Issue · Veterans

Veterans

Every veterans bill, vote, and legislator stance in Colorado, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
4
119th Congress
Top supporter
Lauren Boebert
69% support rate
Top opponent
Diana DeGette
29% support rate
Ranked legislators
9
4 support · 5 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving veterans in Colorado

Legislators moving veterans in Colorado
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Votes
Lauren Boebert
Lauren Boebert House · District 4
R
Support
69% 214
Jeff Hurd
Jeff Hurd House · District 3
R
Support
65% 222
Gabe Evans
Gabe Evans House · District 8
R
Support
65% 222
Jeff Crank
Jeff Crank House · District 5
R
Support
62% 221
Diana DeGette
Diana DeGette House · District 1
D
Oppose
29% 217
Joe Neguse
Joe Neguse House · District 2
D
Oppose
29% 221
Brittany Pettersen
Brittany Pettersen House · District 7
D
Oppose
29% 207
Jason Crow
Jason Crow House · District 6
D
Oppose
29% 222
John W. Hickenlooper
John W. Hickenlooper Senate
D
Oppose
33% 276
Showing 4 of 4 bills

All veterans bills

in committee · United States · House Nov 17, 2025

HR 6002: Veterans Earned Education Act

HR 6002, the Veterans Earned Education Act, amends eligibility rules for transferring Post-9/11 GI Bill educational benefits to dependents. It requires veterans to have completed at least 17 years of service (up from 6 years) and be retired under Chapter 61 of Title 10 to qualify for transferring benefits. The bill directly affects active-duty and retired veterans seeking to share their education benefits with family members. These changes tighten the service requirements for beneficiaries who wish to transfer their benefits, without altering the core education benefits themselves.
in committee · United States · House Jan 27, 2026

HJRES 144: Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Veterans Affairs relating to "Reproductive Health Services".

HJRES 144 is a congressional disapproval resolution targeting a specific rule issued by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) on December 31, 2025, which addressed "Reproductive Health Services" (90 Fed. Reg. 61310). This resolution directs Congress to disapprove the VA rule under Chapter 8 of Title 5, U.S. Code, meaning the rule would have no legal effect if passed. The bill directly affects the VA's implementation of reproductive health services for veterans, as it seeks to nullify the agency's existing policy. This is a procedural measure, not a substantive policy change, aimed solely at blocking the VA's rule through congressional action.
in committee · United States · Senate Mar 4, 2025

SRES 105: A resolution condemning the mass terminations of employees of the Department of Veterans Affairs carried out with no justification or analysis of the impact on veterans and their families.

SRES 105 is a Senate resolution condemning the February 2025 mass terminations of 2,400 Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) employees by Secretary Doug Collins, without justification or analysis of impacts on veterans. The resolution states the Senate opposes these terminations - specifically noting the lack of transparency about effects on critical services like mental health care, claims processing, and cybersecurity - and calls for all affected employees to be reinstated. This resolution does not change VA policy but expresses the Senate’s formal disapproval of the terminations and demands accountability. It was introduced by 30 Senators on March 4, 2025.
in committee · United States · Senate Mar 25, 2026

SJRES 103: A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Veterans Affairs relating to "Reproductive Health Services".

SJRES 103 is a congressional disapproval resolution targeting a Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) rule on reproductive health services for veterans. The resolution, if passed, would block the VA rule from taking effect by invoking the Congressional Review Act (Chapter 8 of Title 5, U.S. Code), meaning the rule published in the Federal Register (December 31, 2025) would have no legal force. This directly affects the VA’s ability to implement new guidelines for reproductive health services at its facilities, preserving existing policies instead. The resolution does not create new policy but halts a specific administrative rule.
Sub-Topics Women's Health