Rep. Sarah Liguori

Maddy summaryHB 2360 protects nonpublic schools that accept Arizona Empowerment Scholarship Account (ESA) funds by preventing them from being forced to change their religious, educational, or admissions policies. It prohibits these schools from requiring parents to disclose whether a student uses an ESA or the amount in their ESA account as a condition for enrollment. The bill also states that schools accepting ESA funds are not considered government agents and shifts the burden of proof to the state if a legal challenge arises over the law's application. This directly affects nonpublic schools participating in Arizona's ESA program and ensures parental privacy regarding scholarship usage.

Maddy summaryHB 2347 protects individuals who assist others during drug-related overdoses from criminal prosecution for drug possession or use. It requires people at overdose scenes to provide reasonable assistance (like calling 911) without endangering themselves, and shields both the helper and the overdose victim from charges related to the drug offense if medical help was sought. The law explicitly states that seeking medical assistance may be considered a mitigating factor in other criminal cases, while still allowing evidence collection and arrests for unrelated crimes. It defines "reasonable assistance" as contacting emergency services and "medical assistance" as care from licensed professionals.

Maddy summaryHB 2465 is a procedural bill that repeals Section 13-3605 of Arizona’s Revised Statutes. It does not create new policies or affect specific groups, as it solely removes an existing legal provision. The bill is currently in its early legislative stage, having received its first House reading on June 27, 2025. The summary cannot describe the repealed law’s content, as the bill text does not specify what Section 13-3605 previously regulated.

Maddy summaryHB 2740 prevents Arizona cities and towns from banning or restricting short-term rentals (like vacation rentals) based on their classification or use. It allows local governments to regulate only in specific areas: protecting public health/safety (e.g., fire codes), applying zoning rules equally to all properties, banning rentals for prohibited uses (e.g., illegal drugs), and requiring owners to provide tax license details and emergency contact information. The bill mandates a local permit system with a $500 fee cap, requires $500,000 liability insurance (or use of platforms with equivalent coverage), and forces owners of new accessory dwelling units (built after Sept. 2024) to reside on-site if renting them out. Cities must process permits within 30 business days and may impose $1,000 civil penalties for non-compliance with permit or contact requirements.

Maddy summaryHB 2463 repeals Section 36-3604 of the Arizona Revised Statutes, which prohibited abortion services provided through telemedicine. This repeal removes a specific legal restriction that previously blocked telehealth providers from offering abortion care in Arizona. The bill does not create new abortion policies but eliminates an existing prohibition on telemedicine for abortion services. As a result, abortion providers could potentially offer telemedicine-based abortion care without violating this statute if the bill becomes law.

Maddy summaryHB 2743 repeals a requirement for healthcare providers in Arizona to report certain abortion-related data to the state. It directly affects healthcare facilities and providers who previously had to submit this information under Arizona Revised Statutes Title 36, chapter 20, article 2. The bill removes this specific reporting obligation by eliminating the referenced statute from state law. This is a straightforward repeal of an existing administrative requirement with no new provisions or funding.

Maddy summaryHB 2806 commits Arizona to the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact (NPVIC), requiring the state to award its electoral votes to the presidential candidate who wins the nationwide popular vote. If enough states join the compact to control 270 electoral votes (a majority), Arizona would certify its electors based on the national popular vote winner, not the state's winner. The bill adds a new chapter to Arizona law outlining how member states would coordinate to implement this system, including requiring states to share vote totals and certify electors for the national popular vote winner. This affects Arizona's election process and its presidential electors, but only takes effect once the compact reaches the required threshold of electoral votes.

Maddy summaryHB 2744, titled the "Arizona Right to Contraception Act," establishes a legal right for Arizonans to access contraception and for health professionals to provide it. The bill prohibits any state or local law that singles out contraception services or makes access harder - such as requiring special permits for birth control or restricting where it can be distributed. It also mandates that patients must give voluntary, informed consent for sterilization procedures. This bill does not create new access to contraception but aims to protect existing access by preventing restrictive laws targeting contraceptive care.

Maddy summaryHB 2889 amends Arizona's ESA (Arizona Empowerment Scholarship Account) program to clarify eligible uses of funds and enhance transparency. It expands allowable expenses to include therapies for students with special needs, vocational training, assistive technology, and transportation, while requiring parents to use funds only at qualified schools meeting specific safety standards. The bill mandates a new transparency portal for public reporting of ESA fund usage and adds requirements for annual education plans for students nearing age 22 to maintain eligibility. This directly affects Arizona parents and students enrolled in ESAs, ensuring funds are used for education-related expenses as defined by the state.

Maddy summaryThe bill title "HB 2746: abortion; providers; waiting period; ultrasound" does not match the provided bill text, which amends Arizona's nursing board regulations (Section 32-1606, A.R.S.). The text states the board lacks authority to decide scope of practice for abortion (referencing A.R.S. §36-2151) but contains no provisions about waiting periods, ultrasounds, or abortion access. Instead, it details the nursing board's powers, such as licensing, disciplinary actions, and program approvals. This appears to be a mislabeled bill; no concrete policy changes related to abortion are described in the text.