Issue · Budget & Taxes

Budget & Taxes

Every budget & taxes bill, vote, and legislator stance in California, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
12
2025-2026 Regular Session
Top supporter
Steve Padilla
97% support rate
Top opponent
Natasha Johnson
4% support rate
Ranked legislators
10
5 support · 5 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving budget & taxes in California

Legislators moving budget & taxes in California
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Decisive votes
Steve Padilla
Steve Padilla Senate · District 18
D
Strong +
97% 69
Jesse Arreguín
Jesse Arreguín Senate · District 7
D
Strong +
97% 100
Susan Rubio
Susan Rubio Senate · District 22
D
Strong +
97% 65
Darsh Patel
Darsh Patel House · District 76
D
Strong +
97% 61
Esmeralda Soria
Esmeralda Soria House · District 27
D
Strong +
97% 61
Natasha Johnson
Natasha Johnson House · District 63
R
Strong −
4% 49
Kelly Seyarto
Kelly Seyarto Senate · District 32
R
Strong −
4% 114
Brian Jones
Brian Jones Senate · District 40
R
Strong −
5% 59
Stan Ellis
Stan Ellis House · District 32
R
Strong −
6% 72
Ali Macedo
Ali Macedo House · District 33
R
Strong −
6% 80
Showing 11–12 of 12 bills

All budget & taxes bills

signed · California · Assembly Oct 1, 2025

AB 752: Child daycare facilities.

Existing law, the California Child Day Care Facilities Act, provides for the licensure and regulation of daycare centers and family daycare homes by the State Department of Social Services. Under existing law, the use of a home as a small or large family daycare home is considered a residential use of property and a use by right for the purposes of all local ordinances, including zoning ordinances, and a local jurisdiction is prohibited from imposing a business license, fee, or tax for the privilege of operating a small or large family daycare home. Existing law also exempts small and large family daycare homes from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act. This bill would similarly require a daycare center, as defined, when colocated with multifamily housing, to be considered a residential use of property and a use by right, as defined. The bill would similarly prohibit a local jurisdiction from imposing a charge, tax, or fee for a business license, equivalent instrument, or permit for the privilege of operating a daycare center that is colocated with multifamily housing. The bill would include findings that changes proposed by this bill address a matter of statewide concern rather than a municipal affair and, therefore, apply to all cities, including charter cities.
signed · California · Assembly Sep 22, 2025

AB 564: Cannabis: excise tax: rate increase suspension: report.

Existing law, the Control, Regulate and Tax Adult Use of Marijuana Act (AUMA) , an initiative measure, authorizes a person who obtains a state license under AUMA to engage in commercial adult-use cannabis activity pursuant to that license and applicable local ordinances. The Medicinal and Adult-Use Cannabis Regulation and Safety Act (MAUCRSA) , among other things, consolidates the licensure and regulation of commercial medicinal and adult-use cannabis activities and establishes the Department of Cannabis Control (DCC) within the Business, Consumer Services, and Housing Agency to administer the act. Existing law, the Cannabis Tax Law, imposes an excise tax upon purchasers of cannabis or cannabis products sold in this state at the rate of 15% of the gross receipts of any retail sale by a cannabis retailer, and, as enacted by AUMA, imposed a cultivation tax on all harvested cannabis that entered the commercial market, as specified. Chapter 56 of the Statutes of 2022 (AB 195) amended AUMA to, among other things, discontinue the imposition of the cultivation tax on July 1, 2022. AB 195, beginning in the 2025–26 fiscal year and every 2 years thereafter, requires the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration (CDTFA) to adjust the cannabis excise tax rate by a percentage that will generate an amount of revenue that would have been collected pursuant to the cultivation tax imposed prior to its discontinuation, as specified, not to exceed 19% of the gross receipts of retail sale. Pursuant to that law, the department increased the cannabis excise tax rate to 19% for the 2025–26 fiscal year. This bill would revise the above-described provisions governing the cannabis excise tax rate. Specifically, the bill, for the period from July 1, 2025, to September 30, 2025, inclusive, would retain the existing cannabis excise tax rate of 19%. For the period from October 1, 2025, to June 30, 2028, inclusive, the bill would decrease the excise tax rate to 15%. Beginning in the 2028–29 fiscal year and every 2 years thereafter, the bill would require the department to adjust the cannabis excise tax rate by a percentage that will generate an amount of revenue that would have been collected pursuant to the cultivation tax imposed prior to its discontinuation, as specified, not to exceed 19%. The bill would also require the DCC, in consultation with the CDTFA and the Legislative Analyst's Office, on or before October 1, 2027, to submit a report to the Legislature that analyzes, among other things, the current and future effect of the Cannabis Tax Law on the regulated cannabis market and recommends options for changes to the Cannabis Tax Law to accomplish the intent of AUMA. Existing law requires any bill authorizing a new tax expenditure to contain, among other things, specific goals that the tax expenditure will achieve, detailed performance indicators, and data collection requirements. This bill also would include additional information required for any bill authorizing a new tax expenditure. This bill would take effect immediately as a tax levy.
Showing 11 to 12 of 12 bills