Issue · Environment

Environment

Every environment bill, vote, and legislator stance in Virginia, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
52
2026 Regular Session
Top supporter
Bonita Anthony
99% support rate
Top opponent
Eric Zehr
2% support rate
Ranked legislators
10
5 support · 5 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving environment in Virginia

Legislators moving environment in Virginia
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Votes
Bonita Anthony
Bonita Anthony House · District 92
D
Strong +
99% 113
May Nivar
May Nivar House · District 57
D
Strong +
99% 113
Irene Shin
Irene Shin House · District 8
D
Strong +
99% 115
Rip Sullivan
Rip Sullivan House · District 6
D
Strong +
99% 110
Michelle Maldonado
Michelle Maldonado House · District 20
D
Strong +
99% 108
Eric Zehr
Eric Zehr House · District 51
R
Strong −
2% 85
Tim Griffin
Tim Griffin House · District 53
R
Strong −
2% 79
Delores Oates
Delores Oates House · District 31
R
Strong −
2% 84
Mitchell Cornett
Mitchell Cornett House · District 46
R
Strong −
2% 82
Phil Scott
Phil Scott House · District 63
R
Strong −
2% 81
Showing 51–52 of 52 bills

All environment bills

in committee · Virginia · House of Delegates Feb 18, 2026

HB 367: Consultation with federally recognized tribes; permits and reviews, etc.

Consultation with federally recognized tribes; permits and reviews with potential impacts on environmental, cultural, and historic resources. Adds to the duties of the Ombudsman for Tribal Consultation requirements to (i) facilitate communication between federally recognized tribes and relevant state agencies and local governments to ensure an opportunity for meaningful and timely consultation on environmental, cultural, and historical permits and reviews; (ii) assist the Department of Transportation in developing consultation policies; (iii) make recommendations to the Governor on the basis of communications with federally recognized tribes about (a) circumstances under which tribal consent should be required for issuance of certain permits and (b) additional agencies that should develop policies and procedures to ensure meaningful, timely, and appropriate consultation with federally recognized tribes; (iv) provide training at least once a year to certain state agency personnel on issues of concern to the federally recognized tribes to support effective communication, collaboration, and positive government-to-government relations between the Commonwealth and the federally recognized tribes; and (v) submit an annual report to the Secretary of the Commonwealth on the activities undertaken to implement such provisions and the issues that have arisen in that pursuit. The bill also requires the Department of Conservation and Recreation, Department of Environmental Quality, Department of Historic Resources, Department of Transportation, and Marine Resources Commission to engage in consultation with federally recognized tribes on certain issues. During such consultation, the burden is on the agency to show that it has made a good faith effort to elicit meaningful and timely feedback, including formal communication between agency employees and the federally recognized tribe. When a burial permit will result in the disturbance of a burial site of an individual that has a cultural affiliation with a particular federally recognized tribe, the bill requires the Department of Historic Resources to acquire the consent of such federally recognized tribe before issuing a permit for the archaeological excavation of human remains. This bill is a recommendation of the Commission on Updating Virginia Law to Reflect Federal Recognition of Virginia Tribes.
in committee · Virginia · House of Delegates Feb 18, 2026

HB 1154: Chesapeake Bay Preservation Act; certain boundary line adjustments.

Certain boundary line adjustments; Chesapeake Bay Preservation Act. Requires a locality to provide, by ordinance, that a boundary line adjustment that applies to lots that are located in a Resource Protection Area and that are grandfathered under the Chesapeake Bay Preservation Act does not create a new lot of record. The bill requires such ordinance to include that such boundary line adjustment shall be considered as a lot that predates the Act. The bill clarifies that its provisions do not limit a locality's zoning authority. The bill also directs the State Water Control Board to amend its criteria under the Act to allow an owner of a lot in any locality that predates the Act to submit an application for a boundary line adjustment without creating a new lot of record.
Showing 51 to 52 of 52 bills
Previous 1 4 5 6