Rep. Bill Bush

The Delaware Energy Solutions Act of 2024 authorizes processes necessary to help meet the net zero goals of the Climate Change Solutions Act of 2023. The bill facilitates a transition to carbon-free energy sources by (i) preparing for offshore wind to be a significant element of Delaware’s energy future, if cost is competitive with other potential sources, and (ii) increasing options for interconnecting renewable energy resources to the transmission grid. The bill authorizes the State Energy Office (SEO), with the approval of the Public Service Commission (PSC), to issue solicitations to procure offshore wind. A solicitation can be for a project that serves only Delaware, or in coordination with other states, and authorizes procurement of at least 800 megawatts but not more than 1,200 megawatts of power to Delaware, in a single or multiple solicitations. Solicitations proceed through the following steps: The SEO drafts a solicitation for wind energy if it believes market conditions would result in a bid of no more than 110 percent of the “Delaware Benchmark Price,” defined as the average price that Delmarva Power has paid for power and renewable energy compliance over the prior three years. The Renewable Energy Task Force, an existing public body, must be consulted on the structure and factors of the proposed solicitation. The PSC evaluates the proposed solicitation and determines in a public process, with public comment, if issuing the solicitation would be in the public interest. If so, PSC issues a Preliminary Order allowing the solicitation to proceed. Municipal utilities and rural electric cooperatives are provided an option to participate in the potential project. Third-party “Qualified Purchasers,” such as those that currently purchase electricity for Delaware industries and utilities, could also participate. After preliminary PSC approval, SEO issues the solicitation. Pricing is the key factor, and the returned bids will also include information about avoided greenhouse gas emissions as well as environmental, economic, health and electric grid benefits to Delaware. The SEO cannot proceed to negotiate a contract unless a bid comes back with a price at or below 110 percent of the Delaware Benchmark Price. If contract negotiations occur, SEO confers with PSC staff in finalizing the terms of the contract. PSC reviews the proposed purchase contract to verify that the bid meets all statutory and solicitation requirements, including the examination of the bid price to ensure it is no more than 110 percent of the Delaware Benchmark Price, and is competitive with other new renewable or carbon-free energy projects in the region. If PSC approval is granted, Delmarva Power and any public utility that elected to participate would amend their rates to pass on the costs or savings of the project to their customers. In addition to allowing offshore wind procurement, the bill enhances the PSC’s current Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity (CPCN) process by giving the Commission authority to issue a CPCN in connection with renewable energy interconnection facilities, such as the transmission lines from an offshore wind project to a nearby substation, or the lines connecting a utility scale solar project (over 30 MW) to a nearby substation. The bill outlines the factors PSC should consider when granting a CPCN for renewable energy interconnection facilities. Additionally, the bill provides separate authority to the Delaware Department of Transportation to permit such facilities in a State-owned Right of Way under Title 17, once a CPCN is issued by the PSC.

This Act requires the Director of the Sustainable Energy Utility to administer a program to provide financial assistance to Delaware residents for the cost of purchase and installation of electric vehicle supply equipment. For a low-income applicant (meaning up to 300% of the federal poverty level for household income), financial assistance covering up to 90% of the purchase and installation costs may be covered. For all other applicants the program may offer assistance to cover up to 50% of the costs.

This Act requires new schools and state buildings over 50,000 square feet to meet certain requirements to ensure that the building's roof is able to support solar energy infrastructure.

This Act simplifies and in some cases increases the civil penalties for violations of laws related to dogs that run at large, dogs that bite a human being or domestic animal while running at large, and dogs that are designated as dangerous or potentially dangerous. It also expands the requirements for keeping or maintaining a dangerous or potentially dangerous dog to include provisions related to licensing, vaccination, microchipping, and leashing. The Act also makes changes to procedures of the Department of Health and Social Services (“the Department”) relating to dogs, including the following: (1) It removes an unused provision requiring that notification of the impoundment of a running at large dog be made to the dog owner in writing. (2) It gives the Department 15 days, rather than 5 days, to file a civil action after impounding a dog and identifying and informing the dog owner. (3) It changes from 48 to 24 the number of hours that an individual can confine a dog that is not the individual’s own before contacting the Department to report the dog. Senate Substitute No. 1 for Senate Bill No. 269 differs from Senate Bill No. 269 as follows: (1) It removes a provision that would have increased the amount of liability insurance that a dangerous dog owner must carry. (2) It expands the definition of “serious physical injury” to include injuries that pose serious or prolonged impairment to health and serious or prolonged loss or impairment of the function of any bodily organ. (3) It removes inaccurate cross-references from § 3074F and replaces them with references to the entire chapter. (4) It provides that a dog will not be considered dangerous or potentially dangerous if it injures a human being who is teasing, tormenting, abusing, or assaulting the dog’s owner or its offspring, in addition to the dog. The current § 3074F only allows this exception for torment, abuse, or assault of the dog itself. (5) It changes one of the criteria for declaring a dog dangerous to provide that the injury to the human being must be a serious physical injury. (6) It adds the definition of “domestic animal” that appears in § 3071F to § 3041F. (7) Throughout the bill, it changes “person” to “human being” when needed for accuracy and consistency. Senate Substitute No. 1 for Senate Bill No. 269 Act also corrects minor technical errors in Senate Bill No. 269 and makes additional technical corrections to conform existing law to the standards of the Delaware Legislative Drafting Manual.

This Act makes several changes to the civil asset forfeiture proceedings of this state. It repeals the legal presumption that money, negotiable instruments or securities found in close proximity to controlled substances or records or with trace amounts of controlled substances are forfeitable. Such evidence is still admissible and may be considered by the Court in a forfeiture proceeding. It puts the burden of proof on the State to prove all elements of a forfeiture case by a preponderance of the evidence. Under the existing statute, it is the burden of an innocent owner to prove that they did not have knowledge of or consent to the use of their property in an unlawful act. It prohibits the forfeiture of currency less than $500. It prohibits forfeiture unless a criminal charge is brought. It requires the person holding seized property to be financially responsible for all fees associated therewith in the event the property is ordered by the Court to be returned. It allows a claimant property owner who substantially prevails in a forfeiture proceeding to recover reasonable attorney’s fees and costs. The language in this section is modeled after a provision of the federal forfeiture statute, at 28 U.S.C. § 2465 that was put in place in 2000 as part of federal civil asset forfeiture reforms. It aligns forfeiture provisions in Title 11 with the forfeiture provisions in Title 16. It requires the Department of Justice to collect and annually report statistics regarding civil asset forfeiture.

This Act makes the crime of “patronizing a prostitute” a class E felony rather than a misdemeanor where the person from whom prostitution is sought is a minor.

Due to the rapidly increasing costs of materials and labor, combined with the frequency in which developers have gone out of business or otherwise been unable to complete work required within developments, this Act increases the funding required to be secured by a developer to ensure the developer fulfills the developer's obligations to construct and complete improvements within a subdivision. This Act also makes technical corrections to conform existing law to the standards of the Delaware Legislative Drafting Manual.

Sections 1 and 2 of this Act update Chapter 8 of Title 12, the Uniform TOD Security Registration Act. Section 1 of this Act does the following: (1) Adds a new definition to § 801 of Title 12 to define “cash equivalents”. (2) Amends the definition of “registering entity” in § 801 of Title 12 to confirm that registering entities may include securities dealers, banks, savings banks, trust companies, investment advisers, and other financial institutions that maintain securities accounts for customers. (3) Amends the definition of “security” in § 801 of Title 12 to confirm that interests in or obligations of a corporation; a limited liability company or any series of a limited liability company; a partnership, whether general or limited, or any series of a partnership; and a trust, including a common law trust, a voting trust, a business trust, or a statutory trust, or any series of a trust, constitute a “security” for purposes of the Unform TOD Security Registration Act. (4) Amends the definition of “security account” in § 801 of Title 12 to make ministerial changes to the language of the definition and to expand the definition to include investment management accounts, securities accounts, custody accounts, or other agency accounts for the investment or custody of securities maintained with a bank, a savings bank, a trust company, a securities dealer, an investment adviser, or other financial institution. Section 2 of this Act amends § 805 of Title 12 to confirm that registration in beneficiary form with respect to an uncertificated security or a security account need not include the names of beneficiaries if the names of all beneficiaries are otherwise maintained by the registering entity. This avoids, for example, any requirement for the book entry of an uncertificated security or the name of a security account to include the names of all beneficiaries, so long as the registering entity otherwise maintains the names of such beneficiaries. Sections 1 and 2 of this Act are not intended to override provisions of an entity’s operating agreement or governing provisions, and will take effect subject to any implementing requirements of the agreement or governing provisions, such as transfer or ownership restrictions. Sections 3 and 4 of this Act pertain to “letters of wishes” by trustors and add a new definition to § 3301 of Title 12 and a new subsection to § 3315 of Title 12. Letters of wishes have long been created by trustors as a means of assisting fiduciaries to understand the discretionary terms of the trust’s governing instrument, to understand the application of those terms as intended by trustors, and to assist fiduciaries to exercise distribution discretion. Accordingly, Sections 3 and 4 of this Act acknowledge existing and common practice by affirming that the standard of review of a fiduciary’s decision to consider or not to consider a letter of wishes is the same “abuse of discretion” (within the meaning of § 187 of the Restatement (Second) of Trusts, not §§ 50 and 60 of the Restatement (Third) of Trusts) standard described in § 3315 of Title 12. The new provisions recognize that a letter of wishes is a non-binding document intended to provide guidance and insight into the trustor’s intent relevant to a particular trust. New subsection (c) of § 3315 of Title 12 specifically provides 3 safe harbors for determining that a fiduciary has not abused its discretion, by stating that the following do not constitute an abuse of that fiduciary’s discretion: (1) the fiduciary’s decision not to consider a letter of wishes with respect to an unambiguous provision of the trust’s governing instrument; (2) the fiduciary’s decision not to consider a letter of wishes not meeting the criteria of the new subsection (c) of § 3315 of Title 12; and (3) the fiduciary’s decision to consider a letter of wishes meeting the criteria of the new subsection (c) of § 3315 of Title 12, with respect to an ambiguous provision of a trust’s governing instrument. In addition, the new subsection (c) of § 3315 of Title 12 provides that the letter of wishes is not binding on the fiduciary, that the fiduciary has no duty to follow the letter of wishes, and that the fiduciary’s exercise or non-exercise of a discretionary power does not create an inference that the fiduciary improperly exercised such power or abused the fiduciary’s discretion under § 3315(a) of Title 12. Sections 3 and 4 of this Act, however, are not intended to override the Court of Chancery’s decision in Bishop v. McNeil, 1999 Del. Ch. LEXIS 186, 1999 WL 743489 (Del. Ch. 1999), in which the Court declined to take into account a letter to construe the provisions of an unambiguous governing instrument for a trust because the letter was extrinsic evidence of trustor intent. Thus, Sections 3 and 4 of this Act are not intended to affect the law regarding the Court’s interpretation of unambiguous governing instruments for trusts, for which the Court may not consider extrinsic evidence, or to affect the law regarding the Court’s interpretation of ambiguous governing instruments for trusts, for which the Court may consider extrinsic evidence, including any such letter of wishes. Section 5 of this Act adds new paragraph (32) to § 3325 of Title 12 to provide trustees of trusts with a statutory power to hire, retain, and compensate providers of programs and education for trust beneficiaries that may help prepare the beneficiaries for inheriting wealth, by helping to develop wealth-management skills, enhance beneficiary mental health and well-being, particularly as those areas may be impacted by the trust itself, and to reduce the potential for the trust to disincentivize the beneficiaries’ productivity or impact their mental health or well-being. The trustee may provide these programs and services or may hire and pay third parties or affiliates from the trust estate to provide these services and, in each case, without diminution of the trustee’s regular compensation to which the trustee would otherwise be entitled to receive for serving as trustee. Section 6 of this Act amends § 3339 of Title 12, regarding designated representatives, to do all of the following: (1) Provide specifically that when a trustor appoints a designated representative for beneficiaries, the appointment may be with respect to beneficiaries who are minors, who are incapacitated, who are unborn, or whose identities or locations are not known and not reasonably ascertainable. (2) Make clearer that when notice of the appointment is required to be given to parents of the represented person or to a guardian of the property of the represented person, the requirement applies only to those beneficiaries who are minors or who are incapacitated. Section 7 of this Act adds new § 3345 of Title 12 to enable trustors to create what is to be known as a “Beneficiary Well-Being Trust” by expressly referencing § 3345 of Title 12 in the trust’s governing instrument. Section 3345 of Title 12 recognizes a growing concern of trustors that while there are many advantages to passing wealth through generations in trust, such as tax savings, creditor protection, consolidated investment and management, and protection of assets from imprudent waste, trusts may grow in value so that considerable wealth may become available to the beneficiaries, sometimes before beneficiaries have had an opportunity to learn and know the value of money and the personal and social responsibilities that access to wealth entails. The purpose of the Beneficiary Well-Being Trust is to provide wealth management training and services for the beneficiaries’ mental health and well-being and to educate beneficiaries about their family history and legacy, family values and dynamics, family governance, and philanthropy, all as more fully described in § 3345 of Title 12. The governing instrument of a Beneficiary Well-Being Trust may provide for additional powers, duties, rights, and interests of the beneficiaries, trustees, and advisers to the fullest extent permissible under § 3303 of Title 12. The trustees and advisers of a Beneficiary Well-Being Trust may provide beneficiary well-being programs or may hire and pay third parties or affiliates from the trust estate to provide beneficiary well-being programs and, in each case, without diminution of the trustee’s or adviser’s regular compensation to which the trustee or adviser would otherwise be entitled to receive for serving as trustee or adviser. Section 8 of this Act amends § 3547 of Title 12, regarding virtual representation, to extend the principles of the section by allowing a designated representative of a beneficiary under § 3339 of Title 12 to represent virtually those whom the beneficiary could virtually represent, including, under the circumstances already permitted under § 3547 of Title 12, someone who is a minor, is incapacitated, is unborn, or whose identity or location is not known and not reasonably ascertainable; a presumptive remainder beneficiary of a trust; a contingent successor remainder beneficiary of a trust; the holder of a power of appointment over a trust; or the beneficiaries of a trust that is itself the beneficiary of another trust, if there is not a material conflict of interest between the designated representative and those who are to be virtually represented. Section 9 of this Act provides an effective date for this Act and makes clear that this Act applies to trusts created before, on, or after the effective date of this Act.

Maddy summaryThis bill updates overtime pay rules for non-exempt employees working for the Delaware Department of Transportation. Starting July 1, 2024, these workers will receive time-and-a-half pay for any hours worked beyond 37.5 hours in a single week. The change applies specifically to the DOT and ensures that overtime compensation begins once an employee exceeds the standard 37.5-hour threshold.

This bill amends Chapter 69 of Title 18 relating to captive insurance to provide the Commissioner with additional flexibility to approve those types of financial institutions that would be authorized to hold required capital and surplus of captive insurance companies. This change would recognize the current financial environment and practices of financial institutions and captive insurers. Assets can be safely held in financial institutions other than banks and do not need to be held in Delaware in many circumstances where the type of risk does not require it, and the Commissioner will be authorized to impose additional conditions on captives related to capital and surplus to ensure the solvency and efficient operations of captives.