Environment

vetoed · Arizona · House Apr 13, 2026

HB 2787: federal nullification; Mexican wolf; reintroduction

HB 2787 prohibits Arizona state agencies, employees, and political subdivisions from using state resources to enforce, administer, or cooperate with the federal Mexican wolf reintroduction program under the Endangered Species Act. It directly affects state government operations by banning state involvement in the wolf program, though it exempts the existing livestock loss program managed by the Livestock Loss Board. The bill does not change federal law but aims to limit state-level support for the program, which the legislature claims has exceeded population goals since 2014 and causes economic harm to ranchers. The bill focuses on state authority over resource use, not altering the federal program itself.

Topics ✗ EnvironmentOpposes EnvironmentBlocks state support for federal Mexican wolf reintroduction under ESA, directly restricting endangered species conservation efforts and weakening environmental protection initiatives.95% confidence | Rep's Stance ✓ Voted Yes ✗ Opposes Environment

Track

passed · Arizona · House Apr 13, 2026

HB 2975: state lands; solar score; maps

HB 2975 prohibits Arizona's state land department from using solar scores or similar tools in land decisions starting from its effective date. The bill requires the department to develop two new resource scoring maps within two years: one for mining (considering known resources) and one for housing (considering development needs). These maps must be created with input from relevant industries and will guide the department’s land use planning and five-year disposal plans. The department must also submit updated maps to state leaders, including the governor and legislative leaders. This bill directly affects how Arizona manages state lands for mining, housing, and renewable energy projects.

Topics ✗ EnergyOpposes EnergyProhibits use of solar scoring tools in land decisions, removing a mechanism to advance solar projects on state lands95% confidence ✗ EnvironmentOpposes EnvironmentBill prohibits solar scores (promoting clean energy) in land decisions, replacing with mining/housing maps. Prioritizes industry development over environmental considerations, weakening clean energy promotion.85% confidence ✓ HousingSupports HousingMandates creation of housing development-focused map for land use planning, directly advancing housing development needs per bill's requirements.92% confidence ✗ TechnologyOpposes TechnologyProhibits use of solar scoring tools in land decisions, restricting tech application for renewable energy planning.90% confidence | Rep's Stance ✓ Voted Yes ✗ Opposes Environment

Track

failed · Arizona · House Mar 16, 2026

HB 2197: unlawful camping; stock; wildlife; access

HB 2197 prohibits camping within one-quarter mile of natural or man-made water sources if the camping blocks wildlife or livestock from accessing water. It directly affects people camping near water holes or watering facilities in Arizona. The key provision creates a specific buffer zone (1/4 mile) around water access points to prevent denial of water to animals. This amendment updates Arizona law to clarify restrictions on camping near critical water sources. The bill is currently in early legislative stages with no votes taken yet.

Topics ✓ EnvironmentSupports EnvironmentCreates 1/4-mile buffer zone around water sources to prevent camping from blocking wildlife/livestock access, directly protecting natural water resources and habitats.95% confidence | Rep's Stance ✗ Voted No ✗ Opposes Environment

Track

passed · Arizona · House Mar 10, 2026

HB 2912: utility; resource plan; commission review

HB 2912 requires Arizona electric utilities to submit detailed integrated resource plans to the Corporation Commission every three years. These plans must project 15-year energy demand (with low/medium/high scenarios), detail existing and planned generation assets, analyze costs and reliability of potential new plants, and use a ratepayer impact test to select the lowest-cost, most reliable option - without prioritizing emissions goals. The Commission must also obtain an independent third-party review of each plan to verify data and evaluate alternatives. The bill includes optional analysis of carbon emissions across all plant lifecycle stages (scopes 1-3), but the core requirement focuses on cost, reliability, and transparency for ratepayer decisions.

Topics ✗ EnvironmentOpposes EnvironmentBill explicitly states resource plans must select options 'without prioritizing emissions goals,' removing environmental considerations from energy planning decisions, prioritizing cost over emissions reduction.90% confidence | Rep's Stance ✓ Voted Yes ✗ Opposes Environment

Track

passed · Arizona · House Mar 9, 2026

HB 2267: public nuisance; renewable energy; exceptions

HB 2267 amends Arizona law to classify new utility-scale wind and solar farms within four miles of residential properties as public nuisances. It specifically exempts projects with existing zoning approvals, those approved by environmental committees, and nonexporting rooftop solar systems. County attorneys or the state attorney general may sue to stop these projects, with violators facing misdemeanor charges. The bill directly affects new large-scale renewable energy installations near homes, not existing projects or small residential solar systems.

Topics ✗ EnergyOpposes EnergyClassifies new utility-scale wind/solar farms near homes as public nuisances, enabling lawsuits to halt projects, directly restricting new renewable energy development.90% confidence ✗ EnvironmentOpposes EnvironmentClassifies new utility-scale wind/solar farms near homes as public nuisances, creating legal barriers to renewable energy expansion and weakening environmental progress toward clean energy adoption.95% confidence | Rep's Stance ✓ Voted Yes ✗ Opposes Environment

Track

vetoed · Arizona · Senate Mar 6, 2026

SB 1439: municipalities; counties; recycling; prohibition

SB 1439 prohibits Arizona municipalities, counties, and other local governments from requiring or recommending that residents recycle products not currently being actively recycled. The bill defines "actively recycled" as a product that is reprocessed into a new item. It amends existing recycling laws for cities (ARS §9-500.07) and counties (ARS §11-269), and adds a new statewide prohibition (ARS §49-707) covering all political subdivisions. This directly affects local governments by restricting their ability to mandate recycling of materials without established processing infrastructure, and impacts residents who may no longer be required to sort certain items into recycling bins. The law takes effect upon enactment.

Topics ✗ EnvironmentOpposes EnvironmentProhibits local governments from mandating recycling of non-active items, limiting environmental protection measures at local level.90% confidence | Rep's Stance ✓ Voted Yes ✗ Opposes Environment

Track

passed · Arizona · House Mar 3, 2026

HB 2159: Mexican wolves; landowner permits; rules

HB 2159 allows Arizona landowners to obtain permits for taking Mexican wolves on their private land or on public lands and state trust lands leased for grazing. The permit requires the Commission to determine it is necessary to reduce conflicts between wolves and humans or property, while also enabling a voluntary program for compensating landowners who use non-lethal trapping methods. The bill specifies that permits may only be issued to landowners who own private property in Arizona and lease grazing lands. This legislation directly affects landowners managing wolf-human conflicts on their property, focusing on practical, on-the-ground management rather than broader conservation policy.

Topics ✗ EnvironmentOpposes EnvironmentBill permits lethal removal of endangered Mexican wolves on private/public lands, undermining conservation efforts despite limited non-lethal compensation. Weakens protections for an endangered species.85% confidence | Rep's Stance ✓ Voted Yes ✗ Opposes Environment

Track

passed · Arizona · House Feb 26, 2026

HB 2452: comprehensive plans; data centers; nuclear

HB 2452 requires counties in Arizona with over 125,000 residents to include specific land use designations for data centers and small modular reactors in their comprehensive plans. The bill mandates counties to identify sufficient land locations and extents for data center construction and operation, and for larger counties (over 200,000 residents) to designate land for small modular reactors. It also adds provisions for energy planning, including incentives for renewable energy use and policies to support efficient energy consumption. This bill directly affects county planning processes by requiring new land-use considerations for data centers and nuclear energy infrastructure within existing planning frameworks.

Topics ✓ EnergySupports EnergyBill mandates land for data centers/SMRs and explicitly includes renewable energy incentives in energy planning provisions, advancing clean energy infrastructure development.95% confidence ✓ EnvironmentSupports EnvironmentBill mandates incentives for renewable energy use in energy planning, directly promoting clean energy adoption and environmental protection.90% confidence ✓ TechnologySupports TechnologyMandates land use planning for data centers, facilitating tech infrastructure development and aligning with renewable energy incentives for tech operations.92% confidence | Rep's Stance ✗ Voted No ✗ Opposes Environment

Track

failed · Arizona · House Feb 26, 2026

HB 2798: appropriation; Arizona geological survey; study

HB 2798 appropriates funds to the University of Arizona’s Arizona Geological Survey to study minerals and metals needed for advanced nuclear reactors (including generation III+ and IV small modular reactors). The study requires mapping all known mineral reserves across Arizona, detailing quantities and grades for each site. The Geological Survey must submit a final report to state officials and publish it online by a specified deadline. This bill directly affects Arizona’s geological data collection efforts and state officials receiving the findings, with no direct impact on the public or businesses.

Topics ✓ Budget & TaxesSupports Budget & TaxesBill explicitly appropriates state funds to study mineral reserves for nuclear reactors, directly allocating budget resources for a geological survey study.95% confidence ✓ EnergySupports EnergyFunds study of minerals for advanced nuclear reactors, supporting clean energy infrastructure development and future nuclear energy production.95% confidence ✓ EnvironmentSupports EnvironmentFunds study of minerals for advanced nuclear reactors (clean energy source), promoting climate-friendly infrastructure development as part of environmental strategy.85% confidence | Rep's Stance ✗ Voted No ✗ Opposes Environment

Track