Maddy summaryHB 2022 amends Arizona election laws to consolidate voting dates for local elections. It moves the primary election date from the first Tuesday in August to the first Tuesday in July, and establishes specific consolidated dates (like March 2nd Tuesday, May 3rd Tuesday, and November 1st Tuesday) for most local elections held in even-numbered years. This affects cities, towns, counties, school districts, and community college districts by limiting when they can hold candidate elections and special elections. The bill also maintains November 1st Tuesday as the required date for property tax and transaction privilege tax elections. These changes aim to reduce costs and increase voter participation by standardizing election schedules across the state.
Sponsored bills
Maddy summaryHB 2921 requires Arizona public school districts to provide daily physical education for all K-12 students, with at least 60% of that time spent in moderate activity. The bill mandates instruction including team activities (like dance), career pathways in health/fitness, and skills for lifelong physical activity. Exceptions allow excusal for students on school sports teams (with minimum weekly activity), medical reasons, chronic health conditions, IEP team decisions, or parental requests. It also prohibits outdoor activities during extreme weather, directly affecting all public school students and their districts' physical education programs.
Maddy summaryHB 2555 requires Arizona retail businesses with physical locations to accept cash for transactions of $100 or less without charging fees or penalties. It directly affects in-person retail stores (excluding online sales) by mandating cash acceptance and creating a legal remedy: customers denied cash payments or charged fees can sue for $1,000 per violation (capped at $5,000 per person), plus attorney fees. The law exempts businesses with pre-agreed written payment terms and online transactions. Damages adjust annually for inflation, but the bill does not apply to digital services or agreements specifying payment methods.
Maddy summaryHB 2366 limits Arizona election precincts to a maximum of 2,500 registered voters and prohibits the use of voting centers (where voters can choose any location in the county) for regular elections, requiring each precinct to have a designated polling place. County election boards must now establish precincts within the voter limit and cannot replace designated polling places with centralized voting centers. Emergency voting centers are permitted only with a specific, recorded vote by the board for a single election, under strict conditions. This bill affects county election boards and changes how polling locations are organized for regular elections, taking effect in 2026.
Maddy summaryHB 2556 creates "law enforcement support special plates" for Arizona vehicle owners. To obtain these plates, individuals must pay a one-time $32,000 fee to the state department (not an annual fee), which funds the program. The $25 annual special plate fee includes a $17 contribution to a dedicated law enforcement support fund, with the remaining $8 covering administrative costs. This affects only owners who choose to purchase these specific plates, not all drivers. The plates must be designed by the payer (with state approval) and may be combined with personalized plate requests.
Maddy summaryHCR 2055 is a voter referendum (not enacted law) proposing that Arizona declare drug cartels "terrorist organizations" under state law and direct the Arizona Department of Homeland Security to address this threat. It defines "drug cartel" as groups engaging in human smuggling, drug trafficking, or terrorism, and states that this declaration does not affect asylum claims under federal law. The resolution cites voter-approved Proposition 314 and findings about border security concerns, including fentanyl trafficking and border crossings by individuals on terrorist watchlists. This measure failed to pass in the June 27, 2025, vote and did not become law.
Maddy summaryHCR 2007 proposes a constitutional amendment to clarify Arizona's aircraft license tax law. It would establish a license tax on aircraft registered in Arizona (replacing all property taxes on qualifying aircraft) while explicitly excluding commercial airlines, aircraft dealers' inventory, nonresidents operating under 90 days, and government/public service aircraft. The amendment requires voter approval and aims to resolve ambiguities in the current tax structure without creating new taxes or changing existing exemptions. This affects all aircraft owners in Arizona subject to the license tax, excluding the specified categories.
Maddy summaryHCR 2005 is a proposed constitutional amendment to Arizona's Article IX, Section 3, clarifying existing tax language. It would require that all state taxes explicitly state their purpose (which must be followed) and mandate that taxes collected for state purposes be paid into the state treasury in money only. This amendment does not create new taxes or change tax rates; it only refines the constitutional wording governing how annual taxes are structured and applied. The proposal requires voter approval at the next general election, as specified in Arizona's constitution.
Maddy summaryHCR 2008 is a proposed voter referendum that would clarify Arizona’s existing food safety law. It amends Section 36-972 to explicitly state that the law applies to anyone who displays, sells, or offers for sale bulk food at retail. If approved by voters, this technical correction would become law but would not change current regulations - only make the scope clearer for retailers. The measure requires voter approval at the next general election, as mandated by Arizona’s Constitution.
Maddy summaryHB 2041 is a technical correction to Arizona law that clarifies where parking restrictions apply under existing air quality rules. It amends Arizona Revised Statutes § 49-552 to specify that cities, towns, counties, school districts, and special districts must prohibit parking vehicles not meeting air quality standards (per § 49-542) in employee parking lots within "area A or area B" as defined in § 49-541. The bill does not create new requirements but ensures enforcement aligns with current definitions. It directly affects local government entities managing employee parking lots. The bill is procedural and has only recently been prefilled and read in the House.