Issue · Energy

Energy

Every energy bill, vote, and legislator stance in California, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
12
2025-2026 Regular Session
Top supporter
Jesse Arreguín
96% support rate
Top opponent
Tony Strickland
7% support rate
Ranked legislators
10
5 support · 5 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving energy in California

Legislators moving energy in California
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Decisive votes
Jesse Arreguín
Jesse Arreguín Senate · District 7
D
Strong +
96% 76
Juan Carrillo
Juan Carrillo House · District 39
D
Strong +
96% 25
Bob Archuleta
Bob Archuleta Senate · District 30
D
Strong +
96% 71
Aisha Wahab
Aisha Wahab Senate · District 10
D
Strong +
95% 87
Esmeralda Soria
Esmeralda Soria House · District 27
D
Strong +
95% 21
Tony Strickland
Tony Strickland Senate · District 36
R
Strong −
7% 67
Diane Dixon
Diane Dixon House · District 72
R
Strong −
8% 40
Marie Alvarado-Gil
Marie Alvarado-Gil Senate · District 4
R
Strong −
9% 33
Roger Niello
Roger Niello Senate · District 6
R
Strong −
11% 37
Brian Jones
Brian Jones Senate · District 40
R
Strong −
11% 36
Showing 11–12 of 12 bills

All energy bills

signed · California · Senate Oct 10, 2025

SB 770: Common interest developments: EV charging stations.

Existing law, the Davis-Stirling Common Interest Development Act, defines and regulates common interest developments, which include community apartment projects, condominium projects, planned developments, and stock cooperatives. Existing law imposes various requirements regarding the installation and use of an electric vehicle (EV) charging station placed in a common area or an exclusive use common area of a common interest development, including that the owner is required to provide a certificate of insurance that names the association as an additional insured party. This bill would delete the requirement that the insurance policy name the association as an additional insured party, and would correct an erroneous cross-reference regarding the amount of that insurance.
signed · California · Assembly Oct 6, 2025

AB 39: General plans: Local Electrification Planning Act.

Existing law, the Planning and Zoning Law, requires a city or county to adopt a comprehensive general plan for the city's or county's physical development that includes various elements, including, among others, a land use element that designates the proposed general distribution and general location and extent of the uses of the land in specified categories, and a circulation element that identifies the location and extent of existing and proposed major thoroughfares, transportation routes, terminals, any military airports and ports, and other local public utilities and facilities, as specified. This bill, the Local Electrification Planning Act, would require each city, county, or city and county, on or after January 1, 2027, but no later than January 1, 2030, to prepare and adopt a specified plan, or integrate a plan in the next adoption or revision of the general plan, that includes locally based goals, objectives, policies, and feasible implementation measures that include, among other things, the identification of opportunities to expand electric vehicle charging and other zero-emission vehicle fueling infrastructure, as specified, and includes policies and implementation measures that address the needs of disadvantaged communities, low-income households, and small businesses for equitable and prioritized investments in zero-emission technologies that directly benefit these groups. For these purposes, the bill would authorize a city, county, or city and county to designate a previously adopted similar plan that meets the above-described requirements, as specified. By increasing the duties of local public officials, the bill would establish a state-mandated local program. The bill would deem a plan adopted pursuant to these provisions as a regional plan for specified purposes. The bill would require that the above-described provisions only apply to a city, county, or city and county with a population greater than 75,000 residents. The bill would define terms for these purposes. The bill would include findings that changes proposed by this bill address a matter of statewide concern rather than a municipal affair and, therefore, apply to all cities, including charter cities. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Showing 11 to 12 of 12 bills