Criminal Justice (Courts)

The Preventing Pretrial Gun Purchases Act would prohibit firearm sales to individuals subject to a court order (released before trial) that specifically bans them from possessing or purchasing guns. It amends federal gun law to add such court orders as a new reason for barring firearm transfers, updating background check systems to require states to report these orders to the national database. The bill allocates $25 million annually from 2026 to 2030 to help states and tribes report these orders, ensuring gun dealers can check eligibility during background checks. This directly affects people under such court orders and gun dealers processing transfers.

This bill repeals key protections in the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act that shielded gun manufacturers from civil lawsuits. It allows victims of gun violence to use federal gun trace data (from the Firearms Trace System database) as evidence in civil court cases against gun sellers or manufacturers. The law makes this trace information discoverable, admissible, and usable in any civil action in state or federal courts, including the District of Columbia. This change directly affects victims seeking legal recourse and gun industry entities previously protected by the repealed law.

This bill requires states to cover 12 annual telehealth mental health visits for Medicaid enrollees who were recently incarcerated in a public institution and are under court-ordered home confinement. It amends Medicaid law to mandate this coverage specifically for individuals released from prison and subject to home confinement, effective after the bill's enactment. The provision applies to all states operating under Medicaid plans or waivers, ensuring consistent access to mental health support during the reentry phase. It directly affects formerly incarcerated individuals transitioning from prison to home supervision, focusing on accessible mental health care through telehealth. The policy change is limited to Medicaid-covered telehealth visits during the period of home confinement, with no additional funding specified.

This bill creates a federal grant program to provide legal resources for individuals seeking extreme risk protection orders (ERPOs), which temporarily remove firearms from people deemed a risk to themselves or others. It authorizes $50 million annually (2027-2031) for states, local governments, and tribes to fund legal counsel, multilingual resource centers, and training for legal and law enforcement staff on ERPO processes. The grants specifically aim to help "covered petitioners" (those eligible to request ERPOs) access representation and understand the legal process, including distinguishing ERPOs from domestic violence protection orders. The bill does not change ERPO standards or create new court jurisdiction but ensures petitioners have legal support.

S 2379, the "Countering Threats and Attacks on Our Judges Act," creates a new program to improve safety for state and local judges and court staff. It authorizes the State Justice Institute to fund eligible national nonprofits (with specific expertise in judicial security, courthouse design, and court operations) to establish State Judicial Threat Intelligence and Resource Centers. These centers will provide safety training, monitor threats, coordinate with law enforcement, develop standardized reporting systems, and create a national database for sharing threat information. The bill also requires an annual report to Congress on the number and types of threats faced by judges and court staff.

The Cell-Site Simulator Warrant Act of 2025 requires law enforcement agencies to obtain a court-issued warrant before using cell-site simulators (devices that mimic cell towers to track or intercept phone communications), with specific requirements to limit surveillance scope. Agencies must demonstrate other investigative methods have failed or would be too dangerous, specify the narrowest possible area and time frame for use, and disclose potential disruptions to emergency services like 911 calls. Exceptions exist for emergencies (requiring 48-hour warrant applications), certain research, and protective services, but information about people not under investigation must be minimized and destroyed. The bill also mandates annual reports to Congress on usage patterns and requires third-party testing of devices to verify accuracy before deployment.

Ending Coercion of Children and Harm Online or the ECCHO Act This bill establishes a federal framework to combat the online coercion of minors to commit harm. The bill creates new criminal offenses, expands reporting of instances involving the online coercion of minors, facilitates the prosecution of offenders, and expands protections for minors who testify in court. Specifically, the bill makes it a crime to intentionally coerce a minor to commit suicide (or attempt to); kill someone (or attempt to); kill a pet, emotional support animal, service animal, or horse (or attempt to); physically harm an individual (including the minor), pet, emotional support animal, service animal, or horse; or commit (or attempt to commit) arson or certain other acts such as doxxing or swatting. A violation (or conspiracy or attempt to commit a violation) is subject to a fine, a prison term, or both. The bill requires electronic communication service providers and remote computing service providers to report instances of online coercion of minors to the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children via the CyberTipline. The bill facilitates the federal prosecution of offenses committed by (1) individuals as part of a child exploitation enterprise, and (2) minors in certain circumstances. The bill extends various protections for minors who testify in court (e.g., certain privacy protections) to those who are victims of or witnesses to crimes involving mental injury (i.e., psychological or intellectual harm to a child) or the negligent treatment of a child.

The Government Surveillance Transparency Act of 2026 limits how long courts can keep surveillance orders, applications, and related documents sealed (maximally 180 days initially, with limited extensions), and requires courts to make key details about these surveillance cases publicly available through docket records. It mandates law enforcement to provide notice to individuals whose communications were surveilled, with limited exceptions for ongoing investigations, and establishes new reporting requirements for courts about surveillance orders. The bill also creates grants to help state and tribal courts implement these transparency requirements. This law directly affects federal, state, and tribal courts, law enforcement agencies, and individuals whose communications are subject to surveillance.

The SERVE Our Communities Act (HR 198) creates a federal grant program providing $10 million annually from 2026-2031 to states and local governments that meet specific crime prevention criteria. To qualify, jurisdictions must require courts to consider public safety risks when setting bail or pretrial release (Section 2(b)(1)) and must have implemented one of three actions in the prior year: enacted bail reform, increased law enforcement staffing, or run public safety education programs (Section 2(b)(2)). Grant funds can only be used for evidence-based reentry and violence prevention programs under the Second Chance Act (Section 2(c)). The bill directly affects state and local governments by tying federal funding to specific bail reform and community safety measures, aiming to reduce repeat violent offenses through systemic changes.

This bill amends federal gun law to prevent individuals under certain court-ordered pretrial restrictions from purchasing firearms. It adds a new definition of "pretrial release order" (a court order restricting release pending trial) and modifies Section 922(d) to explicitly prohibit firearm purchases or possession by anyone subject to such an order. The law directly affects arrested individuals awaiting trial who have a court order banning firearm possession, including those in federal, state, tribal, or local courts. The key change clarifies that firearm transfers to these individuals would violate federal law, strengthening background checks during the pretrial phase.