Issue · Labor & Employment

Labor & Employment

Every labor & employment bill, vote, and legislator stance in South Dakota, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
4
2026 Regular Session
Top supporter
Mary Fitzgerald
100% support rate
Top opponent
Aaron Aylward
14% support rate
Ranked legislators
10
5 support · 5 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving labor & employment in South Dakota

Legislators moving labor & employment in South Dakota
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Decisive votes
Mary Fitzgerald
Mary Fitzgerald House · District 31
R
Strong +
100% 7
Drew Peterson
Drew Peterson House · District 19
R
Strong +
89% 9
Jessica Bahmuller
Jessica Bahmuller House · District 19
R
Strong +
88% 8
Les Heinemann
Les Heinemann House · District 25
R
Strong +
88% 8
John Hughes
John Hughes House · District 13
R
Strong +
86% 7
Aaron Aylward
Aaron Aylward House · District 6
R
Strong −
14% 7
Tony Randolph
Tony Randolph House · District 35
R
Strong −
14% 7
Joy Hohn
Joy Hohn Senate · District 9
R
Strong −
20% 5
Sue Peterson
Sue Peterson Senate · District 13
R
Strong −
20% 5
Jana Hunt
Jana Hunt House · District 28A
R
Oppose
29% 7
Showing 4 of 4 bills

All labor & employment bills

signed · South Dakota · Senate Mar 30, 2026

SB 136: make an appropriation for grants to support the purchase of personal protective equipment by volunteer fire departments and to declare an emergency.

This bill appropriates $5 million from the general fund to provide grants for volunteer fire departments in South Dakota to purchase safety gear (like helmets and suits) for their firefighters. It specifically targets departments where at least 70% of firefighters volunteer, prioritizing those with the greatest equipment needs. The Department of Public Safety will distribute funds based on application timing and need, with unspent funds reverting by June 2030. An emergency declaration allows the funding to take effect immediately upon passage.
failed · South Dakota · House Feb 20, 2026

HB 1163: prohibit certain persons from requiring genetic-based vaccinations.

HB 1163 prohibits employers, schools, and public accommodations from requiring genetic-based vaccinations (defined as those using mRNA, DNA, or similar genetic technology) as a condition for employment, enrollment, or services. It also bans adverse actions like termination or denial of services based on vaccination status. The bill allows reasonable safety measures like masks or remote work but exempts healthcare facilities under federal rules, existing school vaccine requirements, health science program placements, court-ordered vaccinations, and the National Guard. This directly affects employers, educational institutions, and public service providers in South Dakota.
passed · South Dakota · House Feb 10, 2026

HB 1242: require emergency personnel to use flares or emergency reflective triangles to mark stopped emergency vehicles in some circumstances.

HB 1242 requires emergency personnel (police, fire, EMTs) to place three flares or emergency reflective triangles around stopped emergency vehicles when visibility is reduced by weather, terrain, or time of day; road conditions make stopping difficult; or the emergency requires extended vehicle stops. The law specifies placement: 100 feet front and rear on two-way roads, with adjusted spacing (100 feet and 200 feet rear) on one-way roads. This applies to all emergency vehicles operating under the statute's exemptions. The policy change aims to improve safety visibility for responders and other drivers during emergency stops.
passed · South Dakota · House Feb 5, 2026

HB 1050: increase civil penalties for commercial driver violations.

HB 1050 increases civil fines for commercial drivers who violate safety regulations. It raises penalties to $3,963 for a first conviction and $7,926 for repeat offenses for drivers violating out-of-service orders. Employers face fines of $7,157-$39,617 for certain violations, such as allowing unsafe driving practices. The bill directly affects commercial drivers and their employers by imposing higher financial consequences for safety rule breaches. These changes apply to specific violations under South Dakota’s commercial driver safety laws.