SB 44 allows South Dakota's Attorney General to obtain business records from internet and telecom providers during criminal investigations of internet crimes against children or human trafficking. It requires judicial approval based on "reasonable cause" before issuing subpoenas for specific records like IP addresses, account details, and device information. Hughes County judges have statewide authority to approve these subpoenas, which cannot notify account holders, and obtained records must be used solely for law enforcement with privacy safeguards. The bill directly affects providers (including internet and telecom companies) by mandating compliance with court-ordered requests for targeted data.
SB 135 requires data center operators to pay all electricity costs associated with their facilities, preventing utilities from raising residential rates to cover these expenses (Section 3). It also prohibits tax exemptions for data centers (Section 5) and ensures local governments retain authority to regulate data center development (Section 4). The bill mandates data centers to report projected water usage to local providers and the Board of Water Management before operation, with annual reports on actual consumption (Sections 6-7), ensuring water allocation prioritizes residential and essential services. This directly affects data center operators, utilities, and South Dakota residents by limiting cost-shifting and protecting local resource management.
SB 205 revises drone registration fees in South Dakota, charging 1.5% of purchase price for agricultural drones and 2% for all other drones. The collected fees fund a new "drone aviation fund" administered by the Board of Technical Education to support drone training grants at state technical colleges. This bill directly affects drone owners (especially agricultural users) by changing their registration tax rates and creating a dedicated funding source for drone industry workforce development. The fund will receive all drone registration fees and interest, with expenditures requiring annual budget approval. The bill does not apply to small unmanned aircraft systems covered under federal regulations.
This bill exempts sales tax on enterprise information technology equipment and computer software purchased for use in South Dakota's qualified data centers. It directly affects data center owners, operators, or tenants (referred to as "qualified businesses") who meet specific criteria, such as having facilities classified as real property subject to taxation and equipped with fire suppression systems. The key mechanism requires businesses to submit documentation to the Department of Revenue to verify eligibility and maintain annual certification. To retain the exemption, businesses must also ensure electric service agreements avoid shifting costs to other customers and confirm water usage compatibility with local providers. The tax exemption applies to equipment like servers, cooling systems, power infrastructure, and security systems used exclusively in these facilities.
SB 232 imposes a one-year moratorium (through June 30, 2027) on building new hyperscale data centers or expanding existing ones to meet the hyperscale definition in South Dakota. A "hyperscale data center" is defined as a facility with peak electrical demand of 50 megawatts or greater, used for storing, managing, and processing large volumes of electronic data. The moratorium applies to both new construction and expansions that would cause a facility to reach or exceed the 50-megawatt threshold. This bill directly affects data center developers and operators planning projects meeting the specified size criteria.
SB 127 limits data center operations to reduce disruptions for nearby residents. It prohibits new data centers within one mile of residential areas (though local governments can set stricter rules) and caps continuous noise at 45 decibels near residential property lines. The bill defines data centers broadly to include cloud services, cryptocurrency mining, and streaming platforms. Violations would be deemed legal nuisances, allowing state attorneys or affected residents to seek court orders to stop the disruptions.
