Rep. Michael Way

Maddy summaryHB 2766 requires Arizona cities and towns to apply municipal sales taxes uniformly to all food items (without differential rates), while exempting most food for home consumption, food packaging, and sales paid with SNAP benefits. It specifically excludes candy, confectionaries, soft drinks, and soda from the general food exemption, ensuring these remain taxable. The bill also exempts low-cost food sales to vulnerable groups (elderly, homeless, disabled) when purchased using SNAP benefits through approved programs. This amendment, effective January 1, 2026, modifies existing tax code to standardize food taxation and expand specific exemptions.

Maddy summaryHB 2707 prohibits health professionals and health care institutions in Arizona from denying care or providing substandard care based on a patient's vaccination status. The bill makes it unprofessional conduct for health professionals to discriminate in this way and bans health care institutions from adopting policies allowing such discrimination. It directly affects hospitals, clinics, and medical providers by requiring them to treat all patients equally regardless of vaccination status. The law changes existing professional standards to explicitly forbid this form of discrimination in healthcare settings.

Maddy summaryHB 2055 creates a new exemption from required immunizations (for school, work, or licensing) if no vaccine meets seven specific safety and transparency criteria. These criteria include long-term cancer/fertility studies, two-year clinical trials with placebo comparison, public reporting of vaccine injuries, combined vaccine safety data, proof the vaccine is safer than the disease itself, and manufacturer liability for defects. The exemption applies to individuals or their dependents and cannot be restricted by state agencies. It does not change existing immunization requirements but establishes this narrow path for those whose vaccine fails to meet all seven criteria.

Maddy summaryHB 2102 establishes a dedicated anti-racketeering revolving fund in Arizona to manage money recovered from racketeering prosecutions. It requires all recovered funds - such as attorney fees from civil/criminal cases under AZ statutes 13-2301 or 13-2312, forfeiture proceeds, or federal/state cooperative investigation funds - to be deposited into this fund, prohibiting transfers to the general state fund. The fund may finance gang/victim prevention programs, racketeering investigations, officer relocation costs, and administrative reporting, but bans using it for Attorney General’s office salaries after August 2025. All agencies receiving fund monies must submit quarterly reports on sources and expenditures to the Attorney General and Arizona Criminal Justice Commission, with strict deadlines and penalties for noncompliance.

Maddy summaryHB 2520 amends Arizona's duress defense law to limit when a defendant can claim they committed a crime due to threats of immediate physical force. Specifically, the defense cannot be used if the defendant intentionally created the situation where they faced duress, or for offenses involving homicide, serious physical injury, or certain violent crimes like aggravated assault or sexual offenses. This change directly affects criminal defendants in cases where they attempt to justify their actions using duress as a legal defense. The bill clarifies that the duress defense is unavailable for the most serious violent offenses, making it harder for defendants to avoid responsibility for those acts.

Maddy summaryHB 2199 requires that advertisements for prescription and nonprescription drugs on TV, radio, or online must clearly present major side effects and usage restrictions ("major statement") at the same volume, clarity, and pace as the rest of the ad. It prohibits using distracting audio or visual elements that could interfere with understanding these critical health details. The bill directly affects drug manufacturers and advertisers operating in Arizona. If passed, it would mandate that health risks are communicated as prominently as promotional content in digital and broadcast ads.

Maddy summaryThis bill allocates $39.6 million from the state general fund for fiscal year 2025-2026 to extend State Route 24 in Queen Creek, including a new interchange at Ironwood Road. The funds are specifically for the town of Queen Creek to cover all necessary project expenses, with the requirement that Queen Creek collaborate with Pinal County before spending. This is a straightforward funding measure for a specific infrastructure project, with no policy changes or broad impacts beyond the designated location and recipient.

Maddy summaryHB 2373 sets new qualifications for Arizona county attorneys, directly affecting all current and future holders of this position. The bill requires county attorneys to be licensed attorneys in good standing who have practiced law in Arizona for at least five years prior to taking office. It also prohibits county boards of supervisors from paying salary to anyone ineligible under these new standards. Current county attorneys serving on the bill's effective date may continue until their current term expires. The bill amends existing law to strengthen eligibility requirements for this elected county office.

Maddy summaryHB 2276 requires Arizona state agencies to submit proposed rules expected to increase regulatory costs for businesses by more than $100,000 within five years for review by the Office of Economic Opportunity. If the cost exceeds $500,000, the rule cannot take effect until the legislature passes separate legislation approving it. Agencies cannot finalize such rules without this legislative approval, and if the legislature doesn't act during the session, the proposed rule must be terminated. This directly affects state agencies creating new rules and businesses subject to those rules, adding a legislative review step for high-cost regulations.

Maddy summaryHB 2057 expands parents' access to their minor child's medical records by requiring health care providers to give parents equivalent access to electronic portals and platforms. It guarantees parents the right to make health care decisions for their children and mandates notification if a crime against the child is suspected (unless it would impede an investigation). The bill directly affects parents of minors and health care entities in Arizona, ensuring parents can access medical records for services not requiring parental consent. It does not override existing laws requiring parental consent for specific medical treatments.