Issue · Immigration

Immigration

Every immigration bill, vote, and legislator stance in United States, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
4
119th Congress
Top supporter
Christian D. Menefee
89% support rate
Top opponent
Gregory F. Murphy
13% support rate
Ranked legislators
10
5 support · 5 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving immigration in United States

Legislators moving immigration in United States
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Decisive votes
Christian D. Menefee
Christian D. Menefee House · District 18
D
Strong +
89% 9
Nancy Pelosi
Nancy Pelosi House · District 11
D
Strong +
86% 21
Seth Moulton
Seth Moulton House · District 6
D
Strong +
86% 21
Joyce Beatty
Joyce Beatty House · District 3
D
Strong +
85% 20
Brad Sherman
Brad Sherman House · District 32
D
Strong +
85% 26
Gregory F. Murphy
Gregory F. Murphy House · District 3
R
Strong −
13% 23
Ronny Jackson
Ronny Jackson House · District 13
R
Strong −
14% 28
Clay Fuller
Clay Fuller House · District 14
R
Strong −
14% 7
Brad Finstad
Brad Finstad House · District 1
R
Strong −
15% 26
Elise M. Stefanik
Elise M. Stefanik House · District 21
R
Strong −
15% 26
Showing 4 of 4 bills

All immigration bills

passed · United States · House Sep 15, 2025

HR 3486: Stop Illegal Entry Act of 2025

HR 3486, the Stop Illegal Entry Act of 2025, increases penalties for certain immigration violations under the Immigration and Nationality Act. It raises the mandatory prison term for unlawful entry (Section 275) from 2 to 5 years and adds new provisions for aliens who commit crimes after entry. For reentry after removal (Section 276), it increases the base penalty to up to 10 years imprisonment, with enhanced penalties of up to 15 years for those with prior drug or violent crime convictions, and mandatory minimums of 10 years or more for those with prior aggravated felonies, multiple removals, or prior convictions for serious crimes. The bill directly affects noncitizens who enter the U.S. illegally or reenter after being removed, with penalties applying to specific categories of prior criminal conduct.
passed · United States · House Jun 27, 2025

HR 875: Jeremy and Angel Seay and Sergeant Brandon Mendoza Protect Our Communities from DUIs Act of 2025

HR 875 amends immigration law to make non-citizens with DUI convictions inadmissible (preventing entry) and deportable (requiring removal after entry). It applies to any conviction for driving while intoxicated or impaired under state, tribal, or local law, regardless of whether the offense is classified as a misdemeanor or felony. The bill directly affects non-citizens convicted of driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs, including impairment from other substances. This policy change expands immigration consequences for DUI offenses beyond current standards.
passed · United States · House Feb 13, 2025

HR 35: Agent Raul Gonzalez Officer Safety Act

HR 35, the Agent Raul Gonzalez Officer Safety Act, creates a new federal crime for operating a motor vehicle while intentionally fleeing U.S. Border Patrol agents or assisting law enforcement officers within 100 miles of the U.S. border. It imposes penalties of up to 2 years in prison for the basic offense, 5-20 years if serious injury occurs, and 10 years to life if death results. The bill also makes individuals convicted of this crime inadmissible to the U.S., deportable, and ineligible for immigration relief like asylum. Additionally, it requires annual reports from the Attorney General and Homeland Security Secretary detailing arrests, charges, and penalties related to this offense.
passed · United States · House Feb 10, 2025

HR 29: Laken Riley Act

The Laken Riley Act expands mandatory detention for immigrants convicted of certain property crimes like burglary, theft, or shoplifting by adding these offenses to existing immigration detention criteria. It requires the federal government to issue detainers for such individuals and take custody if not detained by local authorities. The bill also grants state attorneys general standing to sue federal officials in federal court if they believe immigration enforcement actions (like releasing detained immigrants) cause the state financial harm exceeding $100. This creates new legal pathways for states to challenge federal immigration decisions through expedited lawsuits.