Relating to general powers of PSC
SB 669 clarifies when West Virginia's Public Service Commission (PSC) can approve utility rate increases and requires a biennial review of these increases. It directly affects utilities, particularly small municipal water/sewer systems serving fewer than 4,500 customers or with under $3 million in annual revenue, and their wholesale/resale customers. Key provisions include: a 30-day window for customers to file rate complaints after municipal changes, a 120-day resolution deadline for the PSC, and a requirement that rate increases must be supported by evidence showing costs are fairly matched to benefits received by customers. The bill also restricts the PSC from ordering refunds for rates collected during complaint proceedings unless specific refund conditions apply.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2026
Committee Review
Feb 2026
Senate Passage
Feb 2026
House of Delegates Passage
Governor
Introduced Jan 29, 2026
Last action Mar 5, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 3 comparisons
What changed between versions
Engrossed Committee Substitute
→
sb669 sfa willis 2-23 _1 adopted.htm
·
2 edits
MINOR
The bill was amended to replace the existing text of subsection (e) with a new version that imposes stricter requirements on the Public Service Commission. The change mandates that the commission cannot approve rate increases for retail West Virginia customers unless it finds the costs are proportionate to or less than the benefits received. Additionally, the commission must now publicly publish and provide a written, quantitative justification for any approved rate increase.
Scope change
The scope of the Public Service Commission's authority to approve rate increases was narrowed by adding a specific 'benefit-cost' test and a mandatory public justification requirement.
REQUIREMENT
Added a new requirement that the commission must find costs to retail ratepayers are proportionate to or less than benefits before approving any rate increase.
Added a new requirement that the commission must publicly publish and provide a written, quantitative justification for any approved rate increase.
Floor votes · Senate Feb 24, 2026
How they voted
33–0
Passed
Total votes 33
Feb 24, 2026
D
Democratic2
100% Yea
R
Republican31
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
21
Key actions
3
Committee
6
Feb 25, 2026
Committee
To House Energy and Public Works
lower
Feb 25, 2026
Introduced
Introduced in House
lower
Feb 24, 2026
Upper · Passed
Passed Senate (Roll No. 210)
upper
Feb 23, 2026
Upper · Passed
Floor amendment adopted (Voice vote)
upper
Feb 20, 2026
Upper · Passed
Reported do pass
upper
Feb 4, 2026
Committee
To Judiciary
upper
Feb 4, 2026
Committee
Committee substitute reported, but first to Judiciary
upper
Jan 29, 2026
Committee
To Economic Development
upper
Jan 29, 2026
Introduced
Introduced in Senate
upper
Jan 29, 2026
Committee
To Economic Development then Judiciary
upper
1 primary · 10 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Darren Thorne
RRepublican
Co
Chris Rose
RRepublican
Co
Eric Tarr
RRepublican
Co
Laura Chapman
RRepublican
Co
Mark Maynard
RRepublican
Co
Mike Woelfel
DDemocratic
Co
Patricia Rucker
RRepublican
Co
Patrick Martin
RRepublican
Co
Rollan Roberts
RRepublican
Co
Tom Willis
RRepublican
Co
Vince Deeds
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 669
Scope: WV
Hi! I can help you understand SB 669. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline