Issue · Criminal Justice

Criminal Justice (Courts)

Every criminal justice bill, vote, and legislator stance in Wisconsin, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
34
2025-2026 Regular Session
Top supporter
Jeff Mursau
100% support rate
Top opponent
Robyn Vining
0% support rate
Ranked legislators
10
5 support · 5 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving courts in Wisconsin

Legislators moving courts in Wisconsin
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Votes
Jeff Mursau
Jeff Mursau House · District 36
R
Strong +
100% 4
Eric Wimberger
Eric Wimberger Senate · District 2
R
Support
75% 4
Adam Neylon
Adam Neylon House · District 15
R
Support
67% 6
Alex Dallman
Alex Dallman House · District 39
R
Support
67% 6
Amanda Nedweski
Amanda Nedweski House · District 32
R
Support
67% 6
Robyn Vining
Robyn Vining House · District 13
D
Strong −
0% 4
Ryan Clancy
Ryan Clancy House · District 19
D
Strong −
0% 3
Kristin Dassler-Alfheim
Kristin Dassler-Alfheim Senate · District 18
D
Oppose
25% 4
Sarah Keyeski
Sarah Keyeski Senate · District 14
D
Oppose
25% 4
Alex Joers
Alex Joers House · District 81
D
Oppose
33% 6
Showing 31–34 of 34 bills

All criminal justice bills

vetoed · Wisconsin · Assembly May 13, 2026

AB 73: Relating to: statutory recognition of specialized treatment court and commercial court dockets.

AB 73 creates a new statute (Chapter 798) to formally recognize two types of specialized court programs in Wisconsin: treatment courts and commercial courts. Treatment courts (e.g., drug, mental health, veterans courts) address underlying issues like addiction to reduce recidivism through treatment and supervision, while commercial courts handle business disputes more efficiently. The bill establishes these dockets within the existing court system, requiring judges to receive specialized training and operate using graduated sanctions and rewards. It directly affects courts handling these case types, aiming to improve outcomes for participants and streamline dispute resolution.
signed · Wisconsin · Assembly Dec 8, 2025

AB 201: Relating to: extortion, sexual extortion, and providing a penalty.

AB 201 modifies Wisconsin law to require sex offender registration for individuals convicted of sexual extortion or certain related offenses. It directs courts to mandate registration under Wisconsin Statute 301.45 if the underlying conduct was "sexually motivated" (as defined in Statute 980.01(5)), including violations of statutes related to sexual extortion (e.g., 942.09, 942.095). The bill affects offenders convicted of sexual extortion or sexually motivated crimes under Chapters 940, 942, 943, 944, or 948. Courts may later release individuals from registration if they meet conditions set by the court. This is a policy change to expand registration requirements for specific sexual offenses, not a new criminal penalty.
Sub-Topics Courts
failed · Wisconsin · Assembly Mar 23, 2026

AB 292: Relating to: the use of artificial intelligence or other machine assisted translation in court proceedings and of telephone or live audiovisual interpretation in criminal trials. (FE)

AB 292 allows courts to use artificial intelligence or machine-assisted translation services instead of or alongside human interpreters in both civil and criminal court proceedings. It also updates rules to permit telephone or live audiovisual interpretation in criminal trials (beyond just non-trial stages) and clarifies that using AI translation does not require a waiver that would normally be needed for alternative interpretation methods. This bill directly affects court proceedings involving language barriers, expanding options for language assistance without mandating AI use. The law amends specific statutes to implement these changes, focusing on procedural flexibility for courts.
failed · Wisconsin · Assembly Mar 23, 2026

AB 79: Relating to: prosecuting or adjudicating delinquent a person under the age of 18 for committing an act of prostitution.

AB 79 prevents the prosecution of minors under 18 for prostitution offenses when a court determines it serves the minor's best interests and protects public safety. Instead, the court may use diversion programs like consent decrees or deferred prosecution agreements under existing laws. The bill amends statutes to remove prosecution as an option for juveniles in these cases while maintaining DNA collection and expungement requirements for other serious juvenile offenses. This change directly affects minors charged with prostitution under section 944.30 (1m) by prioritizing rehabilitation over criminal prosecution.
Showing 31 to 34 of 34 bills
Previous 1 2 3 4