Issue · Veterans

Veterans

Every veterans bill, vote, and legislator stance in California, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
56
2025-2026 Regular Session
Top supporter
María Elena Durazo
100% support rate
Top opponent
Kelly Seyarto
0% support rate
Ranked legislators
6
5 support · 1 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving veterans in California

Legislators moving veterans in California
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Votes
ME
María Elena Durazo Senate · District 26
D
Strong +
100% 176
John Laird
John Laird Senate · District 17
D
Strong +
100% 176
Anna Caballero
Anna Caballero Senate · District 14
D
Strong +
100% 181
Laura Richardson
Laura Richardson Senate · District 35
D
Strong +
100% 197
Lola Smallwood-Cuevas
Lola Smallwood-Cuevas Senate · District 28
D
Strong +
100% 166
Kelly Seyarto
Kelly Seyarto Senate · District 32
R
Strong −
0% 220
Showing 21–30 of 56 bills

All veterans bills

signed · California · Senate Aug 11, 2026

SCR 113: Relative to Gold Star Mothers' and Families' Day.

SCR 113 is a ceremonial resolution that designates September 27, 2026, as "Gold Star Mothers' and Families' Day" in California. It does not create new laws or policies but formally recognizes families who have lost a member in military service. The resolution directly affects California residents by establishing an annual day of observance for these families. This is a symbolic gesture with no regulatory or financial impact, as it only proclaims a specific date for recognition.
passed · California · Senate Aug 10, 2026

SR 121: Relative to the Killed in Action flag.

California Senate Resolution 121 formally recognizes the Killed in Action flag as a symbol honoring military personnel who died in combat. The resolution encourages the voluntary display of this flag at state and local public buildings, schools, and private homes to express remembrance for fallen service members. It also suggests that Californians display the flag during specific observances such as Memorial Day, Veterans Day, and Independence Day. Finally, the bill directs the Secretary of the Senate to send copies of the resolution to the Governor, the Department of Veterans Affairs, and various veterans' service organizations.
signed · California · Assembly Aug 10, 2026

ACR 126: Relative to the Captain Vidar Anderson Memorial Highway.

This measure would designate a specified portion of State Highway Route 395 in the County of Mono as the Captain Vidar Anderson Memorial Highway. The measure would request that the Department of Transportation determine the cost of appropriate signs showing this special designation and, upon receiving donations from nonstate sources sufficient to cover the cost, to erect those signs.
passed · California · Senate Aug 6, 2026

SR 109: Relative to veterans.

This Senate resolution honors Korean American veterans who served in the Vietnam War and currently reside in California. It formally recognizes their contributions to freedom and democracy and expresses gratitude for their service. The bill also encourages ongoing cooperation between the United States and South Korea to support the welfare of these aging veterans. Finally, it directs the Senate Secretary to send copies of the resolution to state and federal officials and the South Korean consulate for distribution.
passed · California · Senate Aug 3, 2026

SR 120: Relative to Filipino American History Month.

Senate Resolution 120 establishes Filipino American History Month to recognize the long-standing contributions of Filipinos and Filipino Americans to California and the United States. The resolution highlights key historical events, including early immigration, service during World War II, and the significant role Filipino workers played in California's agricultural industry and labor rights movements. By documenting these achievements, the bill aims to honor the resilience and impact of this community throughout American history.
signed · California · Senate Jul 16, 2026

SCR 155: Relative to the Officer Kirk Leland Johnson Memorial Interchange.

This measure would designate the interchange at State Route 52 and Interstate 805 in the County of San Diego as the Officer Kirk Leland Johnson Memorial Interchange. The measure would request that the Department of Transportation determine the cost of appropriate signs showing this special designation and, upon receiving donations from nonstate sources sufficient to cover the cost, to erect those signs.
signed · California · Senate Jul 16, 2026

SCR 121: Relative to the Purple Heart Community.

This measure would designate a specified portion of State Route 162 in the County of Glenn as the Purple Heart Community. The measure would request that the Department of Transportation determine the cost of appropriate signs showing this special designation and, upon receiving donations from nonstate sources sufficient to cover the cost, to erect those signs.
signed · California · Assembly Jun 30, 2026

ACR 169: Relative to the United States Navy Sailor Noah Tobin Memorial Overcrossing.

This measure would designate a specified overcrossing on State Route 15 in the County of San Diego as the United States Navy Sailor Noah Tobin Memorial Overcrossing. The measure would request the Department of Transportation to determine the cost of appropriate signs showing this special designation and, upon receiving donations from nonstate sources covering that cost, to erect those signs.
signed · California · Senate Jun 25, 2026

SB 623: Automobile accidents: civil actions: transportation network companies.

(1) Existing law provides that in an action for the breach of an obligation not arising from contract, the measure of damages, except as provided, is the amount that will compensate for all the detriment proximately caused thereby, whether it could have been anticipated or not. This bill, with respect to a civil case, claim, action, or arbitration against a network company, its subsidiary, or an app-based driver, as defined, arising from an automobile accident, would, except as specified, prohibit the maximum recovery of a plaintiff for damages for any medical expense for services rendered by a lien-based provider, as defined, from exceeding the 70th percentile of FAIR Health, Inc.'s billed charges, or the 70th percentile of a comparable commercially recognized billed charges database for the same or similar service in the applicable geographic area at the time the service was rendered. The bill would prohibit certain evidence from being introduced that exceeds the recoverable amount. This bill would provide that if a medical lien, as defined, receivable, or right to payment has been sold or otherwise transferred, the maximum recoverable medical expense damages shall not exceed the total consideration paid or payable in connection with the transaction to acquire the lien, receivable, or right to payment, as provided. The bill would require any agreement relating to the sale or transfer of a medical lien, receivable, or right to payment, and the consideration paid or payable therefor, to be discoverable, and would prohibit an undisclosed lien sale or transfer from being asserted against a defendant, insurer, settlement, judgment, or settlement proceeds. The bill would also require certain medical lien financial relationships and attorney referral information to be discoverable. This bill would make it unlawful for an attorney representing a plaintiff under a contingency fee agreement in a civil claim, action, or arbitration, as described above, to refer a client to a health care provider in which the attorney or a member of the attorney's immediate family has a direct ownership interest. The bill would also make it unlawful for an attorney to fee split or receive other specified compensation in connection with the furnishing of lien-based provider medical treatment for a plaintiff and would make it unlawful for an attorney or law firm to provide specified compensation for referrals of clients to lien-based providers for lien-based treatment. The bill would also make other actions related to the reduction of a medical lien unlawful, as specified. This bill would provide that these provisions are severable. (2) The Passenger Charter-party Carriers' Act defines a transportation network company as an organization, whether a corporation, partnership, sole proprietor, or other form, operating in California that provides prearranged transportation services for compensation using an online-enabled platform to connect passengers with drivers using a personal vehicle. Existing law requires a transportation network company to conduct, or have a third party conduct, a local and national criminal background check for each participating driver, as specified, and prohibits a transportation network company from contracting with, employing, or retaining a driver if the driver, among other things, is currently registered on the United States Department of Justice National Sex Offender Public website, has been convicted of any of certain terrorism-related or human trafficking felonies or a violent felony or, within the previous 7 years, has been convicted of any misdemeanor assault or battery, any domestic violence offense, driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs, or any of a specified list of felonies. A violation of the act is a misdemeanor punishable by a fine, imprisonment, or both a fine and imprisonment. This bill would additionally prohibit a transportation network company from contracting with, employing, or retaining a driver if the driver has been convicted of specified offenses or, within the previous 7 years, has been convicted of other specified offenses, including driving under the influence of an alcoholic beverage or drug. The bill would require the background check to be performed prior to the activation of a driver's account and once annually thereafter, as provided. By expanding the scope of a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (3) Existing law, the Unruh Civil Rights Act, provides that all persons within the jurisdiction of this state are entitled to full and equal accommodations in all business establishments of every kind whatsoever, regardless of their sex, race, color, religion, ancestry, national origin, disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital status, sexual orientation, citizenship, primary language, or immigration status. This bill would provide that notwithstanding that act, a transportation network company or charter-party carrier of passengers, as defined, may allow a woman passenger on its online-enabled application or platform or a participating woman driver to indicate a preference to be matched with a woman driver or woman passenger, respectively, and facilitate passenger-driver matches based on such preferences. The bill would make these provisions apply retroactively, as provided. (4) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
signed · California · Senate May 29, 2026

SCR 154: Relative to Green Star Veterans and Families Day.

This bill designates May 4, 2026, as Green Star Veterans and Families Day. The measure directly affects veterans and their families by establishing a specific date for recognition. It does not create new laws, programs, or funding, but simply sets aside the day for commemoration. The text is a formal resolution that requires no further action to be effective.
Showing 21 to 30 of 56 bills
Previous 1 2 3 4 6 Next