Photo of Tim Scott
R United States Senate · South Carolina

Sen. Tim Scott

Compare
Total votes
1,037
all sessions
Attendance
94%
67 missed
Near the chamber average
With party
96%
of cast votes
Higher than 94% of chamber peers
Bipartisan score
3%
crosses aisle rarely
Lower than 96% of chamber peers
Sponsored
934
bills & resolutions
Lower than 85% of chamber peers
Committees
15
assignments
934 bills and resolutions

Sponsored bills

Total
934
Primary
169
Co-sponsor
765
This page
934
matching current filters
Co-sponsor S 1582
Signed into law · Connecticut Senate · Co-sponsor
GENIUS Act

Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins Act or the GENIUS Act This act establishes a regulatory framework for payment stablecoins (digital assets which an issuer must redeem for a fixed value). Under the act, only permitted issuers may issue a payment stablecoin for use by U.S. persons, subject to certain exceptions and safe harbors. Permitted issuers must be a subsidiary of an insured depository institution, a federal-qualified nonbank payment stablecoin issuer, or a state-qualified payment stablecoin issuer. Permitted issuers must be regulated by the appropriate federal or state regulator. Permitted issuers may choose federal or state regulation; however, state regulation is limited to those with a stablecoin issuance of $10 billion or less. Permitted issuers must maintain reserves backing the stablecoin on a one-to-one basis using U.S. currency or other similarly liquid assets, as specified. Permitted issuers must also publicly disclose their redemption policy and publish monthly the details of their reserves. The act specifies requirements for (1) reusing reserves; (2) providing safekeeping services for stablecoins; and (3) supervisory, examination, and enforcement authority over federal-qualified issuers. The act allows foreign issuers of stablecoins to offer, sell, or make available in the United States stablecoins using digital asset service providers, subject to requirements, including a determination by the Department of Treasury that they are subject to comparable foreign regulations. Under the act, permitted payment stablecoins are not considered securities or commodities under law. However, permitted issuers are subject to the Bank Secrecy Act for anti-money laundering and related purposes. (Sec. 3) This section establishes that only payment stablecoin issuers permitted under this act are allowed to issue a payment stablecoin in the United States. Knowing violations of this requirement shall be subject to a fine of up to $1 million for each violation, up to 5 years imprisonment, or both. Treasury may issue regulations establishing limited safe harbors from this requirement that are consistent with the act's purposes, limited in scope, and apply to a de minimus volume of transactions.  Three years after the date of enactment, digital asset service providers are prohibited from offering or selling stablecoins that are not issued by permitted issuers. Providers are also prohibited from offering, selling, or otherwise making available in the United States a foreign-issued payment stablecoin, unless it complies with requirements provided in section 18 of the act. (Sec. 4) This section establishes requirements for permitted issuers. Issuers must maintain reserves on a one-to-one basis. Reserves must be comprised of U.S. coins and currency; demand deposits or shares at an insured depository institution; certain Treasury acts, notes, or bonds; money received under certain repurchase agreements or reverse repurchase agreements; certain investment company securities and money market funds invested in certain approved assets on this list; similarly liquid federal assets approved by regulators; or certain listed reserves in tokenized forms.  Issuers must comply with redemption requirements, such as establishing timely redemption procedures and disclosing such procedures and associated fees. Issuers must also report on the monthly composition of the issuer's reserves. These reports must be examined by a registered public accounting firm and certified by the chief executive officer and chief financial officer of the issuer. The section prohibits the rehypothecation, or reuse, of reserves with limited exceptions. Primary federal payment stablecoin regulators (federal regulators) and state payment stablecoin regulators (state regulators), where applicable, must issue regulations to implement capital requirements, liquidity reserve standards, reserve asset diversification standards, and risk management standards. Issuers are subject to the anti-money laundering and counterterrorism requirements that are applicable to financial institutions. The section sets forth requirements regarding activities of a permitted issuer, including by prohibiting issuers from providing services on the condition that a customer obtains an additional paid product or service from the issuer or a subsidiary. Large issuers (those with more than $50 billion in consolidated total outstanding issuance) must publish an audited annual financial statement in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The section prohibits a public nonfinancial services company from issuing payment stablecoins unless the company obtains unanimous approval from the Stablecoin Certification Review Committee. A state qualified payment stablecoin issuer with a consolidated total outstanding issuance of not more than $10 billion may opt for state regulation if such regulation is substantially similar to the federal regulatory framework under this act. If the issuance exceeds that amount, the issuer must transition to federal regulation, receive a waiver from the federal regulator to remain under state regulation, or stop issuing stablecoins until the issuance is under the threshold. (Sec. 5) This section establishes requirements for stablecoins issued by subsidiaries of insured depository institutions and certain entities chartered by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) to issue payment stablecoins. Federal regulators must establish an application process and a supervision framework for such entities. The section sets forth requirements for the review of applications, explanations for denials, and an appeals process. (Sec. 6) This section sets forth supervision, examination, and enforcement requirements for payment stablecoin issuers under federal supervision. The provisions include reporting on financial conditions, risk management, compliance with the act, and compliance with sanctions and anti-money laundering requirements. The section specifies that payment stablecoin issuers with less than $10 billion in consolidated total outstanding issuance are subject to federal supervision if they are not state qualified payment stablecoin issuers. The section establishes civil penalties for violations of this act that are committed by those subject to federal supervision. (Sec. 7) This section establishes state regulatory authority over issuers that qualify for and elect state regulation. The Federal Reserve Board may exercise enforcement authority over state issuers in unusual and exigent circumstances. The OCC must exercise enforcement authority over nonbank state issuers in these circumstances. (Sec. 8) This section requires foreign issuers to comply with the terms of lawful orders to be allowed to offer, sell, or make available for trading a payment stablecoin in the United States. The section sets forth enforcement and appeal provisions. Treasury may waive the prohibition against the secondary trading of foreign payment stablecoins in the United States from noncompliant foreign issuers on a case-by-case basis if certain criteria are met. (Sec. 9) Treasury must seek public comment regarding methods, techniques, or strategies for financial institutions to detect illicit activities involving digital assets and perform research and risk assessments on such methods, techniques, or strategies. Treasury must report their legislative recommendations to Congress and the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network must issue rules based on the results. (Sec. 10) This section establishes requirements for custodial or safekeeping services for payment stablecoin reserves, collateral, and the private keys used to issue stablecoins. Among other requirements, such property must be separately accounted for and not comingled with other assets of the custodian. (Sec. 11) This section addresses the treatment of payment stablecoins and stablecoin issuers in bankruptcy and insolvency proceedings, including their claim priority, conditions for an automatic stay, and the treatment of reserves as property of the estate. Federal regulators must also report on topics regarding potential insolvency proceedings of issuers. (Sec. 12) Federal regulators may, if determined necessary after an assessment, prescribe technical standards for issuers to promote compatibility and interoperability with other issuers and the broader digital finance system. (Sec. 13) This section requires regulators to issue regulations to carry out the act, with federal and state regulators and Treasury coordinating as appropriate. (Sec. 14) This section requires Treasury to study and report on nonpayment stablecoins, including endogenously collateralized payment stablecoins (a digital asset the originator of which has represented will be converted, redeemed, or repurchased for a fixed amount of monetary value and that relies solely on the value of another digital asset created or maintained by the same originator to maintain the fixed price). (Sec. 15) This section requires federal regulators to annually report on payment stablecoin activity trends, the number of payment stablecoin issuer applicants, and the potential financial stability risks to the safety and soundness of the broader financial system posed by payment stablecoin activities. (Sec. 16) This section defines authorities related to the act, such as by providing that the act does not limit the authority of a depository institution, credit union, national bank, or trust company to issue digital assets to represent deposits or shares. Federal financial regulators may not require a financial institution to include certain digital assets held in its custody as a liability on financial statements or balance sheets. (Sec. 17) This section establishes that payment stablecoins issued by permitted issuers are not securities or commodities under federal law. (Sec. 18) This section provides an exception to the act's prohibition on foreign-issued payment stablecoins. For the exception to apply, foreign issuers must be subject to regulation and supervision by a foreign country that is comparable to the requirements under this act, as determined by Treasury. The foreign issuer must also be registered with the OCC, hold sufficient reserves in a U.S. financial institution (subject to exceptions), and the country where the issuer is domiciled must not be subject to U.S. sanctions. The section sets forth requirements for Treasury's determination as to whether a foreign country has comparable regulatory and supervisory requirements, including the process of requesting a determination, the deadline for Treasury to render a decision, and the process by which Treasury may rescind a previous determination. The section also sets forth OCC registration requirements. Treasury may implement reciprocal or bilateral agreements between the United States and jurisdictions with comparable regulatory requirements. (Sec. 19) This section requires certain federal employees to disclose holdings over $5,000 of permitted payment stablecoins as part of required financial disclosures. (Sec. 20) The act takes effect on the earlier of (1) 18 months after the date of enactment, or (2) 120 days after federal regulators issue final regulations implementing the act.

Signed into law Jul 18, 2025 1 co-sponsor
Primary S 2237
In committee · Connecticut Senate · Lead sponsor
Hospital Inpatient Services Modernization Act

Maddy summaryThis bill extends the temporary waiver allowing hospitals to provide acute care at home until 2030, directly affecting hospitals participating in the Acute Hospital Care at Home initiative and the patients receiving care through this program. It requires the Department of Health and Human Services to conduct a detailed study by September 2028, comparing care quality, costs, patient outcomes, and experiences between home-based care and traditional inpatient hospital care. The study must analyze specific metrics like readmission rates, staffing ratios, treatment types, and patient demographics across participating and non-participating hospitals. The findings will be reported to Congress, providing data to inform future policy decisions about home-based hospital care.

In committee Jul 10, 2025 0 co-sponsors
Primary S 2228
In committee · Connecticut Senate · Lead sponsor
Modern Worker Empowerment Act

Maddy summaryThis bill amends the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) to clarify key definitions. It adds "as determined under the usual common law rules" to the definition of "employee" (Section 3(e)(1)) and inserts "employee" after "permit" in the definition of "employ" (Section 3(g)). These changes aim to standardize how worker classification is determined under existing law, directly affecting how the FLSA's minimum wage and overtime protections apply to workers. The bill does not create new benefits but refines the legal framework for applying current protections.

In committee Jul 9, 2025 0 co-sponsors
Co-sponsor S 2210
In committee · Connecticut Senate · Co-sponsor
Unlocking Benefits for Independent Workers Act

Maddy summaryThis bill changes how federal law determines if an independent worker (like a freelancer or gig worker) is classified as an employee. It prevents employers from using portable benefits (such as health insurance or retirement plans maintained without ongoing work) as a factor in that determination. Specifically, it prohibits considering whether a worker has access to benefits common to full-time employees, receives employer contributions to benefits, or contributes to benefits. As a result, independent workers who currently lack employee status for benefits may become eligible for protections like minimum wage, overtime, and unemployment insurance under federal law.

In committee Jul 8, 2025 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor SRES 290
Passed · Connecticut Senate · Co-sponsor
A resolution commemorating June 19, 2025, as "Juneteenth National Independence Day" in recognition of June 19, 1865, the date on which news of the end of slavery reached the slaves in the Southwestern States.

Maddy summaryThis resolution designates June 19, 2025, as "Juneteenth National Independence Day" to commemorate June 19, 1865 - the date Union troops in Galveston, Texas, delivered news of emancipation to enslaved people in the Southwest, months after the Civil War ended. It recognizes the historical significance of this date, when news of the end of slavery finally reached enslaved people in Texas. The resolution supports nationwide observance of Juneteenth to honor the emancipation of enslaved people and reflect on U.S. history. It does not create new laws or policies but formally acknowledges this date as part of the nation's heritage.

Passed Jun 25, 2025 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor S 2142
In committee · Connecticut Senate · Co-sponsor
GOLDEN DOME Act of 2025

Maddy summaryThe GOLDEN DOME Act of 2025 establishes a comprehensive missile defense architecture to protect the United States homeland from ballistic, hypersonic, cruise, and unmanned system threats. It creates a "Golden Dome Direct Report Program Manager" with significant authority to accelerate development and deployment of integrated air and missile defense systems, including space-based sensors, interceptors, and ground-based radars. The legislation allocates $23 billion for fiscal year 2026 to fund next-generation interceptors, space sensors, radar modernization, and other critical components of the defense system. It requires rapid testing of systems, prioritizes commercial solutions for cost efficiency, and mandates that combatant commands include missile defense requirements in annual budget requests. The Act focuses on creating all-domain awareness from the seafloor to space to provide early warning and effective defense against evolving missile threats.

In committee Jun 23, 2025 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor SJRES 13
Signed into law · Connecticut Senate · Co-sponsor
A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency of the Department of the Treasury relating to the review of applications under the Bank Merger Act.

Maddy summaryThis bill (SJRES 13) disapproves a specific rule issued by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) regarding bank merger reviews. The rule, published in the Federal Register on September 25, 2024 (89 Fed. Reg. 78207), would have changed how the OCC reviews applications for bank mergers under the Bank Merger Act. By passing this resolution, Congress has formally blocked the rule from taking effect, meaning the OCC must revert to its previous review process for bank mergers. This is a procedural action that directly affects the OCC’s regulatory authority over banking transactions.

Signed into law Jun 20, 2025 1 co-sponsor
Primary S 2116
In committee · Connecticut Senate · Lead sponsor
A bill to require the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States to annually review, update, and report on the facilities and property of the United States Government determined to be national security sensitive for purposes of review of real estate transactions under section 721 of the Defense Production Act of 1950.

Maddy summaryThis bill requires the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) to maintain and annually update a list of U.S. government facilities and property considered sensitive for national security - such as intelligence sites and National Laboratories. It mandates that each CFIUS committee member review their agency’s properties on this list each year by January 31 and submit recommended updates to the chairperson after agency approval. The committee must also report annually on all real estate transactions reviewed under this list, including completed reviews and any classified briefings requested by Congress. This formalizes an existing process into a structured annual requirement, directly affecting federal agencies and CFIUS oversight of foreign investments involving sensitive government sites.

In committee Jun 18, 2025 0 co-sponsors
Primary S 2118
In committee · Connecticut Senate · Lead sponsor
Value Over Cost Act of 2025

Maddy summaryThe Value Over Cost Act of 2025 amends federal procurement rules to allow government agencies to select "best value" over the lowest price when purchasing goods or services through multiple award schedules. It directly affects federal agencies (like the GSA) and contractors competing for government contracts under these programs. The bill adds a new option: agencies may choose the "best value" alternative - defined in existing regulations - as a standard practice, rather than automatically requiring the lowest cost, if the GSA Administrator determines it serves the government's best interests. This change applies to both civilian (41 U.S.C. §152) and defense (10 U.S.C. §3012) contracting.

In committee Jun 18, 2025 0 co-sponsors
Co-sponsor SRES 285
Passed · Connecticut Senate · Co-sponsor
A resolution designating July 16, 2025, as "Glioblastoma Awareness Day".

Maddy summaryThis Senate resolution (SRES 285) designates July 16, 2025, as "Glioblastoma Awareness Day." It aims to raise public awareness about glioblastoma, a highly aggressive and deadly brain cancer affecting thousands annually, and honors those impacted by the disease. The resolution encourages greater public understanding of glioblastoma's challenges and supports ongoing research efforts like the Glioblastoma Therapeutics Network.

Passed Jun 17, 2025 1 co-sponsor
Showing 121 to 130 of 934 bills
Previous 1 12 13 14 94 Next