Environment

passed · Arizona · House Mar 31, 2026

HB 2014: fuel formulations; modeling; study; appropriation

HB 2014 requires Arizona’s Department of Environmental Quality to model five specific gasoline blends against EPA-approved air emissions standards for areas A and C. The department must publish a report identifying blends eligible for sale in regulated areas, with findings due within 90 days of completing modeling. Arizona’s Department of Agriculture must then conduct a feasibility study on authorizing new blends not currently approved, assessing supply impact and availability, with a report due 90 days after study completion. The bill appropriates $100,000 each to both departments for these studies and expires September 30, 2027. This bill directly affects fuel suppliers, regulators, and the state’s transportation fuel supply planning.

Topics ✓ EnvironmentSupports EnvironmentRequires modeling gasoline blends against EPA emissions standards to ensure compliance, advancing air quality protection through regulatory enforcement.90% confidence | Rep's Stance ✓ Voted Yes ✓ Supports Environment

Track

passed · Arizona · House Mar 24, 2026

HB 2889: appropriation; uranium monitoring; mine inspector

HB 2889 appropriates $1 million from Arizona's general fund for fiscal year 2026-2027 to the state mine inspector to monitor uranium contamination. It requires the mine inspector to fund soil, water, and home testing for potential contamination and establish a statewide registry and monitoring program, partnering with tribal epidemiology centers. The bill mandates a report of findings and recommendations to state leaders by December 31, 2026. This funding is exempt from standard appropriation lapsing rules. The bill directly affects Arizona residents potentially exposed to uranium contamination, particularly in areas near mining sites.

Topics ✓ Budget & TaxesSupports Budget & TaxesAppropriates $1M from general fund for uranium monitoring, funding essential environmental health program per bill's specific allocation.95% confidence ✓ EnvironmentSupports EnvironmentFunds uranium contamination monitoring, soil/water testing, and establishes registry to protect environment from pollution per bill summary.95% confidence | Rep's Stance ✓ Voted Yes ✓ Supports Environment

Track

passed · Arizona · House Mar 18, 2026

HB 2389: replacement units; certificates; environmental compatibility

HB 2389 streamlines environmental review for utility infrastructure replacements by creating exceptions to the standard certificate of environmental compatibility requirement. It allows utilities to replace transmission line conductors/wires or adjacent power plants without new approvals, provided they meet specific conditions: 30-day notice, a public comment session, maintaining total power capacity, and replacing within sites that previously had environmental approvals (or existed before 1971). This directly affects electric utilities planning infrastructure upgrades and the Arizona Corporation Commission overseeing these reviews. The bill modifies existing rules to reduce administrative burden for routine replacements while maintaining environmental safeguards through public engagement and capacity requirements.

Topics ✗ EnvironmentOpposes EnvironmentBill removes environmental review requirement for utility replacements, weakening regulatory oversight by allowing infrastructure changes without new approvals.90% confidence | Rep's Stance ✗ Voted No ✓ Supports Environment

Track

passed · Arizona · House Mar 10, 2026

HCR 2038: Colorado River; seven-state agreement

HCR 2038 is a non-binding legislative resolution supporting Arizona's position in ongoing negotiations for a seven-state agreement governing the Colorado River. It states Arizona's support for a mutual agreement that protects the state's vital industries (agriculture, technology, and military) reliant on Colorado River water, while acknowledging Arizona's significant water conservation efforts (including $211 million invested to save up to 6.6 million acre-feet). The resolution emphasizes Arizona's historical water use reductions (8.9 million acre-feet) and economic contributions (75% of basin jobs and crop sales in the Lower Basin) as context for negotiations. It does not create new policy but formally endorses collaborative solutions to address the river's structural deficit and uphold the 1922 Compact.

Topics ✓ EnvironmentSupports EnvironmentBill highlights Arizona's $211M water conservation efforts (saving 6.6M acre-feet), directly aligning with environmental conservation indicators.85% confidence | Rep's Stance ✓ Voted Yes ✓ Supports Environment

Track

passed · Arizona · House Mar 10, 2026

HB 2912: utility; resource plan; commission review

HB 2912 requires Arizona electric utilities to submit detailed integrated resource plans to the Corporation Commission every three years. These plans must project 15-year energy demand (with low/medium/high scenarios), detail existing and planned generation assets, analyze costs and reliability of potential new plants, and use a ratepayer impact test to select the lowest-cost, most reliable option - without prioritizing emissions goals. The Commission must also obtain an independent third-party review of each plan to verify data and evaluate alternatives. The bill includes optional analysis of carbon emissions across all plant lifecycle stages (scopes 1-3), but the core requirement focuses on cost, reliability, and transparency for ratepayer decisions.

Topics ✗ EnvironmentOpposes EnvironmentBill explicitly states resource plans must select options 'without prioritizing emissions goals,' removing environmental considerations from energy planning decisions, prioritizing cost over emissions reduction.90% confidence | Rep's Stance ✗ Voted No ✓ Supports Environment

Track

passed · Arizona · House Mar 9, 2026

HB 2267: public nuisance; renewable energy; exceptions

HB 2267 amends Arizona law to classify new utility-scale wind and solar farms within four miles of residential properties as public nuisances. It specifically exempts projects with existing zoning approvals, those approved by environmental committees, and nonexporting rooftop solar systems. County attorneys or the state attorney general may sue to stop these projects, with violators facing misdemeanor charges. The bill directly affects new large-scale renewable energy installations near homes, not existing projects or small residential solar systems.

Topics ✗ EnergyOpposes EnergyClassifies new utility-scale wind/solar farms near homes as public nuisances, enabling lawsuits to halt projects, directly restricting new renewable energy development.90% confidence ✗ EnvironmentOpposes EnvironmentClassifies new utility-scale wind/solar farms near homes as public nuisances, creating legal barriers to renewable energy expansion and weakening environmental progress toward clean energy adoption.95% confidence | Rep's Stance ✗ Voted No ✓ Supports Environment

Track

vetoed · Arizona · Senate Mar 6, 2026

SB 1439: municipalities; counties; recycling; prohibition

SB 1439 prohibits Arizona municipalities, counties, and other local governments from requiring or recommending that residents recycle products not currently being actively recycled. The bill defines "actively recycled" as a product that is reprocessed into a new item. It amends existing recycling laws for cities (ARS §9-500.07) and counties (ARS §11-269), and adds a new statewide prohibition (ARS §49-707) covering all political subdivisions. This directly affects local governments by restricting their ability to mandate recycling of materials without established processing infrastructure, and impacts residents who may no longer be required to sort certain items into recycling bins. The law takes effect upon enactment.

Topics ✗ EnvironmentOpposes EnvironmentProhibits local governments from mandating recycling of non-active items, limiting environmental protection measures at local level.90% confidence | Rep's Stance ✗ Voted No ✓ Supports Environment

Track

passed · Arizona · House Mar 3, 2026

HB 2159: Mexican wolves; landowner permits; rules

HB 2159 allows Arizona landowners to obtain permits for taking Mexican wolves on their private land or on public lands and state trust lands leased for grazing. The permit requires the Commission to determine it is necessary to reduce conflicts between wolves and humans or property, while also enabling a voluntary program for compensating landowners who use non-lethal trapping methods. The bill specifies that permits may only be issued to landowners who own private property in Arizona and lease grazing lands. This legislation directly affects landowners managing wolf-human conflicts on their property, focusing on practical, on-the-ground management rather than broader conservation policy.

Topics ✗ EnvironmentOpposes EnvironmentBill permits lethal removal of endangered Mexican wolves on private/public lands, undermining conservation efforts despite limited non-lethal compensation. Weakens protections for an endangered species.85% confidence | Rep's Stance ✗ Voted No ✓ Supports Environment

Track

failed · Arizona · House Mar 3, 2026

HB 2492: urban growth boundaries; prohibition

This bill prohibits cities, counties, and state agencies from creating or enforcing any urban growth boundaries that restrict new development, housing options, or public services outside designated areas. It declares such boundaries void in local ordinances, rules, or state contracts, citing Arizona voters' 1998 and 2000 rejections of similar policies. The law aims to prevent policies that could reduce housing affordability by limiting land availability for development, referencing studies from other states. It requires a three-fourths legislative vote to take effect.

Topics ✗ EnvironmentOpposes EnvironmentRemoves urban growth boundaries that restrict development in environmentally sensitive areas, weakening land conservation policies to prioritize housing development over environmental protection.95% confidence ✓ HousingSupports HousingProhibits urban growth boundaries to increase housing supply and affordability, directly advancing affordable housing access by removing development restrictions.95% confidence | Rep's Stance ✗ Voted No ✓ Supports Environment

Track