Issue · Technology

Technology (Social Media)

Every technology bill, vote, and legislator stance in Wisconsin, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
4
2025-2026 Regular Session
Top supporter
Russell Goodwin
100% support rate
Top opponent
Shae Sortwell
0% support rate
Ranked legislators
10
5 support · 5 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving social media in Wisconsin

Legislators moving social media in Wisconsin
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Votes
Russell Goodwin
Russell Goodwin House · District 12
D
Strong +
100% 3
Steve Doyle
Steve Doyle House · District 94
D
Strong +
100% 3
Jenna Jacobson
Jenna Jacobson House · District 50
D
Support
75% 4
Ryan Spaude
Ryan Spaude House · District 89
D
Support
75% 4
Dave Maxey
Dave Maxey House · District 83
R
Support
67% 3
Shae Sortwell
Shae Sortwell House · District 2
R
Strong −
0% 3
Ann Roe
Ann Roe House · District 44
D
Oppose
25% 4
Christine Sinicki
Christine Sinicki House · District 20
D
Oppose
25% 4
Deb Andraca
Deb Andraca House · District 23
D
Oppose
25% 4
Jill Billings
Jill Billings House · District 95
D
Oppose
25% 4
Showing 4 of 4 bills

All technology bills

failed · Wisconsin · Senate Mar 23, 2026

SB 939: Relating to: artificial intelligence systems that simulate humanlike relationships with children and providing a penalty.

SB 939 prohibits operators of "companion chatbots" (AI systems designed to simulate ongoing, personalized relationships with users) from making these tools available to children under 18 without specific safety measures. It requires such chatbots to avoid encouraging self-harm, replacing professional mental health care, promoting illegal activity, sharing explicit content, prioritizing validation over safety, or optimizing engagement beyond safety features. Operators face civil penalties of up to $25,000 per violation per day, and affected children or their guardians may sue for damages. The law exempts customer service bots, internal business tools, and research systems, and includes a 2027 implementation deadline.
vetoed · Wisconsin · Assembly May 13, 2026

AB 105: Relating to: the distribution of certain material on the Internet.

AB 105 requires business entities (like websites or platforms) distributing material harmful to minors to verify users' ages using approved methods before granting access. It applies specifically to sites containing a "substantial portion" (over one-third) of such material, defined as content with sexual depictions, prurient appeal, or lacking literary/artistic value for minors. The bill exempts bona fide news organizations and internet service providers from these requirements. Violations could result in civil lawsuits seeking damages, while the bill also bans publishing obscene material involving children or obscene content online.
failed · Wisconsin · Senate Mar 23, 2026

SB 400: Relating to: use restrictions on state and local government electronic devices.

SB 400 restricts state and local government employees from using official electronic devices to access social media, apps, or AI tools owned by entities based in designated "foreign countries of concern" (as defined by federal regulations). It directly affects state agencies and local governmental units (like cities, school districts, and special districts) by prohibiting non-law enforcement personnel from downloading or using these foreign-owned technologies on government-owned devices. The bill allows for limited exceptions through written waivers granted by the secretary of administration for specific work purposes. This is a policy change focused on limiting government use of foreign-owned digital tools, not a procedural or commemorative measure.
vetoed · Wisconsin · Assembly May 13, 2026

AB 415: Relating to: use restrictions on state and local government electronic devices.

AB 415 restricts state and local government employees from using electronic devices owned by their agencies to access social media, apps, or AI tools owned by entities located in "foreign countries of concern" (as defined by federal regulations). The bill directly affects government employees and contractors who use official devices for non-law enforcement work, banning access to specific foreign-owned technology. Exceptions allow written waivers from the secretary of administration for limited job-related purposes. This policy change aims to limit government use of technology linked to designated foreign adversaries, with no impact on law enforcement activities. The bill does not create new funding or require agency budget changes.