and virtual currency for which no ready public market exists. Section 10 clarifies and confirms current practice, allowing the State Escheator to submit an affidavit after a review of business records and procedures as evidence of owner notice and publication. Section 11 eliminates inefficient administrative processes and ensures that unclaimed property reported as owned by state agencies and discretely presented component units included in the state’s annual comprehensive financial report of the state remains in the state’s General Fund to be allocated only via the conventional legislative budget process. This section is similar to a statute adopted by Illinois. Section 12 clarifies and confirms current practice that during an examination, the State Escheator may send or direct a holder or agent to send an owner notice letter (commonly called a “due diligence letter”) in the format specified by the State for any item identified as potential unclaimed property, including items that may be part of a sample population in conjunction with estimation, extrapolation, and statistical sampling, even if the item is not or would not be reportable to Delaware. Section 13 clarifies that requests to the Secretary of Finance to review certain discretionary determinations of the State Escheator during expedited examinations must be submitted in writing within 30 days of the State Escheator’s determination. Section 14 clarifies and confirms current practice that Voluntary Disclosure Agreements administered by the Secretary of State must comply with all provisions of this title. Section 15 states that Sections 1, 3, 6, 7, 8, and 9 of this Act take effect on enactment. Section 16 states that it is the intent of the General Assembly that Sections 5, 10, 12, 13, and 14 of this Act take effect upon enactment and also apply retroactively to any claims, examinations, voluntary disclosure agreements, or litigation pending as of the effective date of this Act. Section 17 states that it is the intent of the General Assembly that Sections 2, 4, and 11 of this Act take effect upon enactment and also apply retroactively to reports filed or property remitted prior the effective date of this Act. This Act also makes technical corrections to conform existing law to the standards of the Delaware Legislative Drafting Manual.

Senate Substitute 1 for SB 266 clarifies the process and roles of the Attorney General, State Escheator, and Secretary of State in actions under the Delaware False Claims and Reporting Act (DFCRA) for failure to comply with reporting requirements of the Delaware Unclaimed Property Law (UPL). The government, through the Attorney General, may bring such an action after a 120-day period during which the State Escheator may initiate an examination or within the 120-day period, with the State Escheator's consent. In addition, SS 1 clarifies how a whistleblower may submit information regarding a violation of the reporting requirements of the UPL and defines what payment a whistleblower may receive, in the event the State receives payment as a result of the whistleblower's information. SS 1 differs from SB 266 in that it sets forth specific criteria that must be satisfied in order for the Attorney General to bring an action for violation of the reporting requirements of the UPL.

This Act creates a civil penalty for any sale or display of ammunition that allows the ammunition to be accessible to a purchaser or transferee without the assistance of the vendor or an employee of the vendor. Ammunition in an enclosed display case, behind a counter or other customer access preventing device is not considered accessible for purposes of this section. This Act also requires that a deadly weapons dealer must include with their license application and renewal application a description of their theft and loss prevention policies and procedures as well as a report of all ammunition losses or theft within the prior year. Finally, the Act increases the maximum monetary penalty for violation of the provisions requiring a license to sell deadly weapons, sale to those under 21 or intoxicated persons, failing to keep required records, or failing to comply with the requirements for background checks between unlicensed persons. It takes effect 1 year after its enactment. This House Substitute No. 1 for House Bill No. 270 differs from the original in the following ways: It specifies that information related to theft and loss prevention policies and procedures is not subject to FOIA It changes the word “person” to “licensee” in sections 902 and 905. It specifies that the content of loss and prevention policies are not a basis for denial of a deadly weapons dealer license. It reduces all of the monetary penalties. It removes the shoplifting enhancement. It changes jurisdiction over the offense from JP Court to the Court of Common Pleas.

This Act ensures that educators hired after the effective date of this Act, who earned graduate degrees prior to becoming educators, receive credit on the salary schedule for those degrees regardless of the specific subject area of those degrees. Once an individual is employed as an educator, in order to receive credit for any graduate degrees earned after that time, such degree must be in the subject area in which the educator is employed.

This Act repeals the DELJIS Fund fee imposed on criminal defendants. The elimination of this fee was recommended by the Criminal Legal System Imposed Debt Study Group created by House Bill 244, as amended by House Amendment No 2, of the 151st General Assembly, in its December 7, 2023 report. Any outstanding balances owed for this fee shall be discharged upon the Act’s effective date. Per the Study Group’s recommendation, the Act will become effective upon the specific appropriation of General Fund monies to replace DELJIS’s full spending authority of the repealed fee.