Issue · Budget & Taxes

Budget & Taxes (Business Taxes)

Every budget & taxes bill, vote, and legislator stance in California, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
47
2025-2026 Regular Session
Top supporter
Mike Gipson
100% support rate
Top opponent
Carl DeMaio
0% support rate
Ranked legislators
10
5 support · 5 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving business taxes in California

Legislators moving business taxes in California
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Votes
Mike Gipson
Mike Gipson House · District 65
D
Strong +
100% 12
Sharon Quirk-Silva
Sharon Quirk-Silva House · District 67
D
Strong +
100% 12
Tina McKinnor
Tina McKinnor House · District 61
D
Strong +
100% 12
Gail Pellerin
Gail Pellerin House · District 28
D
Strong +
100% 10
Jessica Caloza
Jessica Caloza House · District 52
D
Strong +
100% 10
Carl DeMaio
Carl DeMaio House · District 75
R
Strong −
0% 12
David Tangipa
David Tangipa House · District 8
R
Strong −
0% 9
Joshua Hoover
Joshua Hoover House · District 7
R
Strong −
0% 8
Kelly Seyarto
Kelly Seyarto Senate · District 32
R
Strong −
0% 8
Megan Dahle
Megan Dahle Senate · District 1
R
Strong −
0% 8
Showing 31–40 of 47 bills

All budget & taxes bills

failed · California · Assembly Feb 2, 2026

AB 1402: Fresh Start Grants: Personal Income Tax Law: credits.

(1) Existing federal law provides for the federal Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, known in California as CalFresh, under which supplemental nutrition assistance benefits allocated to the state by the federal government are distributed to eligible individuals by each county. This bill would require, beginning January 1, 2027, a county welfare department, for each person receiving CalFresh benefits, to determine whether that person is eligible for specified refundable tax credits. The bill would require the county welfare department to serve as the primary agency responsible for calculating and distributing the value of those credits to recipients in the form of a Fresh Start Grants, as provided, and would require the county welfare department, where a recipient is overpaid due to administrative error, to notify the individual and deduct the overpaid amount from future grants. The bill would also require county welfare departments to evaluate recipients of other specified programs for eligibility for Fresh Start Grants without duplicative documentation. The bill would establish the continuously appropriated Fresh Start Grants Fund in the State Treasury to provide these increased benefits. The bill would require the Franchise Tax Board, no later than June 30, 2026, and annually thereafter, to estimate the amount of credits to be issued pursuant to specified law for the subsequent taxable year, and request that the Controller transfer that amount from the Tax Relief and Refund Account to the Fresh Start Grants Fund, for allocation to county welfare departments to administer the Fresh Start Grants. By creating a new continuously appropriated fund, this bill would make an appropriation. By expanding the duties of county welfare departments, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill would require the State Department of Social Services to provide relevant information relating to the issuance of Fresh Start Grants to the Franchise Tax Board and county welfare departments, including the value of grants issued and the data necessary to ensure accurate distribution and tracking, as provided. The bill would also require the Franchise Tax Board to share any information with the State Department of Social Services and county welfare departments necessary to calculate the specified tax credits. The bill would make information shared by the Franchise Tax Board subject to specified law limiting the sharing and use of taxpayer information, the violation of which is a crime. By expanding the operation of a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill would require the State Department of Social Services to commission an independent study of the Fresh Start Grants Program in collaboration with the Franchise Tax Board and county welfare departments, as provided. (2) Existing law, the California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018 (CCPA) , grants a consumer various rights with respect to personal information that is collected or sold by a business. The CCPA defines various terms for these purposes. The California Privacy Rights Act of 2020 (CPRA) , approved by the voters as Proposition 24 at the November 3, 2020, statewide general election, amended, added to, and reenacted the CCPA and establishes the California Privacy Protection Agency (agency) and vests the agency with full administrative power, authority, and jurisdiction to enforce the CCPA. This bill would require the State Department of Social Services, county welfare departments, and all entities administering the Fresh Start Grants Program to implement data safeguards, as specified, and would require the California Privacy Protection Agency to monitor compliance with data security protocols, as specified. (3) The Personal Income Tax Law allows various credits against the taxes imposed by that law, including, in modified conformity with federal income tax law, an earned income tax credit, and authorizes a payment from the Tax Relief and Refund Account, a continuously appropriated fund, for allowable credits in excess of tax liability to an eligible individual that is equal to that portion of the earned income tax credit allowed by federal law, as determined by the earned income tax credit adjustment factor, as specified. The Personal Income Tax Law also allows a refundable young child tax credit against the taxes imposed under that law for each taxable year beginning on or after January 1, 2019, and a refundable foster youth tax credit for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2022, to a qualified taxpayer in a specified amount multiplied by the earned income tax credit adjustment factor, as provided. This bill, for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2027, would reduce the amount allowed as an earned income tax credit, a young child tax credit, or a foster youth tax credit by the amount received as a Fresh Start Grant. (4) This bill would include a change in state statute that would result in a taxpayer paying a higher tax within the meaning of Section 3 of Article XIIIA of the California Constitution, and thus would require for passage the approval of 23 of the membership of each house of the Legislature. (5) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
failed · California · Assembly Feb 2, 2026

AB 814: Personal Income Tax Law: exclusions: law enforcement retirement.

The Personal Income Tax Law, in conformity with federal income tax law, generally defines "gross income" as income from whatever source derived, except as specifically excluded, and provides various exclusions from gross income. This bill, for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2025, and before January 1, 2030, would exclude from gross income qualified payments received by a taxpayer during the taxable year. The bill would define qualified payments to mean either amounts received from a pension plan the taxpayer is the beneficiary of based on services performed as a peace officer, as defined, or amounts received as the beneficiary of an annuity plan set up for the surviving spouse or dependent of a person that lost their life in services as a peace officer, as specified. Existing law requires any bill authorizing a new tax expenditure to contain, among other things, specific goals that the tax expenditure will achieve, detailed performance indicators, and data collection requirements. This bill also would include additional information required for any bill authorizing a new tax expenditure. The bill would require the Franchise Tax Board to provide any data requested by the Legislative Analyst's Office to write the report, as provided, and would make taxpayer information received by the Legislative Analyst's Office subject to specified law limiting the collection and use of that information, the violation of which is a crime. By expanding the scope of a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. This bill would take effect immediately as a tax levy.
failed · California · Assembly Feb 2, 2026

AB 838: Taxation: renter's credit.

The Personal Income Tax Law authorizes various credits against the taxes imposed by that law, including a credit for qualified renters in the amount of $120 for spouses filing joint returns, heads of household, and surviving spouses if adjusted gross income is $50,000, as adjusted, or less, and in the amount of $60 for other individuals if adjusted gross income is $25,000, as adjusted, or less. Existing law requires the Franchise Tax Board to annually adjust for inflation these adjusted gross income amounts. For 2024, the adjusted gross income limit is $52,421 and $104,842, respectively. Existing law establishes the continuously appropriated Tax Relief and Refund Account in the General Fund and provides that payments required to be made to taxpayers or other persons from the Personal Income Tax Fund are to be paid from that account. This bill, for taxable years beginning on or after January 1 of the taxable year that includes the date on which funding is first authorized for purposes of this bill and for the succeeding 4 taxable years, and only when specified in a bill relating to the Budget Act, would extend the above-described renter's credit to spouses filing joint returns, heads of household, and surviving spouses if adjusted gross income is $150,000, as adjusted, or less, and for other individuals if adjusted gross income is $75,000, as adjusted, or less. The bill would also increase the credit amount for those years to $2,000 for spouses filing joint returns, heads of households, and surviving spouses and $1,000 for other individuals. In the event the increased credit amount is not specified in a bill relating to the Budget Act, the existing credit amounts and adjusted gross income limits, as described above, would be the credit amounts and adjusted gross income limits for that taxable year. The bill would require the Franchise Tax Board to annually recompute the credit amount and the increased adjusted gross income limits for inflation for taxable years following the first year in which the increased credit is operative, except as provided. The bill, for credits allowable for taxable years in which the above-described increased credit is operative, would provide that the credit amount in excess of the qualified renter's liability would be refundable and paid from the Tax Relief and Refund Account to the qualified renter upon appropriation by the Legislature. Existing law requires any bill authorizing a new tax credit to contain, among other things, specific goals, purposes, and objectives that the tax credit will achieve, detailed performance indicators, and data collection requirements. The bill would provide findings and declarations relating to the goals, purposes, and objectives of this credit. This bill would take effect immediately as a tax levy.
failed · California · Senate Feb 2, 2026

SB 566: Real property tax: Personal Income Tax Law: homeowners' exemption: renter's credit.

(1) Existing property tax law, pursuant to authority granted by the California Constitution, provides for a homeowners' exemption in the amount of $7,000 of the full value of a "dwelling," as defined, and authorizes the Legislature to increase this exemption. This bill, beginning with the lien date for the 2026–27 fiscal year, would increase the homeowners' exemption, for certain homeowners, from $7,000 to $50,000 of the full value of a dwelling. By imposing additional duties on local tax officials, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (2) The California Constitution requires the Legislature, whenever it increases the homeowners' property tax exemption, to provide a comparable increase in benefits to qualified renters. The Personal Income Tax Law authorizes various credits against the taxes imposed by that law, including a credit for qualified renters in the amount of $120 for spouses filing joint returns, heads of household, and surviving spouses if adjusted gross income is $50,000 or less, and in the amount of $60 for other individuals if adjusted gross income is $25,000 or less. Existing law requires the Franchise Tax Board to annually adjust for inflation these adjusted gross income amounts. This bill, for taxable years beginning on and after January 1, 2026, would increase this credit for a qualified renter to $550 for spouses filing joint returns, heads of household, and surviving spouses, as specified, if adjusted gross income is $50,000 or less, as adjusted for inflation, and to an amount equal to $275 for other individuals, as specified, if adjusted gross income is $25,000 or less, as adjusted for inflation. (3) Existing law requires any bill authorizing a new tax expenditure to contain, among other things, specific goals that the tax expenditure will achieve, detailed performance indicators, and data collection requirements. This bill would include additional information required for any bill authorizing a new tax expenditure. (4) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above. (5) Existing law requires the state to reimburse local agencies annually for certain property tax revenues lost as a result of any exemption or classification of property for purposes of ad valorem property taxation. This bill would provide that, notwithstanding those provisions, no appropriation is made and the state shall not reimburse local agencies for property tax revenues lost by them pursuant to the bill. (6) This bill would take effect immediately as a tax levy.
failed · California · Senate Feb 2, 2026

SB 268: Income taxes: gross income exclusions: state of emergency: natural disaster settlements.

The Personal Income Tax Law and the Corporation Tax Law, in conformity with federal income tax law, generally defines gross income as income from whatever source derived, except as specifically excluded, and provides various exclusions from gross income. This bill, for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2025, and before January 1, 2030, would provide an exclusion from gross income for amounts received from a settlement entity, as defined, by a qualified taxpayer, as defined, to replace property that is located in a city or county in this state and that was damaged or destroyed by a disaster or accidental or human-caused event for which a state of emergency or local emergency, as defined, was proclaimed. Existing law requires a bill authorizing a new tax expenditure to contain, among other things, specific goals, purposes, and objectives the tax expenditure will achieve, detailed performance indicators, and data collection requirements. This bill would include additional information required for any bill authorizing a new tax expenditure. This bill would take effect immediately as a tax levy.
failed · California · Assembly Jun 5, 2025

AB 1219: Personal income tax: rate.

The Personal Income Tax Law, in modified conformity with federal income tax law, imposes taxes on taxable income, as provided. This bill, for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2025, and before January 1, 2030, would revise the income tax rates and taxable income brackets by imposing an income tax rate of 1%, 3%, 5%, or 7%, instead of 2%, 4%, 6%, or 8%, as applicable, on specified taxable income. This bill would take effect immediately as a tax levy.
failed · California · Assembly Jun 5, 2025

AB 691: Personal Income Tax Law: credits: pet adoption and medical expenses.

The Personal Income Tax Law allows various credits against the taxes imposed by that law. This bill, for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2025, and before January 1, 2030, would allow a credit against the taxes imposed by that law for the qualified pet adoption costs, as defined, not to exceed $250, and the qualified pet medical expenses, as defined, not to exceed $500, paid or incurred during the taxable year. The bill would prohibit a claim for qualified pet adoption costs for more than one qualified pet, as defined, during the life of the taxpayer. The bill would additionally prohibit a claim for qualified pet medical expenses with regard to more than one qualified pet during the life of the taxpayer, as provided. In the case of spouses filing a joint return, the bill would apply these restrictions to each spouse separately. The bill would require a taxpayer to provide all information necessary to administer this credit, upon request and in the form and manner provided by the Franchise Tax Board, including, but not limited to, a declaration under penalty of perjury that the taxpayer has not previously claimed the credit. By expanding the scope of the crime of perjury, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. Existing law requires any bill authorizing a new tax expenditure to contain, among other things, specific goals that the tax expenditure will achieve, detailed performance indicators, and data collection requirements. This bill also would include additional information required for any bill authorizing a new tax expenditure. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. This bill would take effect immediately as a tax levy.
failed · California · Assembly Feb 2, 2026

AB 1428: California Affordable Childcare Act: Personal Income Tax and Corporation Tax.

The Personal Income Tax Law and the Corporation Tax Law impose taxes according to, or measured by, income derived from or attributable to sources within this state. This bill, for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2026, and before January 1, 2031, in addition to any other taxes imposed by those laws, would impose a tax at a rate of 0.5% on that portion of income in excess of $10,000,000 during the taxable year, except as provided. The bill would establish the California Affordable Child Care Fund in the State Treasury and would direct all revenues, less reimbursement to the Franchise Tax Board for the administration of the additional tax, to be deposited into that fund. The bill would continuously appropriate the moneys in the fund to the State Treasurer for the purpose of establishing a grant program for licensed child care facilities, as described. By establishing a new continuously appropriated fund, this bill would make an appropriation. This bill would include a change in state statute that would result in a taxpayer paying a higher tax within the meaning of Section 3 of Article XIIIA of the California Constitution, and thus would require for passage the approval of 23 of the membership of each house of the Legislature.
Sub-Topics Business Taxes
failed · California · Assembly Feb 2, 2026

AB 895: Personal Income Tax Law: Corporation Tax Law: credits: fast food restaurants.

The Personal Income Tax Law and the Corporation Tax Law allow various credits against the taxes imposed by those laws. This bill, for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2026, and before January 1, 2031, would allow a credit against those taxes to qualified taxpayers, defined to mean certain fast food restaurant franchisees or independent operators, in the amount of $12,000 per qualified fast food restaurant, as defined. Existing law requires any bill authorizing a new tax expenditure to contain, among other things, specific goals that the tax expenditure will achieve, detailed performance indicators, and data collection requirements. This bill also would include additional information required for any bill authorizing a new tax expenditure. This bill would take effect immediately as a tax levy.
failed · California · Assembly Feb 2, 2026

AB 386: Personal Income Tax Law: Corporation Tax Law: credits: student loan payments.

(1) The Personal Income Tax Law and the Corporation Tax Law allow various credits against the taxes imposed by those laws. This bill, for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2027, and before January 1, 2032, would allow a credit against those taxes to a qualified taxpayer for student loan payments, as defined, made by the qualified taxpayer on behalf of a qualified full-time employee, as defined, not to exceed $3,000 per employee during the taxable year. The bill would define qualified taxpayer for this purpose to mean a taxpayer whose employees do not perform jobs described by specified federal law. The bill would limit the aggregate amount of credits allocated to $25,000,000 per year, and would require the Franchise Tax Board, in coordination with the Student Aid Commission, to allocate the credit through tentative credit reservations, as described. (2) The Personal Income Tax Law, in modified conformity with federal income tax law, generally defines "gross income" as income from whatever source derived, except as specifically excluded, and provides various exclusions from gross income. This bill, for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2027, and before January 1, 2032, would provide an exclusion from gross income for student loan payments made by a qualifying employer, as defined, on behalf of a qualified taxpayer, as defined, that is a full-time employee. (3) Existing law requires a bill authorizing a new tax expenditure to contain, among other things, specific goals the tax expenditure will achieve, detailed performance indicators, and data collection requirements. This bill would include additional information required for any bill authorizing a new tax expenditure. (4) This bill would take effect immediately as a tax levy.
Showing 31 to 40 of 47 bills
Previous 1 3 4 5 Next