Since the 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution was adopted on July 9, 1868, with Delaware ratifying it in 1901, at least 15 states have added a provision to their state constitution that prohibits the denial or abridgement of equal rights under the law based on race, color, or national origin. In 2019, Delaware amended the state constitution to prohibit the denial or abridgement of equal rights under the law based on sex, but no such prohibition exists as to race, color, or national origin. This Act is the first leg of a constitutional amendment to add race, color, and national origin to the Article I, § 21 of the Delaware Constitution to explicitly declare that protection against discrimination based on race, color, and national origin is one of Delaware's fundamental rights. This Act requires a greater than majority vote for passage because Article XVI, § 1 of the Delaware Constitution requires the affirmative vote of two-thirds of the members elected to each house of the General Assembly when the General Assembly amends the Delaware Constitution.
Sponsored bills
Juneteenth National Freedom Day commemorates June 19, 1865, the date news finally reached African Americans in Galveston, Texas that Abraham Lincoln had issued the Emancipation Proclamation freeing slaves living in Confederate states. In 2000, Chapter 269 of Volume 72 of the Laws of Delaware designated the third Saturday in June as Juneteenth National Freedom Day, a special day to be commemorated in this State by appropriate ceremonies. This Act designates the third Friday in June, Juneteenth National Freedom Day, as a legal holiday. This Act also makes technical corrections to conform existing law to the standards of the Delaware Legislative Drafting Manual.
This Bill amends Title 11 to require that custodial interrogations of children, at a place of detention, by a law enforcement officer, be electronically recorded. The Bill requires the law enforcement officer to prepare a written explanation if the interrogation is not electronically recorded. No electronic recording is required if the child refuses to be interrogated if the interrogation is recorded. The Bill contain an exception if the safety of the child, law enforcement officer or informant would be jeopardized. The prosecution has the burden of proving one of the Bill's exceptions for the admission of a child's statement that was not electronically recorded. Both law enforcement officer and agency have civil immunity for implementing and enforcing provisions of Bill. This Bill will become effective 6 months after enactment.
In January of 2015, the Office of Civil Rights & Public Trust was created by the Attorney General to establish a centralized office within the Department of Justice for the investigation of matters concerning civil rights enforcement and the prosecution of matters concerning violations of the public trust. This office must remain an independent entity within the Department of Justice to avoid conflicts with other Department of Justice duties and thus effectively enforce laws protecting the public trust and civil rights. Thus, this Act creates the Division of Civil Rights and Public Trust within the Department of Justice which will be separate from the other Divisions within the Department of Justice and have a Director who reports directly to the Chief Deputy Attorney General, to avoid conflicts of interest with the work of the other Divisions. This Act also clarifies the current scope of the Department of Justice’s ability to investigate and bring civil rights actions to protect the civil rights of all Delawareans.
In an effort to ensure the safety and wellbeing of dogs, this legislation improves shelter and tether standards in hazardous weather conditions, including clarifying restrictions on outdoor housing and tethering for dogs during hazardous weather conditions that pose a serious adverse risk to the health and safety of dogs. This bill also aims to improve public safety by prohibiting dogs from running at-large without a leash in public outdoor settings, with the exception of working dogs and permits dogs off leash on private property or where property owner has given the dog owner permission.
This bill requires all public and charter schools which have students in grades 6-12 to provide free feminine hygiene products in 50% of the bathrooms used by students who can have a menstrual cycle. This bill also requires schools to publish on its website and post in its common areas the locations of the bathrooms where the hygiene products are provided. Finally, this bill provides that each school must consult with its school nurse regarding the products to be provided.
This bill defines “industrial landfill” in conformity with the Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control’s Regulations Governing Solid Waste. This bill also establishes a height restriction, or vertical limit, for an industrial landfill at 130 feet above the mean sea level of the area.
This Act amends the Fiscal Year 2020 Bond and Capital Improvements Act to (1) reauthorize Appoquinimink School District project local shares; (2) redistribute Community Reinvestment Funds from the African American Heritage Institute to the Peoples Settlement Association and the Redding House Foundation; (3) redistribute Municipal Infrastructure Funds to the Ocean View Historical Society and amend the project description for the Town of Laurel; (4) reprogram Department of Correction funding from the Central Violation of Probation Conversion from Level IV to Level V Design and Construction to the JTVCC Perimeter Fence, Motor Pool Building Conversion to a Level V Vocational Skills Training Center, and Maintenance and Restoration; (5) revise the amount used for a feasibility study at Delaware State University and add authorization for renovations of a community building; (6) authorize the Department of Correction to use Maintenance and Restoration funding for drug treatment space, a design and location study for Plummer Community Correction Center, and a conversion of the Central Violation of Probation center; (7) authorize the use of City of Wilmington Education Initiatives funding for recreational equipment at Kirkwood Park for use by Stubbs Elementary School; (8) authorize the State via the Complete Count Commission to enter into a contractual agreement with a non-profit for census activities in Kent and Sussex counties; (9) transfer a Delaware National Guard vehicle storage facility to the City of Harrington; (10) authorize for a transfer of property from the Delaware National Guard to the Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control; (11) authorize a transfer of property from the Office of Management and Budget to the United States Government; (12) authorize additional reimbursements from the Community Transportation Fund; (13) authorizes the Department of Transportation to enter into contractual agreements with the Riverfront Development Corporation; (14) authorize the Department of Transportation to enter into agreements with the City of Wilmington and the Riverfront Development Corporation related to the redevelopment of South Market Street; (15) authorize the Brandywine School District to use minor capital improvement funds for site planning activities of the Charles W. Bush Early Education Center; (16) authorize the transfer of funds from the Office of Management and Budget to the Town of Laurel; and (17) allocate funding from the Delaware State Housing Authority to the Ministry of Caring.
This bill requires that inadvertent out-of-network services be included in individual and group health insurance policies as well as group and blank health insurance policies. This bill defines inadvertent out-of-network services are those services that are covered under a policy or contract of health insurances, but are provided by an out-of-network provider in an in-network facility, or when in-network health care services are unavailable or not made available to the insured in the facility. Inadvertent out-of-network services also includes laboratory testing ordered by an in-network provider but performed by an out-of-network laboratory.
This Act, known as the James Johnson Sentencing Reform Act, named for Representative JJ Johnson, makes significant changes to the sentencing laws in Delaware. Section 1. This section strikes most drug crimes from the list of violent felonies. This change recognizes that treating drug crimes in every instance as a violent crime is unnecessary as it increases the range of penalties and the presumptive sentence. However, the highest level of drug dealing will remain on the violent felony list since those offenders are most likely high quantity drug dealers or those at the top of a distribution pyramid. Section 2. This section makes changes to the sentence modification section of habitual criminal law to conform to current practice. The Superior Court has enacted court rules and procedures, and this section simply removes portions of the statute that have become superfluous due to the Court’s rules and procedures. Section 3. In 1989, Delaware abolished parole. Since then, there has been essentially no functioning mechanism to release an offender from Level V prior to expiration of his sentence, other than good time credit. While the current provisions of § 4217 of Title 11 have been in place since 1989, very few offenders are reviewed by the Board of Parole and the Courts each year. Under the current statutory scheme, the Department of Correction must initiate any and all applications, which then have to receive approval from the Board of Parole before finally being ruled upon by the Court. This section overhauls § 4217. It provides a functioning mechanism for the modification of the sentences of offenders who are old, sick, or have demonstrated extraordinary rehabilitation. Under this revision, a modification can only be granted on the basis of compassionate relief due to serious medical illness or infirmity, good cause, or prison overcrowding. Good cause means the offender has shown by conduct and attitude while in custody that risk of offending has diminished as evidenced by the administration of a professional accepted risk assessment instrument. Serious medical illness or infirmity includes the offenders who have a progressive and incurable illness that is expected to result in death within 2 years, a persistent or progressive illness that impedes the offender’s mental or physical capacities which significantly diminishes quality of life and requires a complexity or level of care that cannot be provided in a correctional setting, or a disease or condition where the offender is too ill or cognitively impaired to participate in rehabilitation or be aware of punishment, and the level of care needed for the offender cannot be provided in a correctional setting. Only certain offenders would be eligible for a modification of sentence under good cause. First, an offender has to meet certain eligibility requirements which are: (1) Have served 20 years at Level V; or (2) Be over 50 and have served 10 years. Good time credit cannot be used to determine eligibility. Second, the offender cannot be serving a sentence for specific crimes, namely the most serious and most sexual offenses. Once an offender is eligible, the Department of Correction determines whether that offender meets the requirement of good cause. If the offender does, the Department will file a petition in the Superior Court on the offender’s behalf. If the Department determines that the offender does not satisfy the requirement of good cause, the Department must put its decision in writing including the reason why. At that point, the offender can file a petition in Court, but must include the Department’s reasons for denying the offender’s request for relief. Once a petition is filed, the Court must appoint counsel for the offender’s first petition. There is no right to counsel on any subsequent petition. The petition must include notice to the Department of Justice so that notification can be made to any victims who may wish to provide input to the Court. In deciding the petition, the Court may modify the sentence, but only if the Court finds that the eligibility requirements are met, there is a suitable transition plan for the offender, and evidence has been presented showing that the offender poses a low risk to public safety by a modification. The Court may hold a hearing, request additional information or documentation, or deny the petition. If the Court denies the request, the offender may not file a subsequent petition for a period of 3 years unless otherwise ordered by the Court. Section 4. This section removes certain statutory impediments to becoming eligible for a sentence modification pursuant to § 4217. These include treatment and rehabilitation programs, education programs, and work programs. The reason for this is that many offenders cannot complete these programs, through no fault of their own, but rather because of their classification or learning disabilities. While this section removes the statutory impediments, the failure to complete required programs can be used by the Department to determine whether an offender meets the good cause standard under §4217. In addition, the Department can utilize internal disciplinary measures for offenders who refuse to complete programs. Section 5. This section repeals the provisions of Title 11 that created the Sentencing Accountability Commission. Section 6. This section establishes the Delaware Sentencing Accounting and Guidelines Commission. This Act places the Commission within the Criminal Justice Council to give the Commission the staff and support it needs to effect its purpose. The Commission has 17 voting members, many of whom are already represented on the current SENTAC. There are also 12 non-voting ex-officio members which include all entities in the criminal justice system. The Commission must meet at least 6 times a year and 8 members constitute a quorum. The Commission shall hire an executive director and additional personnel that are necessary to fulfill the responsibilities of the Commission. During the first 2 years, the Commission must review the existing sentencing guidelines and promulgate changes. The sentencing guidelines shall be the presumption in the sentencing of offenders. The guidelines will provide for a range of incarceration terms that are sufficiently narrow and proportionate to the crime. The guidelines shall also set forth a nonexclusive list of aggravating and mitigating factors. The guidelines will also provide bases for a departure from the presumptive sentence. The goal of the guidelines is to encourage judges to individualize sentencing decisions. The Commission will also develop, in conjunction with the Department of Correction, a community corrections strategy which will consider the existing community corrections programs within the State, the number of offenders, the level or resources, and the effectiveness of community corrections. The Commission will also work with the Department of Correction to develop a correctional-population model to project the future impact on the criminal justice system including the courts and Department of Correction. The Commission’s continuing responsibilities include revising the sentencing guidelines as needed, preparing a yearly correctional-population projection, data collection that tracks criminal cases through the court system and, investigating the existence of possible inequities and the corrections systems across population groups, such as groups defined by race, gender ethnicity and geographic location. The Commission will also enter and track applications made pursuant to § 4217 of Title 11 and their outcomes and investigate the existence of possible inequities in the processing and decision-making of such applications. Every 5 years, the Commission shall perform an omnibus review of the sentencing system. The Commission shall promulgate its sentencing guidelines and submit them to the Supreme Court no later than January 1, 2022 for adoption by court rule. The goal is that the sentencing guidelines will take effect April 1, 2022. Until then, the current guidelines created by SENTAC will remain in effect. Section 7. This Act is known as the “James Johnson Sentencing Reform Act.” Section 8. This section provides that Sections 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, and 7 take effect upon the Act’s enactment into law. Section 9. This section provides that §4217(d)(1)and (d)(3) take effect 120 days following the Act’s enactment into law. This means that the only petitions that can proceed after 120 days are those petitions initiated by the Department of Correction on the grounds of serious medical illness or infirmity or prison overcrowding. Section 10. This section provides that 4217(d)(2) takes effect 1 year following the Act’s enactment into law. This means that petitions on the basis of good cause can proceed 1 year after the Act’s enactment into law.