Issue · Labor & Employment

Labor & Employment (Professional Licensing)

Every labor & employment bill, vote, and legislator stance in South Dakota, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
4
2026 Regular Session
Top supporter
Drew Peterson
100% support rate
Top opponent
Aaron Aylward
0% support rate
Ranked legislators
10
5 support · 5 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving professional licensing in South Dakota

Legislators moving professional licensing in South Dakota
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Votes
Drew Peterson
Drew Peterson House · District 19
R
Strong +
100% 5
Lana Greenfield
Lana Greenfield House · District 22
R
Strong +
100% 5
Les Heinemann
Les Heinemann House · District 25
R
Strong +
100% 5
Mike Weisgram
Mike Weisgram House · District 24
R
Strong +
100% 5
Nicole Uhre-Balk
Nicole Uhre-Balk House · District 32
D
Strong +
100% 5
Aaron Aylward
Aaron Aylward House · District 6
R
Strong −
0% 5
Jana Hunt
Jana Hunt House · District 28A
R
Strong −
0% 4
Kathy Rice
Kathy Rice House · District 29
R
Strong −
0% 4
Marty Overweg
Marty Overweg House · District 21
R
Strong −
0% 4
Phil Jensen
Phil Jensen House · District 33
R
Strong −
0% 4
Showing 4 of 4 bills

All labor & employment bills

passed · South Dakota · House Feb 6, 2026

HB 1239: require that the Department of Education provide for the compensation of a teacher employed by a school district.

HB 1239 requires South Dakota's Department of Education to pay the full salary and benefits for all teachers employed by public school districts, replacing the previous system where districts covered these costs. The bill establishes a state-mandated salary schedule that must include increases based on a teacher's certification demand, highest degree, and years of experience, with benefits set at a minimum of 29% of salary. It also limits school districts from exceeding a target teacher ratio factor (calculated by enrollment size) without state approval. This directly affects all South Dakota public school districts and their teaching staff by shifting funding responsibility to the state.
signed · South Dakota · Senate Feb 25, 2026

SB 63: establish the state office of apprenticeship within the Department of Labor and Regulation.

SB 63 establishes a State Office of Apprenticeship within South Dakota's Department of Labor and Regulation. The office will serve as the state's main agency for apprenticeships, setting standards for training programs, promoting apprenticeship opportunities, and resolving disputes between apprentices and employers. It directly affects apprentices, employers, and training programs participating in registered apprenticeships across South Dakota. The office will implement federal apprenticeship standards effective January 1, 2026, as outlined in 29 C.F.R. § 29.1-29.14.
vetoed · South Dakota · House Mar 30, 2026

HB 1138: require the licensure of non-medical home care agencies, and to provide a penalty therefor.

HB 1138 requires non-medical home care agencies in South Dakota to obtain a license from the Department of Health before operating. Agencies must submit applications, pay a fee (capped at $100), and verify that home care aides complete 10 hours of mandatory training (covering dementia care, safety, nutrition, and abuse reporting) and pass criminal background checks. The bill directly affects home care agencies, their employees (home care aides), and clients receiving services like bathing assistance, meal prep, or companionship in their homes. Operating without a license is a Class 1 misdemeanor, and agencies must maintain client records and allow department inspections.
signed · South Dakota · Senate Feb 17, 2026

SB 52: clarify statutes governing the administration of disability benefits by the South Dakota Retirement System.

This bill clarifies the process for applying for and receiving disability benefits through the South Dakota Retirement System. It specifically amends three sections of state law to define how the executive director determines eligibility (requiring provider/employer statements, allowing medical exams, and specifying refusal leads to denial), when benefits begin (starting the month after service ends), and how benefits are terminated (requiring certification of non-disability, following the same review process as initial applications, and providing 30 days' notice before termination). The bill directly affects current and future South Dakota Retirement System members applying for or receiving disability benefits. It focuses on administrative clarity without changing eligibility criteria or benefit amounts.