public nuisance; renewable energy; exceptions
HB 2267 amends Arizona law to classify new utility-scale wind and solar farms within four miles of residential properties as public nuisances. It specifically exempts projects with existing zoning approvals, those approved by environmental committees, and nonexporting rooftop solar systems. County attorneys or the state attorney general may sue to stop these projects, with violators facing misdemeanor charges. The bill directly affects new large-scale renewable energy installations near homes, not existing projects or small residential solar systems.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2026
Committee Review
House Passage
Feb 2026
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Jan 21, 2026
Last action Mar 9, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
Introduced Version
→
House Engrossed Version (02/25/2026)
·
3 edits
·
Feb 25, 2026
MINOR
The bill was amended to clarify that utility-scale wind and solar farms built near homes are public nuisances, while explicitly exempting rooftop solar systems from this definition. The text was also updated to specify that the Attorney General must lead legal actions to stop these large-scale projects, distinct from local prosecutors handling other nuisance cases.
Scope change
The scope was narrowed by adding a specific exemption for rooftop solar systems, ensuring they are not classified as public nuisances under this section.
ELIGIBILITY
Added an explicit exemption for rooftop solar systems, clarifying they are not considered public nuisances under this act.
ENFORCEMENT
Clarified that the Attorney General is responsible for bringing legal actions to stop utility-scale wind and solar farms, separating this duty from local attorneys.
DEFINITION
Refined the definition of the prohibited activity to specify that it applies only to utility-scale farms constructed on or after the amendment's effective date.
Floor votes · House Feb 25, 2026
How they voted
31–23
Passed · 6 other
Total votes 60
Feb 25, 2026
D
Democratic27
85% Nay
R
Republican33
93% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
8
Key actions
3
Committee
0
Amendments
2
Feb 25, 2026
Lower · Passed
PASSED
lower
Feb 24, 2026
Lower · Passed
DPA
lower
Feb 12, 2026
Lower · Passed
DPA
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
David Marshall
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HB 2267
Scope: AZ
Hi! I can help you understand HB 2267. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline